Is Kashmir Solidarity Day Enough?

Background

What does Kashmir Solidarity Day truly mean for Pakistan – beyond mere rituals and annual observances. As February 5th arrives, it is imperative for Pakistanis to confront uncomfortable questions regarding their commitment to Kashmir. The journey from impassioned calls in 1975 to the present demands introspection.

In the frosty winter of 1975, a spark ignited in Pakistan, setting in motion a call for solidarity with Kashmiris. Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s impassioned voice rallied the nation for a wheel jam protest against India’s occupation following a breakthrough Indira-Abdullah accord on Kashmir.

Fast forward to 1990, and the concept of Kashmir Day emerged, initiated by Qazi Hussain Ahmad and Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. What started nationally evolved into a global movement, culminating in February 5 becoming a national holiday.

Over the years, the struggle in Kashmir intensified, witnessing unspeakable atrocities – 96,000 lives lost, 23,000 women widowed, and over 11,000 women and girls raped – tearing apart the very fabric of Kashmiri society, with 100,000 homes, schools, and houses demolished. These figures, reported in the media, may only scratch the surface of the grim reality.

In 2019, India’s controversial move to revoke Article 370 shook the region, leading to a blackout, a surge in armed forces, and an altered demographic landscape.

As Kashmir Solidarity Day is observed today, it calls for reflection beyond speeches, social media campaigns, and annual rituals.

What does this solidarity truly mean? The day should prompt deep introspection into the soul of the relationship with Kashmir.

The youth, the heartbeat of any nation, can redefine this solidarity. Engaging in dialogue, organizing seminars, and using social media as a tool for connection can amplify the Kashmiri struggle. It’s not just a day for speeches but a call for meaningful action, for understanding, and for an untiring commitment to the cause.

As the world witnesses the transformation of the Kashmir conflict through digital media, Pakistan, as a diplomatic supporter, must step up. Investing in research institutes, fostering inclusive discussions, and empowering the youth to be ambassadors of change – these are the steps toward a more substantial and lasting solidarity.

This Kashmir Solidarity Day should not be a moment of fleeting emotion but a sustained commitment to justice. Amidst slogans and ceremonies, are Pakistanis truly standing with Kashmir? Are they contributing to meaningful change, or are they merely echoing the same sentiments year after year?

Let 5th February 2024 not be just another day on the calendar. It’s a day for renewed commitment, a day when every Pakistani, especially the youth, actively participates in the cause – not just for one day, but every day, making every day a Kashmir Solidarity Day.

Today, it’s time for Pakistanis to face some uncomfortable realities. Will this day merely echo the familiar slogan, “Kashmir se humara rishta kya, La Ilaha IllAllah,” or can they move beyond rhetoric to concrete action?

The dilution of Article 370 by the Narendra Modi government reshaped the landscape of Jammu and Kashmir. Shouldn’t every day in Pakistan be a Kashmir Solidarity Day since that historic change? The recent inauguration of the Ram Mandir at the site of the demolished Babri mosque signals a shift in India’s secular fabric. As freedoms shrink for non-Hindus in Bharat, the altered demography of Kashmir becomes a poignant concern, a slow transformation that demands attention.

Year after year, Kashmir Solidarity Day passes with celebrations, but is it more than just a day of reassurance that Kashmir is Pakistan’s jugular vein? Amidst the repetitive chants, have Pakistanis become numb to the urgency of the Kashmiri struggle? The promises that one day Kashmir will be part of Pakistan – is it merely a soothing mantra?

How does the average Pakistani perceive Kashmir Solidarity Day? Is it merely a day off, spent on leisure activities, flooded with an abundance of “free Kashmir” messages and enticing sale offers from home and clothing outlets? If their engagement is limited to speeches, advocacy in international forums, and the organization of seminars and conferences, are they genuinely doing everything within their capacity for Kashmir?

Have they ever questioned their leaders about the status of the Kashmir policy – at the state level, the provincial level, or within their communities? With General Elections on the horizon in a few days, is there any political group that has explicitly prioritized the Kashmir policy in their manifesto?

The need of the hour is to involve the common Pakistani in a meaningful process. Beyond slogans, can Pakistan engage the public in a dialogue that goes beyond a single day? Is it time to transform Kashmir Solidarity Day from a mere ritual into a continuous effort, involving every citizen in understanding, advocating, and actively participating in the cause?

As we approach this Kashmir Solidarity Day, let’s question our collective conscience. Can Pakistan move beyond the comfort of familiar gestures and truly stand in solidarity with Kashmir? It’s time for introspection, action, and a commitment that goes beyond a single day on the calendar.

SAT Editorial Desk

Your go-to editorial hub for policy perspectives and informed analysis on pressing regional and global issues.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »