![TTP statements threaten PML-N, military-linked businesses, escalating tensions amid Pakistan’s political and security crisis. [Image via Dawn]](https://southasiatimes.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/010819104900109.webp)
Islamabad – In a series of alarming developments, the banned Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) issued two critical statements on January 5, signaling a dangerous shift in their operational strategy. The first of the two TTP statements, dubbed a “final warning,” targeted the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leadership, cautioning against the use of the term Fitna Al Khawarij—a label frequently employed by Pakistan and it’s military to describe the group. The TTP warned that failure to comply could result in direct attacks on PML-N leaders.
More significantly, the group announced an expansion of its targets to include military-linked businesses, explicitly naming entities like the National Logistics Cell (NLC), Frontier Works Organization (FWO), Askari Bank, Fauji Fertilizers, Pakistan Ordnance Factories, Fauji Foundation, Askari Fuels, and the Defence Housing Authority (DHA). The TTP’s declaration coincides with a recent boycott campaign led by social media accounts allegedly linked to supporters of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), raising eyebrows across political and security circles.
Also See: Fitna Al-Khawarij Revisited: Terrorism 2.0
Terrorist Rhetoric Mirrors Political Narratives
The echoes between the statements of the TTP and the PTI’s calls for boycotting military businesses have fueled speculation about overlapping agendas. Since PTI’s November 2024 protest in Islamabad, its supporters—particularly overseas—have been vocal in advocating a boycott of military-linked enterprises. While PTI leadership has distanced itself from these campaigns, their reluctance to denounce them unequivocally has left room for suspicion.
The alignment of TTP’s economic targets with PTI’s narrative is not unprecedented. Calls to scrutinize the military’s economic empire date back to the Lawyers’ Movement of 2007-2010 and gained traction with Ayesha Siddiqa’s seminal book, Military Inc. Over the years, groups like the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM), Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), and even the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) have echoed similar sentiments.
Economic Warfare: A New Front
The TTP’s strategy to undermine Pakistan’s economy by attacking military-linked businesses represents a dire escalation. Analysts warn that such actions will destabilize the broader economic environment, harming civilian livelihoods and social stability.
The group’s timeline gives a chilling ultimatum: it plans to target these entities within three months if its demands are not met.
Cross-Border Dynamics: Afghanistan in Focus
Complicating the domestic threat is Pakistan’s tense relationship with the Afghan Taliban-led government in Kabul. On January 4, Rana Sanaullah, Advisor to the Prime Minister, warned that Pakistan would not hesitate to conduct cross-border military operations in Afghanistan if TTP attacks persist. Citing recent airstrikes in Afghanistan’s Paktika province, Sanaullah asserted Pakistan’s right to self-defense under international law.
Meanwhile, Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khwaja Asif claimed that the Afghan Taliban requested for PKR 10 billion to transfer TTP terrorists within Afghanistan—A claim that was although denied by the Afghan Taliban but is indicative of the murky ties between Kabul and the TTP.
It is also notable that, despite official denials, the Afghan Taliban’s response to Pakistan’s actions has been defensive. Deputy Foreign Minister Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai condemned the precision strikes on TTP sites within Afghanistan. He labeled them as violations of sovereignty. This raises questions: Is the Taliban shielding the TTP, or are they simply unwilling to confront a shared ideological lineage?
Also See: Khawaja Asif says Taliban Requested $35.93 Million to ‘Relocate’ TTP
A Crisis in the Making
Former United States envoy to Afghanistan, Zalmay Khalilzad, summarized Pakistan’s precarious position as a “triple crisis” of political instability, economic challenges, and growing security threats. “Pakistan needs a reset. It must start with freedom for Imran Khan,” Khalilzad opined in a pointed statement.
While Islamabad grapples with internal challenges, Afghan officials must reckon with their own contradictions. Deputy Foreign Minister Stanikzai’s sentimental rhetoric about TTP belies Kabul’s insistence that the group operates independently. “If TTP isn’t their problem, why do they speak as though they own them?” Remarked Director SAT Salman Javed on social media platform X responding to the Deputy Minister’s post.
The Ugly Reality of Escalation
As tensions escalate, officials on both sides must tread cautiously. “A missile doesn’t distinguish between rhetoric and reality,” a senior Pakistani defense source noted. “If this turns into an all-out conflict, the consequences will be ugly—not good, not bad, just ugly.”
Pakistan’s strikes are carefully calibrated against TTP camps, they are not against Afghanistan or its people, but Kabul’s reaction suggests deeper insecurities. “Why is the Taliban more hurt than TTP?” the official questioned.
Pakistan’s Position: Restraint or Retaliation?
While Islamabad emphasizes restraint, it warns that repeated provocations will invite full-scale retaliation. “If Afghanistan sides with TTP, Pakistan will respond decisively. Someone in Kabul needs to remember their history,” the official added, hinting at Pakistan’s enduring ties to the region’s legacy.
The TTP’s latest moves, combined with Afghanistan’s ambivalence, have pushed Pakistan into a critical juncture. The stakes are high—not just for the military or government but for the nation’s social and economic fabric. The road ahead demands clarity, unity, and resolve to counter threats that seek to undermine Pakistan’s sovereignty and stability.
