Upendra Dwivedi’s ‘Blame Pakistan’ Game: Will It Ever End

Indian Army Chief Gen Dwivedi's blame on Pakistan for Kashmir terrorism falls apart as evidence reveals India's own role in destabilizing the region. [Image via Press Trust of India]

Same script, different day—will the cycle of accusations ever end?

India’s recent claims by Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi, accusing Pakistan of being the “epicenter of terrorism” in Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), stand in stark contrast to well-documented facts. Such allegations are not just misleading but serve as a smokescreen for India’s own state-sponsored terrorism in IIOJK, where Indian security forces routinely engage in extrajudicial killings, torture, and other human rights abuses. India’s military presence in Kashmir has long been associated with daily atrocities against innocent civilians, which international human rights organizations have extensively documented.

Dwivedi’s accusations reflect a growing frustration within India’s military leadership, attempting to deflect attention from the improprieties of their own actions onto. His statements underscore India’s inability to address the root causes of violence in Kashmir, opting instead to falsely attribute all the region’s instability to external forces.

Dwivedi’s persistent ‘Blame Pakistan’ rhetoric not only lacks substance but also detracts from the pressing need for India to introspect its policies in IIOJK and beyond.

Also See: The Kashmir Tragedy: A Genocide Ignored

Why Indian General Upendra Dwivedi’s ‘Blame Pakistan’ Game Don’t Hold Up

Let’s take a look at the data-driven reality:

  • Pakistan’s credible counterterrorism measures are evident in its removal from the FATF Grey List in October 2022, showcasing robust reforms in Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter Financing of Terrorism (CFT), disproving India’s baseless allegations.
  • International recognition of Pakistan’s efforts in counterterrorism further debunks India’s narrative. The country’s 2020 Dossier, detailing India’s links to terrorist groups like BLA, BRA, BLF, and TTP, is a testament to India’s role in destabilizing its neighbors—a clear strategy to undermine Pakistan’s sovereignty and economic stability.
  • India’s judicial failures in cases like the Samjhauta Express blast (2007) and Gujarat riots (2002) reflect its systemic failure to hold extremists accountable. In a particularly telling move, Swami Aseemanand, the mastermind behind the Samjhauta attack that killed 43 Pakistanis, was acquitted by an Indian court, exposing India’s tolerance for extremism.
  • The 26/11 Mumbai attacks trial, where India withheld critical evidence to hinder Pakistan’s judicial process, further strengthens the case that India uses terror as a political tool to malign its neighbors.
  • RAW agent Kulbhushan Jadhav’s arrest in Pakistan for espionage and terrorism adds irrefutable evidence of India’s direct involvement in subversive activities aimed at destabilizing Pakistan.

India’s sponsorship of militants targeting CPEC projects further exposes its desire to derail regional connectivity and economic progress. This disruption is part of a broader strategy to thwart Pakistan’s economic growth and maintain regional hegemony.

In light of these revelations, India must reform its own counterterrorism framework and stop making baseless accusations against Pakistan. It is crucial for the international community to hold India accountable for its destabilizing actions and its disinformation campaign against Pakistan. Global oversight should compel India to cease using terrorism as a political weapon and push for a genuine commitment to peace and security in South Asia.

SAT Commentaries’ are social media threads by various authors, reproduced here for website use. Views are their own.

SAT Commentary

SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.

Recent

Pakistan’s shift from arms importer to defense exporter reveals how indigenous military industry has become central to sovereignty in a fragmented global order.

Pakistan’s Defense Industrial Breakout

As the liberal international order fragments, Pakistan has executed a decisive shift from defense dependency to indigenous production. Through exports, combat validation, and joint industrialization, Islamabad is redefining sovereignty as an industrial and diplomatic asset.

Read More »
A critical reassessment of Afghan repatriation from Pakistan, weighing human rights advocacy against state sovereignty, security, and legal realities.

Rethinking Afghan Repatriation from Pakistan

Amnesty International’s call to halt Afghan repatriation overlooks the limits of long-term hospitality. For Pakistan, the issue is less about abandoning rights than reasserting sovereign immigration control amid shifting realities in Afghanistan.

Read More »
Andy Halus’s interview signals a shift in US–Pakistan relations toward minerals, education, and soft power, marking a post-security partnership in 2026.

The New Architecture of US–Pakistan Relations

Andy Halus’s interview signals a strategic shift in US–Pakistan relations from security-centric ties to a multidimensional partnership centered on minerals, education, and soft power. Projects like Reko Diq now stand as the key test of this new architecture.

Read More »