China Seeks Joint Probe into Indian ‘Missile Misfire’

An accidental missile fired by India last week prompted Pakistan to prepare a retaliatory strike, people familiar with the matter said, showing how close the nuclear-armed neighbors came to blows over a potentially disastrous mistake. The Indian Air Force fired the BrahMos medium-range cruise missile on March 9 from the garrison town of Ambala, about 200 kilometers (125 miles) north of the capital New Delhi, according to people familiar with the matter in India.

Pakistan had prepared to launch a similar missile to strike India but held back because an initial assessment indicated something was amiss, people familiar with the matter said. While talking to Global Times on condition of anonymity, a defence analyst of Pakistan told that the incident has inherent risks, and it could have led to retaliation and escalation.

Pakistan has vehemently protested and denounced the Indian-made supersonic missile violating Pakistan’s airspace last week. Pakistan has also demanded a full and transparent probe into the event, which Pakistan says demonstrates India’s contempt for flight safety and regional peace and security.

In a statement released on Saturday, the Foreign Office stated that this serious situation cannot be resolved with the Indian authorities’ “simplistic explanation” and that Pakistan requires a joint investigation to accurately uncover the facts surrounding the event.

China, on Monday, called on Pakistan and India to launch a thorough investigation into the violation of Pakistani airspace by an intruding Indian supersonic missile.

Addressing a weekly news briefing on Monday in Beijing, Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Zhao Lijian urged to establish a notification mechanism in time to prevent the recurrence of such incidents and miscalculations. “We call on relevant countries to have dialogue and communication as soon as possible and launch a thorough investigation into this incident, strengthen information sharing, and establish a notification mechanism in time to prevent the recurrence of such incidents and miscalculations,” he added.

He said that India and Pakistan are two important countries in the region of South Asia and they share the responsibility to uphold the region’s collective security and end instability. Lijian also said that the Chinese side has noted the information regarding the airspace violation incident. Earlier, a Chinese former defence attache in a South Asian country asked the world community to probe Indian so-called clarification on supersonic projectile crash into Pakistani territory.

Quoting analysts, the prestigious English news and view outlet of China, Global Times reported that India’s neighboring countries including China, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Bhutan should also be concerned about its lack of effective security protocols or technical safeguards because this could potentially turn into unexpected consequences under complex situations.

The Pakistani military used restraint in the incident after carefully assessing the scenario and considering a variety of circumstances, according to the expert, who also noted that forbearance is not always the case.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »