Pannun claims Indian ‘spy network’ operates in US and Canada

A Sikh separatist claims India's consulates run a 'spy network' in US and Canada amid allegations of assassination plots.

Canada and the U.S. must adopt a tougher stance against Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government. They should do this for attempting to silence dissidents on foreign soil. Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, a controversial Sikh separatist and the target of an alleged India-led murder plot, stated this in an interview. Pannun, a dual U.S.-Canadian citizen, claimed that India’s consulates in the U.S. and Canada operate a “spy network in US and Canada.” However, he did not provide any proof.

The U.S. Justice Department has unsealed indictments against two Indian nationals in connection with an alleged plot to kill Pannun in New York. The two accused include an ex-government official, who the indictment said worked as an intelligence officer at the time and had orchestrated the assassination plan

Pannun told Reuters earlier this month that the Modi government should not conduct hostile activities in foreign countries. He claimed that India’s consulates in the U.S. and Canada run a “spy network,” although he did not provide any proof.

He said that the U.S. and Canada “need to put their foot down and ensure that regimes like Modi’s should not come to America or Canada, challenge their sovereignty, and get away with it. They need to take a firm stance and close the consulates permanently.”

Pannun did not elaborate on the alleged spy network. Similar assertions have been made by Sikh activists in America and Canada.

India’s foreign ministry did not respond to detailed questions from Reuters regarding Pannun’s allegations. India, where Pannun was born, has labelled him a terrorist since 2020.

Authorities in the U.S. and Canada declined comment on Pannun’s allegations.

Diplomatic Tensions and Assassination Plots

The U.S. and Canada have alleged that Indian agents were involved in assassination plots in their countries last year. These plots targeted campaigners for ‘Khalistan,’ a Sikh homeland that some seek to carve out of India’s Punjab state. Sikh militancy in the 1980s and 1990s killed thousands of people in that region.

India has denied involvement in any of the plots.

The allegations have damaged India’s ties with Canada and tested relations between Washington and New Delhi.

Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has accused India’s government of involvement in the 2023 murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, another Sikh separatist leader in Canada. In May, Canadian police arrested and charged four Indian men for the murder. They are yet to be tried.

India has said Canada has not provided any evidence to support its allegations and New Delhi and Ottawa expelled six diplomats each earlier this month in a growing diplomatic spat.

Investigation into the Murder Plot

However, India has said it is investigating the murder plot against Pannun and U.S. officials have said they want a speedy result.

Pannun said that Vikash Yadav, the former Indian official indicted by the U.S. for the alleged attempt on his life, was just a “middle-tier soldier.” He claimed that higher-level Indian officials assigned Yadav the task of organizing the assassination. He did not offer any proof nor say how he had come to the conclusion.

New Delhi has stated that Yadav is no longer a government employee. However, they did not confirm whether he had been an intelligence officer or specify when he left. Yadav’s whereabouts remain unknown. His family informed Reuters earlier this month that he had been in contact and denied the allegations in the U.S. indictment.

Rise of Khalistan Support

Indian security officials have said they fear that a rise in support for Khalistan overseas may lead to resurgence of militancy that had previously paralysed Punjab state, the birthplace of Sikh nationalism, where the movement for a separate homeland now commands little support.

Pannun has been holding independent referendums in the U.S., Canada, and Europe on creating Khalistan. In the interview, he stated that his movement advocates a peaceful resolution to the matter. He also expressed that the movement will continue despite threats to his life.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »