India Warns Afghanistan From Joining CPEC | A Threat to Afghan Economic Potential

India Warns Afghanistan From Joining CPEC | A Threat to Afghan Economic Potential

Afghanistan, a landlocked country, is dependent on other countries for its trade. Despite being a central point that connects South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East, Afghan economic potential is hindered due to limited opportunities. Pakistan and China have extended their support by offering the extension of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) to Afghanistan. The inclusion of Afghanistan in this multi-billion dollar project can make it the central point of Asian trade. However, the Indian Ministry of External Affairs has released an official statement that warns of serious repercussions for any third country that desires to join CPEC. Despite being a promoter of Afghan stability, the questions are rising about India hindering Afghan economic potential.

Also See: Afghanistan: The Four-Pronged Saga

Source: Afintl

WebDesk

WebDesk

Recent

Iran war is exposing world order that is shifting away from US economic dominance

The Islamabad Bridge: Navigating the Ruins of a Unipolar Order

The 2026 US-Iran conflict serves as a “Suez Moment” for American hegemony, exposing the terminal decline of the post-1945 rules-based order. As US security guarantees fracture, global allies are shifting toward “major hedging” and regional autonomy to protect their own energy and economic interests. In this vacuum, Pakistan has transitioned from a frontline state to a pivotal mediator, leveraging the Islamabad Talks to define a new era of transactional multipolarity. This shift prioritizes terrestrial connectivity and local stabilization over the unilateral dictates of a distant hegemon.

Read More »
The flag of the International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA waves in front of the IAEA

The Mirage of “Nuclear Islamism”: Why the Pakistan-Iran Comparison Fails

This commentary critiques Brahma Chellaney’s “nuclear Islamism” narrative, arguing that grouping Pakistan and Iran ignores critical legal and strategic realities. It highlights the disparity in non-proliferation enforcement, specifically contrasting the treatment of NPT signatories with the strategic exceptions granted to India. By deconstructing ideological framing, the text advocates for a foreign policy analysis rooted in treaty architecture rather than religious identity.

Read More »