The Madhya Pradesh High Court’s recent verdict declaring the Kamal Maula mosque in Dhar’s Bhojshala complex as a Hindu temple is not an isolated judicial decision. It represents the latest chapter in the BJP-led Hindutva project that systematically targets Muslim religious sites to consolidate Hindu majoritarian support.
This pattern began prominently with the 1992 demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya by Hindu nationalist mobs, an event that triggered widespread riots killing thousands, mostly Muslims. The 2019 Supreme Court verdict allowing a Ram Temple on the site, followed by its grand inauguration by Modi in 2024, opened the floodgates. Similar disputes now rage over the Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi and the Shahi Eidgah in Mathura. In each case, claims of temples beneath mosques backed by selective ASI surveys, have favored Hindu petitioners while sidelining the Places of Worship Act 1991, which aimed to freeze the religious character of sites as they existed in 1947.
The BJP frequently amplifies communal narratives before polls. High-profile terror incidents such as the 2001 Parliament attack, the 2019 Pulwama suicide bombing blamed on Pakistan-backed groups and more recent attacks like the one in Phalgam have often coincided with election cycles. These events are swiftly leveraged to stoke anti-Pakistan and anti-Muslim sentiment, painting the community as disloyal and justifying a hardline Hindutva stance. Such polarization has repeatedly translated into electoral dividends for the BJP by rallying Hindu voters under the banner of nationalism and cultural reclamation.
While Hindu groups celebrate the “restoration” of a supposed Saraswati temple, local Muslims like the long-serving muezzin see it as erasure of their lived heritage and generational worship. The court’s reliance on ASI findings and dismissal of British-era records as insufficient has raised questions about institutional neutrality. Historians and opposition voices, including Asaduddin Owaisi, warn of a domino effect that could endanger countless other Muslim shrines, including extreme claims on icons like the Taj Mahal.
This instrumentalization of history and security threats fosters deep Islamophobia. Muslims face not only physical and legal marginalization but also a shrinking public space for their faith and identity. As appeals head to higher courts, India must confront whether it wishes to be defined by inclusive pluralism or divisive Hindutva majoritarianism.
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
The United States Department of Labor’s decision on October 8 to suspend permanent residence verification processing for eight major technology companies, including Indian IT giants
“Foreign indentured servants.” Vice President JD Vance chose those words carefully on October 8, and they will outlast the policy they were meant to defend.
Contemporary security statecraft requires dismantling the ideological underpinnings of non-state violent extremism alongside kinetic counter-terrorism operations. Ground-breaking scholarly research, most notably Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri’s comprehensive study
Originally published by Atalyar. Featured by South Asia Times (SAT) for informational purposes, with attribution to the original author and publisher. The immediate disagreement was
India once accused the Taliban of bombing its embassy in Kabul. Today its embassy is back, and Pakistani intelligence reports describe a RAW–GDI alliance bringing the TTP and BLA together against Pakistan.
Hindutva’s Temple March: BJP’s Systematic Erosion of Muslim Sacred Sites for Electoral Gains
The Madhya Pradesh High Court’s recent verdict declaring the Kamal Maula mosque in Dhar’s Bhojshala complex as a Hindu temple is not an isolated judicial decision. It represents the latest chapter in the BJP-led Hindutva project that systematically targets Muslim religious sites to consolidate Hindu majoritarian support.
This pattern began prominently with the 1992 demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya by Hindu nationalist mobs, an event that triggered widespread riots killing thousands, mostly Muslims. The 2019 Supreme Court verdict allowing a Ram Temple on the site, followed by its grand inauguration by Modi in 2024, opened the floodgates. Similar disputes now rage over the Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi and the Shahi Eidgah in Mathura. In each case, claims of temples beneath mosques backed by selective ASI surveys, have favored Hindu petitioners while sidelining the Places of Worship Act 1991, which aimed to freeze the religious character of sites as they existed in 1947.
The BJP frequently amplifies communal narratives before polls. High-profile terror incidents such as the 2001 Parliament attack, the 2019 Pulwama suicide bombing blamed on Pakistan-backed groups and more recent attacks like the one in Phalgam have often coincided with election cycles. These events are swiftly leveraged to stoke anti-Pakistan and anti-Muslim sentiment, painting the community as disloyal and justifying a hardline Hindutva stance. Such polarization has repeatedly translated into electoral dividends for the BJP by rallying Hindu voters under the banner of nationalism and cultural reclamation.
While Hindu groups celebrate the “restoration” of a supposed Saraswati temple, local Muslims like the long-serving muezzin see it as erasure of their lived heritage and generational worship. The court’s reliance on ASI findings and dismissal of British-era records as insufficient has raised questions about institutional neutrality. Historians and opposition voices, including Asaduddin Owaisi, warn of a domino effect that could endanger countless other Muslim shrines, including extreme claims on icons like the Taj Mahal.
This instrumentalization of history and security threats fosters deep Islamophobia. Muslims face not only physical and legal marginalization but also a shrinking public space for their faith and identity. As appeals head to higher courts, India must confront whether it wishes to be defined by inclusive pluralism or divisive Hindutva majoritarianism.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
SAT Commentary
Recent
US Regulatory Action and Crony Oligarchies Expose Indian Structural Fragilities
The United States Department of Labor’s decision on October 8 to suspend permanent residence verification processing for eight major technology companies, including Indian IT giants
Indian Tech Firms Meet the Limits of American Welcome
“Foreign indentured servants.” Vice President JD Vance chose those words carefully on October 8, and they will outlast the policy they were meant to defend.
Ideological Foundations and Strategic Realities of Fitna al-Khawarij
Contemporary security statecraft requires dismantling the ideological underpinnings of non-state violent extremism alongside kinetic counter-terrorism operations. Ground-breaking scholarly research, most notably Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri’s comprehensive study
Russia’s Taliban Gamble Opens a New Terrorism Fault Line
Originally published by Atalyar. Featured by South Asia Times (SAT) for informational purposes, with attribution to the original author and publisher. The immediate disagreement was
India’s Afghanistan Gambit
India once accused the Taliban of bombing its embassy in Kabul. Today its embassy is back, and Pakistani intelligence reports describe a RAW–GDI alliance bringing the TTP and BLA together against Pakistan.