5th April 1956 – Bandaranaike: 4th Prime Minister of Ceylon

In 1956, Bandaranaike won Ceylon’s General Elections and went on to become its 4th Prime Minister. He ruled Ceylon from 1956 to 1959. In 1936, he served as Minister of Local administration in the Second Board of Ministers. In 1947, he served as a Minister in Federal Cabinet.

Bandaranaike was the founder of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party which was a nationalist left-wing party. He formed this party in 1951. To run for election in 1956, Bandaranaike mortgaged his house at Rosmead Place to the Bank of Ceylon for Rs 200,000. He formed Mahajana Eksath Peramuna by assembling a group of small Marxist to contest the 1956 general elections. It was a four-party coalition with a no-contest pact with the Lanka Sama Samaja Party and the Communist Party of Sri Lanka.

Bandaranaike’s policy perspective

Moreover, Bandaranaike’s policies had a very Nationalistic perspective. He aimed at removing the marks the British had left resultantly allowing him to unite Ceylon. His policies include the removal of English as the national language and the elimination of the caste-based system.

During the year 1958, he abolished capital punishments. Although during the same year, he failed to address the 1958 riots, leading to the death of hundreds of Tamils, in Ceylon. This made him pass Tamil Laws so the effect of the ‘Sinhala Only Law’, which made Sinhalese the official language of Ceylon, must not be a tool to be used against minorities in Ceylon.

His foreign policy approach was planned to be neutral but he went on to expel RAF (Royal Air Force) Bases’ Personnel from the country and established relations with the United Soviet Socialist Republic and the People’s Republic of China. He pushed for socialist and non-western policies, which explains much about his foreign policy.

In terms of economic policies, Ceylon was already facing a crisis. Bandaranaike amended labour laws and increased wages. He established Employee Provident Funds and nationalized Ceylon’s bus services to form Ceylon Transport Board. Additionally, he also passed laws to protect peasant farmers.

In 1959, political turmoil started when two leftist ministers of Mahajana Eksath Peramuna (MEP; People’s United Front) resigned, albeit did not affect the MEP coalition. Things worsened when the Colombo Harbor trade union went on strike over the financial crisis. As a consequence to which Bandaranaike dismissed Inspector General Police Silva, who refused to take action.

Bandaranaike’s assassination

Tragically, on 26th September 1959, Talduwe Somarama assassinated Bandaranaike. Somarama was a Buddhist monk residing in Bandaranaike’s residency. He died even after six hours of surgery. Talduwe alongside two other conspirators were tried and were sentenced to death by hanging.

This brought an end to Bandaranaike’s four years of ruling to a tragic end. Bandaranaike is a well-known figure in Sri Lanka and despite controversies for initiating racial crisis, he has been honored. Subsequently, in 1970 Sri Lanka named its first international airport after him.

Abdullah Kayani

Muhammad Abdullah Kayani is a budding scholar with a keen interest in current affairs and news reporting. With a passion for uncovering and analyzing events shaping our world, he aims to inform and engage audiences through insightful commentary and diligent reporting.

Abdullah Kayani

Recent

Pakistan confronts a new security dilemma as the Afghan Taliban provides sanctuary to the TTP while building diplomatic ties with its adversary, India.

The Instrumentality of Asymmetry: Taliban Hedging and Pakistan’s Compounded Security Dilemma

SAT Editorial Desk October 11, 2025

The security architecture of South and Central Asia is undergoing a significant realignment, the implications of which are crystallizing along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. To view the Afghan Taliban’s engagement with India and the TTP’s escalation of attacks as disconnected is to miss the emergence of a complex geopolitical dynamic. This signals a fundamental recalibration of regional relationships, forcing Pakistan to confront a renewed and more intricate security dilemma.

$Explore how Britain's "divide and rule" policy deliberately fractured India, turning communities into rivals and making the tragic 1947 Partition inevitable.$

Ghosts of Divide and Rule Still Haunt South Asia

Rai Muhammad Ahmad October 11, 2025

The British did not just govern India; they divided it. For nearly two centuries, the deliberate policy of “divide and rule” reshaped the subcontinent’s diverse communities into rival camps. By the time the British left in 1947, the wounds of division ran so deep that Partition was not just likely but inevitable, leaving a tragic legacy that continues to haunt South Asia today.

TTP’s resurgence under the Afghan Taliban threatens not just Pakistan but global stability, linking jihadist networks across South and Central Asia.

Terrorism Beyond Borders: Why the TTP Threat Is Not Pakistan’s Alone

Faiqa Khanam October 11, 2025

The resurgence of Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) under the Taliban’s ideological protection is reactivating global terror networks across South and Central Asia. This op-ed explores how the TTP’s links with al-Qaeda, ISKP, and TIP make it a transnational threat, one that endangers U.S., Chinese, and regional interests alike, not just Pakistan’s stability.

From The Periphery to the Center: What People at Our Margins Endure

SAT Web Administrator October 10, 2025

The South Asia Times (SAT) hosted a national webinar titled “From the Periphery to the Center: What People at Our Margins Endure,” spotlighting how Pakistan’s border regions, Balochistan, Gilgit-Baltistan, Azad Jammu & Kashmir, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, face deep-rooted governance challenges, economic neglect, and communication voids. Experts called for shifting from a security-centric to an inclusion-driven policy model to rebuild trust, empower youth, and turn Pakistan’s peripheries into engines of national resilience.

The Indian Muslim: Living Between Faith and Fear

SAT Research October 9, 2025

In September 2025, a simple expression of faith became a crime. When a devotional social media trend, the ‘I Love Muhammad’ campaign, went viral, it was deliberately framed as a provocation by authorities. The state’s response was swift and brutal: mass arrests and punitive demolitions that turned a peaceful act of devotion into a national flashpoint, revealing a clear intent to police and punish Muslim identity itself.