Pak-Afghan Looking Forward to Istanbul Conference

The upcoming Istanbul Conference, according to Pakistani and Afghan foreign ministers, will help make the current Afghan peace process \”result-oriented.\”

Pakistan FM Calls Afghan FM

Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi and his Afghan counterpart Mohammad Hanif Atmar shared a conversation. They spoke on the phone about the recent developments and success in the intra-Afghan dialogue. According to a statement from Pakistan\’s Foreign Ministry, it will put an end to the country\’s decades-long conflict.

Qureshi, who is currently in UAE for a three-day visit, expressed hope that the Istanbul Conference will help to bring lasting peace to Afghanistan and make the 2020 Doha peace agreement more result-oriented.

He reiterated Islamabad\’s support for the peace talks, saying a stable Afghanistan is in Pakistan\’s best interests. For his part, Atmar praised Islamabad\’s ongoing \”diplomatic, democratic, and spiritual\” contributions to the Afghan peace process. According to the release, the two top diplomats decided to meet during the meeting. Soon after the Istanbul summit, Qureshi welcomed Atmar to Islamabad.

Pakistan’s Role in the Talks

Subsequently, since last September, the Islamabad-brokered peace talks in Doha intended to end decades of conflict. It aimed to pave the way for a post-war Afghan society. However, it hasn\’t made any progress.

Moreover, Pakistan, which has a lot of clout with the Taliban, is looking forward to the upcoming Afghan peace conference. The conference will be held in Istanbul, Turkey. Pakistan hopes that it will be a good chance for Afghan leaders to make strides toward a negotiated political settlement. Islamabad set up direct talks between the US and the Taliban in December 2018, opening the way for the 2020 peace agreement.

Call to Turkish Foreign Minister

In a phone call with Atmar on Thursday, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlüt avuşolu briefed him on recent NATO talks in which the allies decided to withdraw their troops from Afghanistan by September 11.

Biden’s Plan

Though military advisors urged a troop buildup to fight Taliban advances, Biden was a lone voice in the Obama administration, advising the 44th president to move toward a narrower counterterrorism mission in the region.

Furthermore, in regards to the current situation, Biden has stated certain remarks regarding the US\’s foreign policy. Biden suggested that the policy has to be re-calibrated. This will ultimately deal with the greater threats faced by China and Russia.

Lastly, withdrawing all US troops carries significant risks. It could help the Taliban reclaim authority and reverse decades of progress in democracy and women\’s rights. It also exposes Biden to attacks from Republicans and some Democrats, including the fact that former President Donald Trump had wished for a complete withdrawal as well.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »