Troop Withdrawal from Afghanistan and Iran Nuclear Deal – Challenges for Biden Administration

When Biden came to power early this year, he faced more external issues than internal issues. The country was on the brink of either war or peace. The controversial yet sudden decision of the past administration of Trump has put Biden in the 5th gear without a steady charge.

A Headache for Biden Administration 

Two issues that he faced were were the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan and Iran Nuclear Crisis. Both of these issues were actually solved and disrupted in one way or the other by the previous administration. Trump promised the Taliban on February 29th 2020, a hasty withdrawal by 1st May 2021. Fully knowing that Trump won’t be in the next election and it’s a headache for the upcoming administration.

The Iran nuclear crisis was rather a sleeping lion in a cage that was disturbed by a young dumb child who threw a stone because he wanted to see it roar. In 2018, Trump pulled out of Iran Nuclear deal 2015, which actually restricted Iran’s nuclear ambitions and lifted sanctions from Iran.

Now one might say that Trump was genius to make the Taliban sit at the table and negotiate peace, while simultaneously show the iron to Iran. Almost every international politics analyst agree that both are a headache for Biden Administration but it’s not that hard to solve, unlike that of fleeing from Vietnam or hasty withdrawal from Iraq. There’s a catch and that is, ‘use the same allies that helped trump in these issues’.

US Troop Withdrawal

Now we all know that the Afghan war has exhausted the US’ resources and capital. Therefore the US is looking for a withdrawal from this hellhole. Typically, For Biden, it\’s simple to utilize the very same countries and sources that helped lead to the Peace Agreement of 2020. Stakeholders like Russia, Iran, Pakistan, China, UAE, and KSA are in favour of peace in Afghanistan. A process with a complete comprehensive political consensus that includes the Taliban in the mainstream politics of Afghanistan.

Utilizing the very same countries for the same problem. We recently saw that there were series of talks. The talk occurred just after the Blinken letter. Similarly, then there were consecutive visits by US and Russian representatives. After which there were meetings between major stakeholders that have led to the decision of US withdrawal by 11th September. A day that is and will be remembered by many.

Iran Nuclear Deal

In 2018, when Trump pulled out of the Iran Nuclear Deal. Ultimately Tehran opted to follow the same path. The US didn’t only pull out but also imposed additional sanction, bring Iran to a near-crippling economy. Trump thought that this would lead to rebel groups rising in Iran and making Iran surrender. Although, instead, Iran went to the exact same spot for which Nuclear Deal was made to prevent it. Iran enriched its uranium to a dangerous level of 60%. On the other hand, to make bombs, 90% is the standard.

Recently, peace with Saudi Arabia and revival of talks with Iran by the USA have shown a ray of hope. However, the proxy wars between the US most vital ally in the region, KSA, and Iran still remains unanswered and unsolved. The utilization of resources in Tel Aviv and Riyadh are the only source to produce a solution. A solution for this dangerous problem.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »