TTP: “Let’s Disturb China”

TTP, IEA and China

 

“Let’s disturb China;” These are the words of Mufti Abu Zar al-Burmi, teacher of Qari Hussain Ahmad Mehsud (cousin of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan leader Hakimullah Mehsud, who spearheaded the TTP’s suicide bombing squad). As it happens, China is not immune from Islamic Jihad and has been working for decades to iron out religious-led strategic threats from its territory and overseas interests. East Turkmenistan Islamic Movement (ETIM) and Turkistan Islamic Party (TIP) were initially the major security challenges, and now Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), in collaboration with ETIM, ISKP, and BLA, is as dangerous to Chinese interests as the former organizations.

TTP security threats have increased for China and Pakistan since the Taliban swept into power in Afghanistan and TTP found safe havens there.

Afghanistan: The Chinese Interests

The primary interest of China in Afghanistan hinges on eliminating the security challenges coming from the ETIM, which is working to liberate the Xinjiang province of China. Strategically, Xinjiang has significance for China; it shares borders with eight neighboring states and is an important province since China produces wind and solar energy totaling 137.8 billion kWh. It considerably aids China’s shift to green and low-carbon energy and is equivalent to burning 41 million tonnes of conventional coal, which reduces carbon dioxide emissions by 110 million tons.

On the other hand, China should be aware that the TTP is not a strategic threat to Pakistan but to China. Historically, the banned organization has spread persistent anti-China propaganda through different platforms. For example, from 2013 to 2014, the entity’s English-language Azan Magazine criticized Pakistan for maintaining friendly relations with China, an “atheist” and infidel state. Additionally, after the Tiananmen Square attack, Abdullah Mansoor of TTP said, “O Chinese unbelievers, know that you have been fooling East Turkestan for the last sixty years, but now they have awakened.”

Fast forward to 2022, when the TTP ambushed Chinese officials living at the Serena hotel in Quetta with suicide vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices (SVBIEDs). The target had been China’s ambassador to Pakistan. Moreover, TTP provided logistical and operational support to ETIM to attack Chinese engineers working at Dasu Dam, KP, Pakistan. In this deadly attack, nine Chinese and four Pakistanis were killed.

The TTP-ETIM Nexus

Notably, the TTP-ETIM nexus is not a maiden development. The ETIM, formally created in 1997, is a separatist movement that seeks to free Xinjiang from what it views as China’s colonial control, working to create the autonomous state of East Turkestan.

In April 2013, Islami Awazi, the ETIM propaganda mouthpiece, surfaced a video on social media in which young boys were getting training in North Waziristan under the shadow of the TTP. Further, ETIM has received support from TTP through hideouts, equipment, and training. Previously, the TTP’s leader in North Waziristan, Hafiz Gul Bahadur, had permitted the Uyghur militants to operate there. Once TTP observed the ideological appeal of ETIM, they kidnapped the Chinese tourist Hong Xu Dong from Dera Ismail Khan on May 19. Afterward, a Chinese tourist and her interpreter were killed in Peshawar in 2012, and the TTP claimed responsibility, claiming it was in reprisal for the “atrocities” carried out by Chinese security forces in Xinjiang.

Along with ETIM, TTP is the mother organization that provided the initial leaders and members for the Islamic State of Khorasan (ISKP). The same ISKP killed two Chinese teachers in Balochistan in 2017. In Afghanistan, ISKP has launched a wave of attacks and propaganda against China. On December 12, 2022, Chinese citizens were targeted by ISKP in Kabul. On the propaganda front, ISKP published an article, “China’s Daydream of Imperialism,” in its “Voice of Khorasan” magazine.

The TTP, however, did not stop there and moved to shake hands with the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) on operational levels.

Ethno-nationalist terrorist groups in Balochistan receive military instruction from the TTP. In return, the TTP enjoys logistical support from them. The BLA is notorious for its anti-China propaganda and attacks on Chinese workers working in Balochistan.

A Threat Matrix for China

Unfortunately, this startlingly obvious TTP threat matrix for China is a less popular topic in Chinese and Pakistani security circles. TTP, due to its historical and current engagements with regional terrorist organizations, is one of the major security conundrums for China. TTP is unsustainable from a strategic standpoint until the Afghan Taliban withdraws their support for it under the guise of ethno-cum religious responsibility. As a result, China, like Pakistan, must remind the Taliban to follow the terms of the Doha Agreement and detach itself from terrorist organizations like the TTP.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own. They do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.

Deedar Karim

Deedar Karim, Research Fellow in counter-terrorism, BA & MPhil in International Relations, focused on regional security dynamics. He can be reached on X, formerly Twitter, via @Emperisist

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »