The Madhya Pradesh High Court’s recent verdict declaring the Kamal Maula mosque in Dhar’s Bhojshala complex as a Hindu temple is not an isolated judicial decision. It represents the latest chapter in the BJP-led Hindutva project that systematically targets Muslim religious sites to consolidate Hindu majoritarian support.
This pattern began prominently with the 1992 demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya by Hindu nationalist mobs, an event that triggered widespread riots killing thousands, mostly Muslims. The 2019 Supreme Court verdict allowing a Ram Temple on the site, followed by its grand inauguration by Modi in 2024, opened the floodgates. Similar disputes now rage over the Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi and the Shahi Eidgah in Mathura. In each case, claims of temples beneath mosques backed by selective ASI surveys, have favored Hindu petitioners while sidelining the Places of Worship Act 1991, which aimed to freeze the religious character of sites as they existed in 1947.
The BJP frequently amplifies communal narratives before polls. High-profile terror incidents such as the 2001 Parliament attack, the 2019 Pulwama suicide bombing blamed on Pakistan-backed groups and more recent attacks like the one in Phalgam have often coincided with election cycles. These events are swiftly leveraged to stoke anti-Pakistan and anti-Muslim sentiment, painting the community as disloyal and justifying a hardline Hindutva stance. Such polarization has repeatedly translated into electoral dividends for the BJP by rallying Hindu voters under the banner of nationalism and cultural reclamation.
While Hindu groups celebrate the “restoration” of a supposed Saraswati temple, local Muslims like the long-serving muezzin see it as erasure of their lived heritage and generational worship. The court’s reliance on ASI findings and dismissal of British-era records as insufficient has raised questions about institutional neutrality. Historians and opposition voices, including Asaduddin Owaisi, warn of a domino effect that could endanger countless other Muslim shrines, including extreme claims on icons like the Taj Mahal.
This instrumentalization of history and security threats fosters deep Islamophobia. Muslims face not only physical and legal marginalization but also a shrinking public space for their faith and identity. As appeals head to higher courts, India must confront whether it wishes to be defined by inclusive pluralism or divisive Hindutva majoritarianism.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
The international community has now gotten into a perilous stand-off over Afghanistan. The international community has been working for almost five years under the false
There are moments in political life when a demand presented as democratic reform is, upon careful examination, precisely its opposite. The Joint Awami Action Committee’s
There is a particular kind of political deception that is especially dangerous, not the overt kind that announces its intentions, but the kind that wraps
Hindutva’s Temple March: BJP’s Systematic Erosion of Muslim Sacred Sites for Electoral Gains
The Madhya Pradesh High Court’s recent verdict declaring the Kamal Maula mosque in Dhar’s Bhojshala complex as a Hindu temple is not an isolated judicial decision. It represents the latest chapter in the BJP-led Hindutva project that systematically targets Muslim religious sites to consolidate Hindu majoritarian support.
This pattern began prominently with the 1992 demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya by Hindu nationalist mobs, an event that triggered widespread riots killing thousands, mostly Muslims. The 2019 Supreme Court verdict allowing a Ram Temple on the site, followed by its grand inauguration by Modi in 2024, opened the floodgates. Similar disputes now rage over the Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi and the Shahi Eidgah in Mathura. In each case, claims of temples beneath mosques backed by selective ASI surveys, have favored Hindu petitioners while sidelining the Places of Worship Act 1991, which aimed to freeze the religious character of sites as they existed in 1947.
The BJP frequently amplifies communal narratives before polls. High-profile terror incidents such as the 2001 Parliament attack, the 2019 Pulwama suicide bombing blamed on Pakistan-backed groups and more recent attacks like the one in Phalgam have often coincided with election cycles. These events are swiftly leveraged to stoke anti-Pakistan and anti-Muslim sentiment, painting the community as disloyal and justifying a hardline Hindutva stance. Such polarization has repeatedly translated into electoral dividends for the BJP by rallying Hindu voters under the banner of nationalism and cultural reclamation.
While Hindu groups celebrate the “restoration” of a supposed Saraswati temple, local Muslims like the long-serving muezzin see it as erasure of their lived heritage and generational worship. The court’s reliance on ASI findings and dismissal of British-era records as insufficient has raised questions about institutional neutrality. Historians and opposition voices, including Asaduddin Owaisi, warn of a domino effect that could endanger countless other Muslim shrines, including extreme claims on icons like the Taj Mahal.
This instrumentalization of history and security threats fosters deep Islamophobia. Muslims face not only physical and legal marginalization but also a shrinking public space for their faith and identity. As appeals head to higher courts, India must confront whether it wishes to be defined by inclusive pluralism or divisive Hindutva majoritarianism.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
Recent
Gender apartheid has an address. It is Kandahar
The international community has now gotten into a perilous stand-off over Afghanistan. The international community has been working for almost five years under the false
Kashmiri Refugees’ Constitutional Rights Are Not a Bargaining Chip for Populist Agitation
There are moments in political life when a demand presented as democratic reform is, upon careful examination, precisely its opposite. The Joint Awami Action Committee’s
How Pakistan Talked Washington and Tehran Off the Brink
For most of this spring, the Strait of Hormuz was less a shipping lane than a held breath. Tankers idled off Bandar Abbas, insurers quietly
Banned JAAC’s Audio Leak Exposes the Violence Behind the Veil of Peaceful Protest
There is a particular kind of political deception that is especially dangerous, not the overt kind that announces its intentions, but the kind that wraps
Herat Residents Return to Streets Demanding Women’s Rights as Taliban Deploys Tanks and Armed Forces to Suppress Civilian Protesters
There is a moment in the life of every authoritarian system when the architecture of repression begins to reveal not the strength of the regime