Taliban Challenged Biden for Late Withdrawal of Forces

The Taliban have declared victory over the United States and are planning to strike NATO forces in Afghanistan. As a result of President Biden breaking a promise to withdraw US troops by the beginning of May.

Biden said yesterday that all foreign forces will be out of the country by September 11. The withdrawal will effectively end America\’s longest war. Twenty years from today, the deadliest terrorist attacks on American soil sparked George W Bush\’s war on terror.

The date of withdrawal is very symbolic, affiliated with the 9/11 incident. However, it is still four months late than the date promised by the Trump administration. Trump promised to pull out 2,500 soldiers by 1st May.

Resultantly, the Taliban have challenged, Joe Biden, saying, \”We will defeat you and take over in Afghanistan.\”

Do the Taliban Secure more Power than the Afghan Government?:

To an extent, this statement of Taliban is true. To put it into perspective, we should see what the local Taliban commanders have to say regarding the situation. Haji Hekmat, Taliban commander, in Balkh district near Mazar e Sharif said in an interview, “the government forces are just there by the main market, but they can\’t leave their bases. This territory belongs to the mujahedeen\”

Across most of Afghanistan, the government dominates the cities and larger towns. On the other hand, the Taliban encircles them and has a foothold in vast parts of the countryside. The Taliban\’s have used this strategy since the USSR invaded Afghanistan. The Soviets never considered the dominance of the rural region in Afghanistan. The Soviets used to boast about their advances in major cities and neglect the power resting in rural areas.

Afghanistan’s main developments took place in urban areas that stopped locals from joining the Taliban, but a large part of rural areas was pushed further into poverty and this gave rebel groups and the Taliban an opportunity to recruit more people, frustrated out of poverty.

The Dominance of Taliban in Afghanistan:

The statement of victory by the Taliban can also be seen in such context that Afghan National Army is not as professional as its enemy Taliban is. According to several reports, ANA lacks not only professional training but also logistics and equipment. On the other hand, the Taliban have been pushing back the NATO coalition as well as ANA in several battles.

Militants demonstrate their dominance by setting up occasional checkpoints along major thoroughfares. Aamir Sahib Ajmal, the local leader of the Taliban\’s intelligence service, informs us they\’re looking for individuals connected to the government as Taliban members stop and query passing vehicles.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Centralized Power and the Core–Periphery Divide in Afghanistan

Centralized Power and the Core–Periphery Divide in Afghanistan

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan’s return in 2021 brought rapid consolidation of power, but also the revival of a historical flaw. By concentrating authority in the hands of southern Pashtun elites, the Taliban have recreated the core–periphery divide that has destabilized every Afghan regime since the 19th century. This hyper-centralization, rooted in ethnic exclusivity and Kandahar dominance, risks a repeat of past collapses as non-Pashtun regions turn toward functional autonomy.

Read More »
Broken Promises: The Taliban’s Betrayal of Global Commitments

Broken Promises: The Taliban’s Betrayal of Global Commitments

Nearly three years after seizing power, the Taliban’s systematic violation of their international commitments under the 2020 Doha Accord has transformed Afghanistan into a sanctuary for terrorism, entrenched an autocratic regime, and institutionalized gender apartheid. Beyond moral failure, this deceit poses a grave threat to regional stability, international counterterrorism efforts, and the credibility of global diplomacy. Holding the regime accountable is now a strategic necessity, not a choice.

Read More »
Do You Remember 6/11/ 1947?: A Forgotten Jammu Genocide and the Continuing Erasure of Kashmiriyat

Do You Remember 6/11/ 1947?: A Forgotten Jammu Genocide and the Continuing Erasure of Kashmiriyat

On November 6, 1947, one of South Asia’s earliest genocides unfolded in Jammu, where hundreds of thousands of Muslims were massacred or forced to flee. Yet, unlike other global tragedies, this atrocity remains buried in silence. The Jammu Genocide not only reshaped the region’s demography but laid the foundation for India’s ongoing campaign of identity erasure in Kashmir. From demographic engineering to cultural censorship, the spirit of Kashmiriyat continues to face systematic annihilation.

Read More »
India’s Climate Policy after COP28: Net Zero 2070 — A Fair Promise or a Risky Postponement?

India’s Climate Policy after COP28: Net Zero 2070 — A Fair Promise or a Risky Postponement?

India’s Net Zero 2070 target reflects a delicate balance between development equity and climate urgency. While progress in renewables, green finance, and adaptation is visible, the absence of clear interim milestones risks turning ambition into delay. The real challenge lies in translating a distant horizon into measurable, near-term climate action before 2030.

Read More »
The Tehreek-e-Hijrat of 1920 and Its Parallels with Contemporary Refugee Politics

The Tehreek-e-Hijrat of 1920 and Its Parallels with Contemporary Refugee Politics

The Tehreek-e-Hijrat of 1920 saw thousands of Indian Muslims migrate to Afghanistan, only to be turned away when Kabul could no longer cope. A century later, Afghan officials criticise Pakistan’s refugee policies while ignoring their own historical refusal to host Muslim migrants. The parallel reveals not just irony, but the enduring challenge of compassion, capacity, and collective responsibility.

Read More »