Is India’s Democracy Slipping Towards Fascism?

Erosion of India's democracy: Mohandas K. Gandhi, India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Hindu extremist Nathuram Godse, who assassinated Gandhi. [Washington Post illustration; AP]

“If the meanest man in the republic is deprived of his rights then every man in the republic is deprived of his rights.”
—Jane Addams.

A system of contradictions and difficulties beset by India, the most populous democracy globally, threatens to undermine its very foundation. Amid the prevailing political instability and social unrest, domestic and as well as international stakeholders are expressing apprehensions regarding the gradual erosion of India’s democracy, the democratic principles, and the rise of Hindutva fascism under the Modi regime, as the country gears up for elections.

A prominent Hindutva ideologue, Sadashivrao Golwalkar, praised Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany for killing a lot of Jews to protect their culture and racial purity. People of non-Hindu descent in Hindustan should give up their separate identities and become fully integrated into Hindu culture, – this was something he strongly believed. Besides that, he refused to give these people any rights, even citizenship.

The Modi administration’s use of the Hindutva idea as a strategy has led to talk about how Indian Muslims are treated like they are less than human. Even though it has gotten a lot of bad press, the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) of 2019 goes against the political foundations of the country and weakens the idea of citizenship among Muslims.

In 2022, Narendra Modi, then Chief Minister of Gujarat, unleashed riots that left more than 1,000 people dead. Almost all the casualties were Muslims. The deadly violence has been dubbed the “Muslim pogroms” and Modi the “Butcher of Gujarat” and BBC in its documentary also endorsed that Modi was directly responsible for the massacre of Muslims in Gujrat.

Moreover, the recent tragic but unsurprising events as the inauguration of the Ram Mandir (Temple) with glory and satisfaction, depict a symbolic transformation towards a storyline of epic marginalization, where the core principles of India such as inclusiveness and democracy are overlooked completely under the Modi administration.

As far as the CAA is concerned, a statement made on it effectively captures the fundamental intention behind it, which is the de-legitimization of Muslim citizens. This reflects the widespread sense of marginalization and discrimination faced by minorities.

Also Read: Lok Sabha Elections in India: Complexities and Challenges

Even so, the account of New Delhi’s transition toward Hindutva fascism goes beyond the political realm, examining the deeply rooted cultural mindset characterized by the ongoing religious polarization. The glorification of Nathuram Godse, the murderer of Gandhi, is a notable transition towards a narrative centered on violence, and animosity, which stands in stark contrast to Gandhi’s aspiration for a secular and inclusive India. On the other hand, the normalization of hate speech and the idolization and worship of radical figures highlight a worrying trend in which dissent is suppressed and minorities, especially Muslims, are radically marginalized through state apparatuses.

Apart from all these anti-democratic traits, India is also facing pertinent challenges. A study conducted by the World Inequality Lab reveals that Delhi is already struggling with the existing issue of increasing socio-economic inequalities, and these inequalities can impact the national integration of India, which can worsen the existing divisions. Furthermore, the report highlights how the wealth gap in Modi’s India is growing, where the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer.

India’s complicated efforts to hide illicit acts were exposed by The Guardian in its ongoing probe into illegal acts of extra-judicial killings in other countries. This makes the situation at home, and abroad in countries such as Pakistan, and Canada, more complicated. The violence that features homicides, which is expressly prohibited in India, to some extent is what negatively portrays India’s image at a global level. These developments will only further deteriorate the fragile political climate in the country.

US charges Nikhil Gupta, 52, alleging his involvement in a murder-for-hire plot directed by an Indian government official against a Sikh activist [Al Jazeera].

Also Read: India’s Dream Run Hits a Speed Bump?

Beyond the challenges posed by the complexity of these issues lies the most basic question of what India is and where it is heading.

In the case of India, there is an ongoing debate as to whether traditional diversity can be reconciled with contemporary Indian nationalism. Is it possible or not to survive in a society with fractured freedom and equality under a growing oppressive regime?

Lastly, India has nuclear assets governed by ultra-nationalist leaders such as Modi, who has an expansionist agenda based on the Hindutva ideology and the dream of Great India is bound to give further doubts and perhaps in the future, it might pose a threat to the states of South Asia.

On this trip from a full-fledged democracy to the one with flaws, there are several hurdles. However, Indian people must not forget their right to vote and to use their reasoned judgment in elections, and thereby make decisions according to the integrity and unity of the nation rather than Hindu nationalism, which could let the rift between different people emerge. The survival of democracy and equality requires a choice between preserving religious, and ethnic diversity, and rejecting the forces that cause disharmony.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own. They do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.

Mehmood Ali

Mehmood Ali

Mehmood Ali, a research assistant at Balochistan Think Tank Network, is an award-winning young researcher specializing in South Asian Security Threat Matrix and Socioeconomic development. With a background in Security studies, he's well-versed in Militancy and Terrorism protocols. Ali previously served as a Research Fellow at South Asia Times and as a Research Intern at India Study Centre (ISSI). He can be contacted at X or @MEHMOODBALOCH75.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »