In today’s political chaos, what looks like a protest by PTI is actually something more calculated. Since being voted out in 2022, the party hasn’t just gone into opposition, it seems to have switched gears entirely. Instead of defending itself through facts, PTI is trying to win the battle of perception and that too by compromising national integrity. The strategy is becoming clear every passing day since the ouster: call legal action “persecution,” label arrests as “abductions,” and turn every enforcement step into a media spectacle.
This playbook seems to be built on key tactics: label every arrest as an “abduction,” recast lawful detentions as “kidnappings,” and saturate both domestic and foreign media with the party’s version of events. The aim of all these isn’t to resist injustice, it’s to control the narrative which keep loosing its grounds in a rationally driven world.
In 2023, this strategy became increasingly visible. Shireen Mazari’s legal detention under the Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) ordinance was instantly framed as an “abduction.” When Shehryar Afridi was transferred in the middle of the night, within legal procedure, it was dubbed “kidnapping.” Even the filmed, lawful arrest of Aliya Hamza was rebranded as a “disappearance.” All these terms were not errors in reporting, they were calculated efforts to blur the lines between legal process and political vendetta.
Ironically, this is the same party that once led accountability campaigns. The very institutions the party previously leaned on to prosecute rivals are now painted as tools of repression. Imran Khan, who personally endorsed anti-corruption drives during his premiership, now labels all legal scrutiny, from the Toshakhana case to the Al-Qadir Trust probe, as politically motivated. Yet, the cases themselves didn’t appear overnight. They are based on documented transactions and legal frameworks. What changed is not the evidence, it is the party’s stance when it finds itself in the dock.
Even behind bars, Khan’s voice echoes loudly. Through loyal aides, social media, and international media platforms, he continues to shape public discourse. Letters to The Guardian and carefully crafted messages circulate faster than legal petitions move through courtrooms. Far from being silenced, the party’s messaging has become more disciplined, more emotive, and more globally oriented. This is not censorship; it’s narrative engineering.
Meanwhile, in courtrooms across Pakistan, PTI’s legal strategy tells its own story. The Toshakhana case alone has seen more than ten adjournments. From sudden medical excuses to abrupt lawyer swaps, the party leans on procedural delay, not substantive legal defense. The aim isn’t acquittal through evidence but evidently, it is deferral through attrition because the longer the process drags, the easier it becomes to cry foul and claim persecution. The most unfortunate part of this all is the fact that at the heart of this strategy lies a deeper, more corrosive ambition and that is, to delegitimize institutions. When every arrest is termed fascism and every court order is portrayed as a political conspiracy, public trust in the rule of law erodes. What starts as a media strategy ends as institutional decay. In the aftermath, courts are no longer seen as arbiters of justice but as extensions of political agendas. Law enforcement becomes a villain in every headline. And the public, already skeptical, withdraws further into partisan silos, as evident in every political opinion today.
This is not democratic resistance, it’s narrative warfare. The objective is not justice but disruption. By turning legal scrutiny into victimhood and framing accountability as oppression, PTI is building a political brand on institutional mistrust. Pakistan’s democracy, already fragile, cannot afford such erosion. Institutions must remain above partisan spin and PTI must recognise it. Because the challenge now is not just legal, it is communicative. A state that fails to defend the legitimacy of its institutions risks becoming hostage to those who thrive on their delegitimization.
In the end, what we’re witnessing is not just a party under pressure. It’s a political machine running a tested playbook, one where legal vulnerability is turned into public sympathy, and institutional checks are reframed as political betrayal. The longer this continues unchecked, the more fragile Pakistan’s democratic architecture becomes. And unfortunately, that’s the biggest dilemma of Pakistan’s political culture which PTI is unable to drop.
Engineering Victimhood: Inside PTI’s Post-2022 Media Playbook
In today’s political chaos, what looks like a protest by PTI is actually something more calculated. Since being voted out in 2022, the party hasn’t just gone into opposition, it seems to have switched gears entirely. Instead of defending itself through facts, PTI is trying to win the battle of perception and that too by compromising national integrity. The strategy is becoming clear every passing day since the ouster: call legal action “persecution,” label arrests as “abductions,” and turn every enforcement step into a media spectacle.
This playbook seems to be built on key tactics: label every arrest as an “abduction,” recast lawful detentions as “kidnappings,” and saturate both domestic and foreign media with the party’s version of events. The aim of all these isn’t to resist injustice, it’s to control the narrative which keep loosing its grounds in a rationally driven world.
In 2023, this strategy became increasingly visible. Shireen Mazari’s legal detention under the Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) ordinance was instantly framed as an “abduction.” When Shehryar Afridi was transferred in the middle of the night, within legal procedure, it was dubbed “kidnapping.” Even the filmed, lawful arrest of Aliya Hamza was rebranded as a “disappearance.” All these terms were not errors in reporting, they were calculated efforts to blur the lines between legal process and political vendetta.
Ironically, this is the same party that once led accountability campaigns. The very institutions the party previously leaned on to prosecute rivals are now painted as tools of repression. Imran Khan, who personally endorsed anti-corruption drives during his premiership, now labels all legal scrutiny, from the Toshakhana case to the Al-Qadir Trust probe, as politically motivated. Yet, the cases themselves didn’t appear overnight. They are based on documented transactions and legal frameworks. What changed is not the evidence, it is the party’s stance when it finds itself in the dock.
Even behind bars, Khan’s voice echoes loudly. Through loyal aides, social media, and international media platforms, he continues to shape public discourse. Letters to The Guardian and carefully crafted messages circulate faster than legal petitions move through courtrooms. Far from being silenced, the party’s messaging has become more disciplined, more emotive, and more globally oriented. This is not censorship; it’s narrative engineering.
Meanwhile, in courtrooms across Pakistan, PTI’s legal strategy tells its own story. The Toshakhana case alone has seen more than ten adjournments. From sudden medical excuses to abrupt lawyer swaps, the party leans on procedural delay, not substantive legal defense. The aim isn’t acquittal through evidence but evidently, it is deferral through attrition because the longer the process drags, the easier it becomes to cry foul and claim persecution. The most unfortunate part of this all is the fact that at the heart of this strategy lies a deeper, more corrosive ambition and that is, to delegitimize institutions. When every arrest is termed fascism and every court order is portrayed as a political conspiracy, public trust in the rule of law erodes. What starts as a media strategy ends as institutional decay. In the aftermath, courts are no longer seen as arbiters of justice but as extensions of political agendas. Law enforcement becomes a villain in every headline. And the public, already skeptical, withdraws further into partisan silos, as evident in every political opinion today.
This is not democratic resistance, it’s narrative warfare. The objective is not justice but disruption. By turning legal scrutiny into victimhood and framing accountability as oppression, PTI is building a political brand on institutional mistrust. Pakistan’s democracy, already fragile, cannot afford such erosion. Institutions must remain above partisan spin and PTI must recognise it. Because the challenge now is not just legal, it is communicative. A state that fails to defend the legitimacy of its institutions risks becoming hostage to those who thrive on their delegitimization.
In the end, what we’re witnessing is not just a party under pressure. It’s a political machine running a tested playbook, one where legal vulnerability is turned into public sympathy, and institutional checks are reframed as political betrayal. The longer this continues unchecked, the more fragile Pakistan’s democratic architecture becomes. And unfortunately, that’s the biggest dilemma of Pakistan’s political culture which PTI is unable to drop.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
Recent
Broken Promises, Renewed Threats: Time to Hold TTA Accountable
Five years after the Doha Accord, the Taliban have broken key commitments: 5,000 released prisoners returned to combat, 89% of government posts are held by Pashtuns, and women remain barred from education and work. Afghan soil hosts 6,000–6,500 TTP and Al-Qaeda fighters, with TTP chief Noor Wali Mehsud receiving $43,000/month. Pakistan has neutralized 267 Afghan terrorists in 2025, while 58 terrorist camps operate under Taliban knowledge. Despite the US aid, compliance is minimal. International recognition and support must now be tied to verifiable reforms to prevent further regional instability.
The Istanbul Dialogue: How the Taliban’s Intransigence Doomed Diplomacy
The highly anticipated Istanbul dialogue, facilitated by Turkey and Qatar, has ended in deadlock. The Taliban’s refusal to act against the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and their introduction of provocative counter-demands have effectively derailed the diplomatic process, underscoring the ideological rigidity driving Kabul’s foreign policy.
Centralized Power and the Core–Periphery Divide in Afghanistan
The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan’s return in 2021 brought rapid consolidation of power, but also the revival of a historical flaw. By concentrating authority in the hands of southern Pashtun elites, the Taliban have recreated the core–periphery divide that has destabilized every Afghan regime since the 19th century. This hyper-centralization, rooted in ethnic exclusivity and Kandahar dominance, risks a repeat of past collapses as non-Pashtun regions turn toward functional autonomy.
Broken Promises: The Taliban’s Betrayal of Global Commitments
Nearly three years after seizing power, the Taliban’s systematic violation of their international commitments under the 2020 Doha Accord has transformed Afghanistan into a sanctuary for terrorism, entrenched an autocratic regime, and institutionalized gender apartheid. Beyond moral failure, this deceit poses a grave threat to regional stability, international counterterrorism efforts, and the credibility of global diplomacy. Holding the regime accountable is now a strategic necessity, not a choice.
Do You Remember 6/11/ 1947?: A Forgotten Jammu Genocide and the Continuing Erasure of Kashmiriyat
On November 6, 1947, one of South Asia’s earliest genocides unfolded in Jammu, where hundreds of thousands of Muslims were massacred or forced to flee. Yet, unlike other global tragedies, this atrocity remains buried in silence. The Jammu Genocide not only reshaped the region’s demography but laid the foundation for India’s ongoing campaign of identity erasure in Kashmir. From demographic engineering to cultural censorship, the spirit of Kashmiriyat continues to face systematic annihilation.