Nearly 3,500 Afghans Killed or Hurt in First Half of 2020, UN

Despite a pact between the United States and Taliban militants, fighting continues to rage in Afghanistan. The UN estimates that over 1,280 Afghan civilians have been killed in the first six months of the year 2020.

The U.N. Assistance Mission in Afghanistan state that 1,282 Afghans have been killed and another 2,176 maimed or injured for a tally of 3,458 civilian casualties.

“The reality remains that Afghanistan\’s a deadly place in the world for civilians,” said UNAMA in its mid-year report.

Harrowing figures

Casualties have dropped by 13% from the corresponding period last year. The Taliban were responsible for 43% of all civilian casualties. Moreover, the causes of death are mainly explosive devices, abductions, and executions. Furthermore, the government forces caused 23%, primarily by airstrikes and indirect fire during operations. The UNAMA attributed the decrease to fewer operations by international forces, as well as fewer attacks by Islamic State militants.

Reasons for these claims

In February, the United States and Taliban signed an agreement in Doha.The withdrawal of foreign forces from Afghanistan state in exchange for security guarantees from the militants is in process. However, fighting has spiked in recent weeks. Prompted by differences over a prisoner exchange between the Taliban and Afghan government. Kabul proved reluctant to free hundreds of jailed militants.

The Doha deal provided for Kabul to release 5,000 Taliban prisoners in exchange for hundreds of Afghan troops. This was the main plank in starting peace negotiations between the two sides in the effort to put a stop to the 18-year-old war. While Kabul has released more than 4,000 Taliban prisoners, it has refused to release another 600. Claiming their involvement in murders, illicit drug trafficking, and major attacks.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Afghanistan’s Trade Boycott: Strategic Miscalculation With Fiscal Consequences

Afghanistan’s Trade Boycott: Strategic Miscalculation With Fiscal Consequences

Afghanistan’s 2025 trade boycott of Pakistan exposes a strategic miscalculation. Despite efforts to shift toward Iran and Central Asia, Kabul remains structurally dependent on Pakistan’s mature trade corridors, customs revenue, labour mobility, and logistical efficiency. Alternative routes carry higher costs, sanctions risks, and operational delays, leaving the Taliban with mounting fiscal losses and regional constraints.

Read More »
The Defund Taliban Campaign

The Defund Taliban Campaign

The Defund Taliban Campaign examines how indirect US funding and a $7 billion abandoned arsenal have turned the Taliban into a regional force multiplier for militant groups.

Read More »
The Taliban’s new fatwa banning foreign militancy signals a shift in doctrine, but rising regional attacks and ideological fractures raise questions about its enforceability.

Doctrine vs Reality: Can the Taliban Enforce Their Ban on Foreign Militants?

The Taliban’s new fatwa banning foreign militants has been hailed by officials in Kabul as a decisive theological shift. But rising attacks in the north, continued TTP operations, and mounting pressure from Washington expose a widening gap between doctrine and reality. As regional powers demand proof of enforcement, the decree risks becoming another symbolic gesture unless it translates into measurable action on the ground.

Read More »
Deconstructing the Pakistan-Afghanistan Economic Crisis

Deconstructing the Pakistan-Afghanistan Economic Crisis

The Pakistan-Afghanistan trade freeze is widely framed as a punitive economic move, yet its roots lie in a severe security breakdown emanating from Afghan territory. Pakistan’s transit closures are reactive, not aggressive, and Afghanistan’s deep logistical dependence on Pakistani routes exposes the crisis as geopolitical, not commercial.

Read More »
Criminalising Dissent: How New Laws and “Public Order” Politics Are Shrinking Democratic Space in India

Criminalising Dissent: How New Laws and “Public Order” Politics Are Shrinking Democratic Space in India

India is witnessing a steady erosion of democratic freedoms as broad security laws, digital surveillance, and administrative restrictions redefine dissent as a threat rather than a constitutional right. From expanded use of UAPA and IT Rules to routine protest crackdowns and shrinking academic space, the cumulative impact is a quieter and increasingly constrained civic sphere.

Read More »