Insurgency in Balochistan and Pakistan’s Security Concerns

Militant in Balochistan

Late assaults by the Baloch insurgents in Sibi, Kech, Panjgur, Noshki, and Kalat feature these insurgent entities’ developing refinement and worked on operational abilities. A strategic shift can be observed during these two of the three various conducted assaults by the suicide plans of the Baloch Liberation Army’s Majid Brigade’s self-sacrificing recruits (fidayees). The incessant utilization of suicide terrorism in Baloch insurgents’ assaults is an alarming and serious matter of concern for Pakistan. Meanwhile, the ongoing wave of insurgency and their streak of attacks in Balochistan have also busted the myth that the United States’ withdrawal from Afghanistan would debilitate the ongoing insurgency in Balochistan, by denying insurgents of their safe-houses and external support factor.

Despite the US pull-out from Afghanistan, the Baloch insurgents’ assaults have proceeded; the force and recurrence of these assaults have upgraded since then.

Resurgence of Baloch Insurgents 

The subtleties of the synchronized attacks in Panjgur and Noshki remain unclear. But all considerations point to the limitations of Balochistan insurgents launching high-profile attacks. Secondly, the situation of security threats in Quetta was pointing to another pre-planned attack, similar to the Panjgur and Noshki attacks (Operation Gangal), but the two failed smuggling efforts of a large amount of ammunition via Spinboldak disturbed their supply chain.

As per the recent statement of Jeeyand Baloch Spokesperson, BLA “The Baloch Liberation Army reiterates its commitment that our attacks will continue in full force”. The BLA is willing to proceed forward with another planned attack to continue their activities to give another push to  “Operation Ganjal”. Moreover After the Panjgur and Noshki attack, three attacks in Kalat by Brigade Majeed were also declared part of “Operation Ganjal.”

They look more prepared and better equipped now, with extremely modern weapons in their arsenal. Yet, it is impossible that such activities might have been conceivable without a solid internal and external supporting network. The intensification of the insurgency has faded with reports of gatherings of different Balochistan militant groups.

As the Interim Afghan Government is hunting down Islamic State – Khorasan Province (ISKP) in Afghanistan, the group has increasingly shifted its strategy towards Pakistan.

Lethal Inter-Organizational Cooperation

ISKP retains the uncanny ability to carry out high-profile attacks, both in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Despite the crackdown by Afghan Interim Government, the US withdrawal has worked in favor of ISKP. Meanwhile, Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) seem to be cooperating with each other. Though TTP has denounced ISKP, the spread of suicide attacks from Pakistan’s jihadist to ethno-separatist groups also points to inter-organizational learning and cooperation among various groups. The streak of attacks by insurgent groups and the recent wave of terrorism in Pakistan make security challenges apparent.

Where Does Afghanistan Stand?

Meanwhile, after the IEA’s takeover of Afghanistan, statements have been issued that they would not let any entity or state use the land of Afghanistan against Pakistan. But still, it remains a breeding ground for terrorist and ethnic insurgent groups involved in terrorism in Pakistan. These include TTP, ISKP, and Baloch separatist groups, such as; Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), Baloch Liberation Front (BLF), and Baloch Republic Front (BRF). Moreover, the spread of suicide attacks from Pakistan’s jihadist to ethno-separatist groups, and their inter-organizational learning and cooperation, mount the security concerns for Pakistan.

Rising Consortiums and CPEC

Regional geopolitics and competition have also played a major role in fueling the insurgency in Balochistan: Pakistan’s province that has been the focus of a regional power game for a long time.

The development of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and Gwadar Port has also intensified the debate. In regional geopolitics, border-sharing countries play a crucial role in the stability or instability of the region. As far as Iran is concerned, other than the “greater Balochistan movement,” the factor that indulged Iran into this regional power game is the “Gwadar vs Chabahar port”. At the same time, the nature and economic costs of the capitalist system put the two ports in competition with each other. While Iran is in a rush to attract more Chinese investment, Pakistan is concerned with maintaining peace and stability in Balochistan for Chinese assets and investments.

Pak-Iran Border

Aside from the geopolitical rivalry in the southwestern region of Pakistan with Iran, there is another factor that is contributing to the instability in Balochistan; that is the inefficiencies prevalent in the Iranian military to secure their land from being used against their neighbors. Pakistan has started the fencing of the border for quite some time, though some vulnerable points are still exploited by the insurgents of Balochistan to cross towards Iran and create safe havens there. Also, the Iranian military due to the sanctions imposed by the international community does not possess such sophisticated technology and necessary training which could hamper the creation of safe heavens by Baloch insurgents.

Balochistan cannot be called a battlefield. Although it shares porous borders with Iran and Afghanistan, it can be considered a wrestle-ring for insurgent groups, terrorist entities, and nations. At the same time, security concerns have grown in the province, where inter-organizational learning and cooperation, jihadists, and ethno-separatists are national security concerns. Only the fencing of borders from both sides and multilateral efforts of the regional countries such as Afghanistan and cooperation with Iran can bring down the uprising graph of suicide attacks and insurgent activities in Balochistan.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own. They do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.

Mehmood Ali

Mehmood Ali

Mehmood Ali, a research assistant at Balochistan Think Tank Network, is an award-winning young researcher specializing in South Asian Security Threat Matrix and Socioeconomic development. With a background in Security studies, he's well-versed in Militancy and Terrorism protocols. Ali previously served as a Research Fellow at South Asia Times and as a Research Intern at India Study Centre (ISSI). He can be contacted at X or @MEHMOODBALOCH75.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »