China’s Wang Yi Visits Russia

China's Wang Yi Visits Russia

China’s top diplomat travels to Russia amid US-Ukraine tensions and deepening partnership between China and Russia.

As US President Joe Biden touched down in Ukraine to meet with his counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday, China’s top diplomat, Wang Yi visits Russia.

Wang Yi, who was promoted to Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s top foreign policy adviser last month, is due to arrive in Moscow this week. His visit is the final stop of his eight-day Europe tour. The trip highlights China’s attempted diplomatic balancing act since Russia’s tanks rolled into Ukraine a year ago.

The Kremlin has said it does not “rule out” a meeting between Wang and Russian leader Vladimir Putin. If they do meet, the images of Wang and Putin shaking hands inside the fortified Kremlin will stand in stark contrast to Biden’s open-air stroll with Zelensky through Kyiv. This contrast will be highlighted amid air raid sirens.

The optics of the two trips, taking place just days before the one-year anniversary of the brutal war on Friday, underscore the sharpening of geopolitical fault lines. This contrast is evident as Wang Yi visits Russia.

China-US Contentions

Relations between the US and China continue to plummet, most recently due to the fallout from a suspected Chinese spy balloon that entered US airspace. Meanwhile, China and Russia are as close as ever since their leaders declared a “no-limits” friendship a year ago. This closeness is partly driven by their shared animosity toward the United States.

As the US and its allies reaffirm their support for Ukraine and step up military aid, Beijing’s deepening partnership with Moscow has raised alarms in Western capitals. This concern persists despite China’s public charm offensive in Europe, where it presents itself as a negotiator of peace, as Wang Yi Visits Russia.

At the Munich Security Conference on Saturday, Wang addressed a room of European officials as “dear friends.” He touted China’s commitment to peace while apparently attempting to drive a wedge between Europe and the US.

“We do not add fuel to the fire, and we’re against reaping benefits from this crisis,” Wang said. This statement was a thinly veiled dig at the US. It echoed the propaganda messaging regularly featured on China’s nightly prime-time news program. This messaging claims that the US is intentionally prolonging the war. It suggests that the US is doing so to advance its own geopolitical interests and increase the profits of its arms manufacturers.

Chinese digs towards US

“Some forces might not want to see peace talks to materialize. They don’t care about the life and death of Ukrainians, nor the harm on Europe. They might have strategic goals larger than Ukraine itself. This warfare must not continue,” Wang said.

He urged European officials to think about “what framework should there be to bring lasting peace to Europe, what role should Europe play to manifest its strategic autonomy.”

Wang also announced Beijing’s plan to release its proposition on a “political settlement of the Ukraine crisis” around the first anniversary.

The vague mention of the proposal was met with suspicion from some Western leaders. They are closely watching for any support China might lend to its northern neighbor. This includes any assistance that could help Russia on the battlefield.

“We need more proof that China isn’t working with Russia, and we aren’t seeing that now,” European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen told CNN Saturday.

Such suspicions are compounded by claims from US officials. They say Beijing is considering stepping up its partnership with Moscow. This includes supplying Russia’s military with “lethal support.”

“We’ve been watching this very closely,” US Secretary of State Antony Blinken told “Face the Nation” on CBS in Munich on Sunday.

“The concern that we have now is based on information we have that they’re considering providing lethal support, and we’ve made very clear to them that that would cause a serious problem for us and in our relationship,” Blinken said.

China blaming US

Responding to the accusations Monday, China’s Foreign Ministry blasted the US for “shoving responsibility, shifting blame and spreading false information.”

“It is the US side, not the Chinese side, that supplies a steady stream of weapons to the battlefield. The US side is not qualified to lecture China, and we would never accept the US dictating or even coercing pressure on Sino-Russian relations,” a ministry spokesperson said at a regular news conference.

“Who is calling for dialogue and peace? And who is handing out knives and encouraging confrontation? The international community can see clearly,” the spokesperson said.

US officials have been concerned enough with the intelligence that they shared it with allies and partners in Munich, according to CNN reporting. In a meeting with Wang on the sidelines of the conference on Saturday, Blinken also raised the issue. He warned Wang about its “implications and consequences,” according to a US readout.

SEE ALSO: https://southasiatimes.org/us-warns-china-on-arming-russia-for-ukraine-war/

Chinese Concerns

If true, the US accusations would mark a major escalation in China’s support for Russia. This would usher in a dangerous and unpredictable new phase in the war itself.

Previously, Beijing had carefully avoided actions that could trigger secondary sanctions. Such sanctions would deal a devastating blow to an economy already hampered by three years of a costly zero-Covid policy.

Though China claimed impartiality in the conflict and no advance knowledge of Russia’s intent, it has refused to condemn Moscow. China has also parroted Kremlin lines that blame NATO for provoking the conflict.

And while Beijing’s pro-Russian rhetoric appears to have softened in recent months, its support for Moscow – when measured by its annual trade, diplomatic engagements and schedule of joint military exercises – has bolstered over the past year.

Chinese officials have often calibrated their narrative to different audiences. Wang may have made many appealing pledges during his Europe tour, but whether they will be translated into a consistent message to be delivered to Putin when the two meet is another question.

Source: CNN

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »
The Afghan Crucible

The Afghan Crucible

Recent reporting underscores Afghanistan’s transformation into a strategic hub for transnational jihadist networks. Far from being a localized security problem, the Afghan landscape now functions as an ideological, logistical, and digital anchor linking extremist affiliates across Africa, Southeast Asia, and beyond, signaling the collapse of regional containment and the rise of a globalized threat architecture.

Read More »
Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Strategic competition has moved beyond decisive wars toward a subtler synthesis of economic leverage, proxy networks, and calibrated force. Infrastructure, finance, and trade routes now function as instruments of power, quietly reshaping regional orders while preserving the façade of restraint. In this environment, security is no longer confined to the battlefield but embedded in supply chains, data networks, and development choices, forcing states to rethink deterrence, sovereignty, and resilience.

Read More »
The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

As scrutiny mounts over the Taliban’s tolerance of TTP sanctuaries, Kabul has attempted to deflect blame by alleging that ISIS-K operates from Pakistan. This false equivalence ignores the historical origins of ISIS-K in eastern Afghanistan, its sustained campaign of violence against Pakistan, and verified intelligence showing that the group’s operational depth remains rooted inside Afghan territory.

Read More »