Pakistan’s Diplomatic Efforts Versus Cross-Border Terrorism
Since the Taliban returned to Kabul in August 2021, Pakistan has done exactly what a responsible neighbour is expected to do. It talked, it protested through proper channels, it accepted mediation and it waited. The question today is no longer whether Pakistan tried diplomacy. The record shows it tried harder and longer than almost any state would. The real question is what a country is supposed to do when years of patience are answered with evasion.
A Record No One Can Dismiss
The numbers tell the story. Pakistan sent four foreign minister-level visits to Kabul. It held eight Joint Coordination Committee meetings. Its officers sat through 225 border flag meetings. Its Foreign Office issued 836 protest notes and 13 formal demarches, each one asking the Taliban regime to act against terrorist sanctuaries and more than 50 militant camps. Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has said that despite these efforts, Kabul gave no positive response.
These are not the figures of a state looking for a fight. They are the figures of a state that kept choosing dialogue, even as its soldiers and civilians were being buried.
Every Door Was Knocked On
Pakistan did not limit itself to bilateral channels. It took its case to Doha, Istanbul, Riyadh and Ürümqi, accepting the good offices of Qatar, Türkiye, Saudi Arabia and China. The Foreign Office has noted that Pakistan engaged the Afghan Taliban through several rounds of talks facilitated by friendly countries, yet meaningful progress was never achieved.
No serious observer can claim Islamabad refused the negotiating table. It went to every table that was offered, in every capital willing to host it.
Verbal Assurances From a Regime That Breaks Written Ones
At the heart of these talks was one simple demand: written, verifiable guarantees that Afghan soil would not be used against Pakistan. What Pakistan received instead were verbal assurances.
That gap matters. The Taliban already signed one written commitment, in the Doha Agreement, pledging not to allow their territory to be used against any other country. That pledge has been ignored. A regime that walks away from signed undertakings cannot expect its spoken promises to be taken at face value. Pakistan’s insistence on written guarantees was not stubbornness. It was the minimum any sovereign state would demand from a partner with this track record.
The Cost of Talks Without Results
While Kabul offered words, Pakistan counted bodies. According to the defence minister, 3,844 Pakistanis, soldiers and civilians alike, were martyred after the Taliban takeover, across 10,347 terror incidents. International monitors have confirmed what Pakistan has said all along: UN Monitoring Team reports found that Al-Qaeda and the TTP had regrouped in Afghanistan with facilitation by the Taliban regime.
The evidence keeps arriving. After this year’s Karachi attack, the Foreign Office said Afghan nationals took part, with one captured alive. After the Bannu suicide bombing that martyred 15 policemen, Pakistan again demanded concrete and verifiable action against Fitna al Khawarij, Fitna al Hindustan and ISKP elements operating from Afghan soil. Each demarche was received. None was acted upon.
Those Who Blame Islamabad Ignore the Paper Trail
Kabul’s defenders, and the commentators abroad who are quick to label Pakistan’s security response as aggression, have a convenient habit of starting the story at the end. They skip the 836 protest notes. They skip the mediation in four capitals. They skip the thousands of graves. It is easy to lecture Pakistan about restraint from a distance, when it is not your markets, your police posts and your schools being targeted from across the border.
The Taliban regime, for its part, has chosen to shelter the very groups killing Pakistanis while asking Islamabad for patience. Khawaja Asif has gone further, accusing the Afghan Taliban of aligning with India and backing anti-Pakistan groups. Whatever Kabul’s motives, the result is the same: its territory remains a launchpad, and its assurances remain empty.
When Diplomacy Runs Out
Diplomacy is a tool, not an end in itself. Its purpose is to secure outcomes, and in Pakistan’s case the required outcome was clear: an end to terrorism launched from Afghan soil. When years of engagement produce nothing measurable, a state has a duty to protect its citizens by other means. That is why, after diplomatic efforts failed, Pakistan launched Operation Ghazab lil-Haq against terrorist hideouts inside Afghanistan.
Pakistan’s door to dialogue is not closed. But the terms have changed. The era of protest letters and polite appeals is over. Any future talks must deliver written, verifiable guarantees and visible action against terrorist infrastructure. Pakistan has more than earned the right to insist on results, and the burden now rests entirely on Kabul.
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
From Doha To Ürümqi, The Taliban Kept Stalling
Pakistan’s Diplomatic Efforts Versus Cross-Border Terrorism
Since the Taliban returned to Kabul in August 2021, Pakistan has done exactly what a responsible neighbour is expected to do. It talked, it protested through proper channels, it accepted mediation and it waited. The question today is no longer whether Pakistan tried diplomacy. The record shows it tried harder and longer than almost any state would. The real question is what a country is supposed to do when years of patience are answered with evasion.
A Record No One Can Dismiss
The numbers tell the story. Pakistan sent four foreign minister-level visits to Kabul. It held eight Joint Coordination Committee meetings. Its officers sat through 225 border flag meetings. Its Foreign Office issued 836 protest notes and 13 formal demarches, each one asking the Taliban regime to act against terrorist sanctuaries and more than 50 militant camps. Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has said that despite these efforts, Kabul gave no positive response.
These are not the figures of a state looking for a fight. They are the figures of a state that kept choosing dialogue, even as its soldiers and civilians were being buried.
Every Door Was Knocked On
Pakistan did not limit itself to bilateral channels. It took its case to Doha, Istanbul, Riyadh and Ürümqi, accepting the good offices of Qatar, Türkiye, Saudi Arabia and China. The Foreign Office has noted that Pakistan engaged the Afghan Taliban through several rounds of talks facilitated by friendly countries, yet meaningful progress was never achieved.
No serious observer can claim Islamabad refused the negotiating table. It went to every table that was offered, in every capital willing to host it.
Verbal Assurances From a Regime That Breaks Written Ones
At the heart of these talks was one simple demand: written, verifiable guarantees that Afghan soil would not be used against Pakistan. What Pakistan received instead were verbal assurances.
That gap matters. The Taliban already signed one written commitment, in the Doha Agreement, pledging not to allow their territory to be used against any other country. That pledge has been ignored. A regime that walks away from signed undertakings cannot expect its spoken promises to be taken at face value. Pakistan’s insistence on written guarantees was not stubbornness. It was the minimum any sovereign state would demand from a partner with this track record.
The Cost of Talks Without Results
While Kabul offered words, Pakistan counted bodies. According to the defence minister, 3,844 Pakistanis, soldiers and civilians alike, were martyred after the Taliban takeover, across 10,347 terror incidents. International monitors have confirmed what Pakistan has said all along: UN Monitoring Team reports found that Al-Qaeda and the TTP had regrouped in Afghanistan with facilitation by the Taliban regime.
The evidence keeps arriving. After this year’s Karachi attack, the Foreign Office said Afghan nationals took part, with one captured alive. After the Bannu suicide bombing that martyred 15 policemen, Pakistan again demanded concrete and verifiable action against Fitna al Khawarij, Fitna al Hindustan and ISKP elements operating from Afghan soil. Each demarche was received. None was acted upon.
Those Who Blame Islamabad Ignore the Paper Trail
Kabul’s defenders, and the commentators abroad who are quick to label Pakistan’s security response as aggression, have a convenient habit of starting the story at the end. They skip the 836 protest notes. They skip the mediation in four capitals. They skip the thousands of graves. It is easy to lecture Pakistan about restraint from a distance, when it is not your markets, your police posts and your schools being targeted from across the border.
The Taliban regime, for its part, has chosen to shelter the very groups killing Pakistanis while asking Islamabad for patience. Khawaja Asif has gone further, accusing the Afghan Taliban of aligning with India and backing anti-Pakistan groups. Whatever Kabul’s motives, the result is the same: its territory remains a launchpad, and its assurances remain empty.
When Diplomacy Runs Out
Diplomacy is a tool, not an end in itself. Its purpose is to secure outcomes, and in Pakistan’s case the required outcome was clear: an end to terrorism launched from Afghan soil. When years of engagement produce nothing measurable, a state has a duty to protect its citizens by other means. That is why, after diplomatic efforts failed, Pakistan launched Operation Ghazab lil-Haq against terrorist hideouts inside Afghanistan.
Pakistan’s door to dialogue is not closed. But the terms have changed. The era of protest letters and polite appeals is over. Any future talks must deliver written, verifiable guarantees and visible action against terrorist infrastructure. Pakistan has more than earned the right to insist on results, and the burden now rests entirely on Kabul.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
SAT Commentary
Recent
From Doha To Ürümqi, The Taliban Kept Stalling
Pakistan’s Diplomatic Efforts Versus Cross-Border Terrorism Since the Taliban returned to Kabul in August 2021, Pakistan has done exactly what a responsible neighbour is expected
BLA Leadership Change Exposes Internal Power Struggle
Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) announced through a press release that its commander, Bashir Zeb Baloch had been relieved of his command and “will no longer
Exported Instability: How Afghan Sanctuary Put Pakistan at the Top of the Global Terrorism Index
Pakistan recorded 1,045 terror incidents and 1,139 fatalities in 2025, placing it at the top of the Global Terrorism Index. This backgrounder by Irtija Ahmad examines how the Afghan Taliban’s return, cross-border safe havens, and abandoned US weaponry fueled this resurgence, refuting the narrative of self-inflicted instability.
Erosion of the Nuclear Taboo
American television journalist Tucker Carlson’s allegation that the Trump administration is only days away from launching a nuclear strike against Iran’s Pickaxe Mountain facility has
Defence Diplomacy
Originally published by Dawn. Featured by South Asia Times (SAT) for informational purposes, with attribution to the original author and publisher. When Saudi defence minister