Upendra Dwivedi’s ‘Blame Pakistan’ Game: Will It Ever End

Indian Army Chief Gen Dwivedi's blame on Pakistan for Kashmir terrorism falls apart as evidence reveals India's own role in destabilizing the region. [Image via Press Trust of India]

Same script, different day—will the cycle of accusations ever end?

India’s recent claims by Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi, accusing Pakistan of being the “epicenter of terrorism” in Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), stand in stark contrast to well-documented facts. Such allegations are not just misleading but serve as a smokescreen for India’s own state-sponsored terrorism in IIOJK, where Indian security forces routinely engage in extrajudicial killings, torture, and other human rights abuses. India’s military presence in Kashmir has long been associated with daily atrocities against innocent civilians, which international human rights organizations have extensively documented.

Dwivedi’s accusations reflect a growing frustration within India’s military leadership, attempting to deflect attention from the improprieties of their own actions onto. His statements underscore India’s inability to address the root causes of violence in Kashmir, opting instead to falsely attribute all the region’s instability to external forces.

Dwivedi’s persistent ‘Blame Pakistan’ rhetoric not only lacks substance but also detracts from the pressing need for India to introspect its policies in IIOJK and beyond.

Also See: The Kashmir Tragedy: A Genocide Ignored

Why Indian General Upendra Dwivedi’s ‘Blame Pakistan’ Game Don’t Hold Up

Let’s take a look at the data-driven reality:

  • Pakistan’s credible counterterrorism measures are evident in its removal from the FATF Grey List in October 2022, showcasing robust reforms in Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter Financing of Terrorism (CFT), disproving India’s baseless allegations.
  • International recognition of Pakistan’s efforts in counterterrorism further debunks India’s narrative. The country’s 2020 Dossier, detailing India’s links to terrorist groups like BLA, BRA, BLF, and TTP, is a testament to India’s role in destabilizing its neighbors—a clear strategy to undermine Pakistan’s sovereignty and economic stability.
  • India’s judicial failures in cases like the Samjhauta Express blast (2007) and Gujarat riots (2002) reflect its systemic failure to hold extremists accountable. In a particularly telling move, Swami Aseemanand, the mastermind behind the Samjhauta attack that killed 43 Pakistanis, was acquitted by an Indian court, exposing India’s tolerance for extremism.
  • The 26/11 Mumbai attacks trial, where India withheld critical evidence to hinder Pakistan’s judicial process, further strengthens the case that India uses terror as a political tool to malign its neighbors.
  • RAW agent Kulbhushan Jadhav’s arrest in Pakistan for espionage and terrorism adds irrefutable evidence of India’s direct involvement in subversive activities aimed at destabilizing Pakistan.

India’s sponsorship of militants targeting CPEC projects further exposes its desire to derail regional connectivity and economic progress. This disruption is part of a broader strategy to thwart Pakistan’s economic growth and maintain regional hegemony.

In light of these revelations, India must reform its own counterterrorism framework and stop making baseless accusations against Pakistan. It is crucial for the international community to hold India accountable for its destabilizing actions and its disinformation campaign against Pakistan. Global oversight should compel India to cease using terrorism as a political weapon and push for a genuine commitment to peace and security in South Asia.

SAT Commentaries’ are social media threads by various authors, reproduced here for website use. Views are their own.

SAT Commentary

SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.

Recent

What is the Durand Line?

What is Durand Line?

The Durand Line, a 2,670-kilometer border drawn in 1893 between Afghanistan and British India, remains one of South Asia’s many contentious frontiers. Rejected by every Afghan government but recognized internationally, it symbolizes the region’s colonial legacy and ongoing power struggles. This backgrounder explores its origins in the Great Game, the legal and political controversies surrounding it, and its lasting impact on Pakistan-Afghanistan relations and regional security.

Read More »
Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

For over two decades, Pakistan has battled the scourge of terrorism. Yet, despite military successes, the absence of political consensus continues to jeopardize lasting peace. As divisions deepen and populist narratives gain ground, the question remains: can Pakistan truly defeat terror without unity at the top?

Read More »
Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

The world is entering an era of multipolar pragmatism where ideology no longer defines alliances. From NATO’s internal divides to BRICS expansion and regional realignments, states now pursue transactional partnerships driven by national interests. This fluid diplomacy creates both opportunities for middle powers and uncertainty in global governance.

Read More »
Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Pakistan is witnessing a sharp rise in terrorist attacks linked to the Afghan Taliban’s support for the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). A new study reveals that Afghan nationals now dominate TTP infiltration groups, exposing Kabul’s complicity in cross-border militancy. As violence escalates, Islamabad must balance border control, diplomacy, and de-radicalisation to counter

Read More »
The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

Any hope surrounding the Pakistan–Afghanistan dialogue in Doha is colliding with renewed violence and mutual distrust. Pakistan’s recent precision strikes in Paktika, following a shattered ceasefire and terrorist attacks, signal a shift toward active defense. The talks now hinge on whether Kabul can curb militant sanctuaries and move beyond its victim narrative.

Read More »