The South Asia Times (SAT) hosted a national webinar titled “From the Periphery to the Center: What People at Our Margins Endure,” spotlighting how Pakistan’s border regions, Balochistan, Gilgit-Baltistan, Azad Jammu & Kashmir, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, face deep-rooted governance challenges, economic neglect, and communication voids. Experts called for shifting from a security-centric to an inclusion-driven policy model to rebuild trust, empower youth, and turn Pakistan’s peripheries into engines of national resilience.
Book Review: The Return Of The Taliban Afghanistan After The US Left
Summary of the Book
The book “The Return of the Taliban” tells the story of how the Afghan Taliban returned to power in August 2021. It emphasizes the events leading up to the signing of the Doha Agreement. The book also covers the events that followed the deal. Additionally, it explores the various challenges the Afghan Taliban face in the post-withdrawal phase. These challenges range from a crippling economy to the threat of ISKP. It is a fascinating account about the rivalries that have grappled the Afghan Taliban internally since long.
Last but not least, the book enumerates how the Taliban has evolved from their first stint in power in the 1990s. It especially focuses on their engagement with the outside world.
Strengths of the Book
The book has several strengths that make it unique in its own right. The first strength of “The Return of the Taliban” lies in the sources the author consulted. Hassan Abbas is well cognizant of the importance of sources in non-fictional and scholarly work. He has extensively consulted a wide range of primary sources. These include interviews with key officials from Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the United States. The high-ranking officials he interviewed include officers from the upper echelons of the Pakistan army and ISI, Afghan Taliban officials, and US diplomats. These individuals possessed first-hand knowledge of the ground realities about the subject matter of the book.
In contrast to the common perception, mostly popularized by those who have not read the book, it is not entirely negative about the Afghan Taliban. A careful reading reveals that the book presents a balanced account of the group. The author has highlighted the dark side of the Afghan Taliban on several occasions. However, following the principle of “give credit where it is due,” the author has also expressed appreciation for certain aspects of the Taliban. For instance, while discussing the moral corruption of the former chief Mullah Akhtar Mansour, the author has also acknowledged the moral integrity of Mullah Omar and the incumbent chief Mullah Hibatullah Akhundzada.
Also See: The Taliban Recognition Conundrum
Weaknesses of the Book
Like any other book, “The Return of the Taliban” exhibits a few weaknesses. Readers must consider these weaknesses alongside its strengths.
In the introduction of the book, Hassan claims that after the Doha peace deal, Afghan President Ashraf Ghani became quite conspiratorial. Hassan reveals that Ghani was convinced his political adversaries were colluding to remove him from office. These adversaries included former president Hamid Karzai, Abdullah Abdullah, and Zalmay Khalilzad. Ghani believed they were facilitating the Taliban’s seizure of Kabul, with Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar as their supreme leader. To preempt their plan, Ghani shared critical security information with rival Taliban leader Sirajuddin Haqqani. This enabled Haqqani’s faction to enter Kabul ahead of the others. Another weakness of the book is pertaining to the style in which it has been written. It sounds more like a journalistic book rather than an academic one.
Conclusion
Despite the weaknesses of the book discussed above, it provides a valuable insight into the post-withdrawal Afghanistan. Hassan Abbas’s “The Return of the Taliban” is indeed a significant addition to the existing corpus of knowledge on Afghanistan after the Taliban takeover. While acknowledging its limitations, the book is an important resource for anyone seeking a comprehensive understanding of Afghanistan under the rule of the Afghan Taliban.
Azhar Zeeshan
Azhar Zeeshan
Azhar Zeeshan is a researcher at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS) Lahore, Pakistan. He can be reached at info@casslhr.com
Recent
From The Periphery to the Center: What People at Our Margins Endure
The South Asia Times (SAT) hosted a national webinar titled “From the Periphery to the Center: What People at Our Margins Endure,” spotlighting how Pakistan’s border regions, Balochistan, Gilgit-Baltistan, Azad Jammu & Kashmir, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, face deep-rooted governance challenges, economic neglect, and communication voids. Experts called for shifting from a security-centric to an inclusion-driven policy model to rebuild trust, empower youth, and turn Pakistan’s peripheries into engines of national resilience.
The Indian Muslim: Living Between Faith and Fear
In September 2025, a simple expression of faith became a crime. When a devotional social media trend, the ‘I Love Muhammad’ campaign, went viral, it was deliberately framed as a provocation by authorities. The state’s response was swift and brutal: mass arrests and punitive demolitions that turned a peaceful act of devotion into a national flashpoint, revealing a clear intent to police and punish Muslim identity itself.
Pakistan’s Stability: A Silent Pillar of US Strategic Interests
Long seen through a security lens, Pakistan is now redefining its role in US strategy, as a supplier of critical minerals, a connectivity hub between Central and South Asia, and a stabilizing force in a volatile region. Amid global competition with China and shifting energy dynamics, Washington increasingly views Pakistan’s stability not as a choice but as a strategic necessity anchoring its economic and geopolitical interests across Asia.
The Nobel Peace Prize or War Prize? A History of Controversial Laureates
Far from being an impartial recognition of pacifism, the Nobel Peace Prize’s legacy is marred by controversial laureates whose actions have been linked to immense violence. The prize is not a universal arbiter of peace but a political instrument reflecting a Western-centric worldview, rewarding figures who align with its geopolitical interests, regardless of the blood on their hands.
Eighty Years Later: Is the United Nations Becoming the League of Nations 2.0?
Eighty years after the UN’s creation to “save succeeding generations from war,” the organization stands at a breaking point. With veto paralysis, waning U.S. commitment, and global disillusionment, is the UN becoming the very institution it replaced—the League of Nations 2.0?