The Question of Illegal Afghan Immigrants

Pakistan’s decision to send back illegal Afghan Immigrants back to their country only reflects the country’s own economic and security crisis.

If we speak numbers, Pakistan’s this month’s ultimatum to illegal Afghan immigrants residing in the country will affect 1.73 million people, to be exact. For humanitarians across the spectrum, the announcement is inhumane, and Pakistan should adopt a softer approach towards the illegal immigrants. But the hue and cry of unjust treatment misses out the larger context that has pushed such a decision.

Deteriorating security situation and a rising graph of violent extremist attacks edged to a point where such a step was considered as the right course of action.

But there are certain complications as per micromanaging the policy. First up, the intention behind the policy must be very clear. Does the government seek to adopt and implement this measure as a long-term consistent policy or it has surfaced only as a reaction to very unfortunate suicide attacks such as the most recent one in Mastung, Balochistan?

If it’s a policy in reaction, does the government only seek to coerce and earn leverage in convincing the Interim Government of Afghanistan to hunt down and capture Tehrik e Taliban Pakistan’s (TTP) militants inside Afghanistan? The incursion of TTP in Chitral, coming from Afghanistan’s side of the border, just the last month, is a case in point here.

Also Read: Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan: No Trouble with Neighbors

As for why the Afghans inside Pakistan must bear the brunt, Caretaker Interior Minister, Sarfaraz Bugti, shared information with media that reveals involvement of 14 Afghan nationals in carrying out suicide attacks in the country, since January.

For a country living through an almost economic crisis, a bad security canvas can be too costly to bear at this point.

The decision to send back Afghans with no valid documents for stay is an attempt to ease off some burden. It should be very clear that the decision does not apply to Afghans who have lived in the country for decades now and are contributing in a healthy way to the economy. They are certainly a social and economic capital for Pakistan.

For an ideal scenario of peace to prevail in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations, reciprocated cooperation is a pre-condition. Pakistan helped Afghanistan earn a major revenue in coal exports by becoming its top export destination soon after Kabul’s takeover had left Afghanistan in a tough economic situation. But a trade that could potentially go a long way was disrupted by Afghanistan when it increased the price and added additional taxes.

Pakistan’s major import companies, then, turned to other sellers. Likewise, collecting additional taxes on Pakistan’s transit trade to Central Asia that passes through Afghanistan is another instance where Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (IEA) deems its gains superior over mutual gains. Smuggling of dollars via Afghanistan keeps giving Pakistan the setback of currency devaluation. Such matters steal away the room for cooperation that is being pushed by one country but not reciprocated by the other.

Pakistan, with a plethora of its own issues, cannot fully foresee the process of registering massive influx of immigrants.

In the absence of support from countries where the Afghan immigrants wish to move after temporary stay in Pakistan, it is catastrophic for the latter to keep hosting them indefinitely. The only feasible way is to deport the illegal immigrants back to their country. Accepting a passport and visa as the only valid travel document from Afghanistan to Pakistan signals that the policy is here to stay. Pakistan, however, must generate acceptance for this policy by sharing its rationale with the world.

SAT Editorial Desk

Your go-to editorial hub for policy perspectives and informed analysis on pressing regional and global issues.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »