Shaheer Ahmed is a research scholar passionate about analyzing diplomatic relations and political dynamics between nations, focusing on their impact on global power structures.

Book Review: Psychological Warfare in Arab Israeli Conflict

‘Psychological warfare in Arab Israeli conflict’ is a scholarly work of Ron Schleifer. He has entailed a deep analysis of psychological warfare in the context of Arab Israeli conflict. Introduction The book examines the Arab and Israeli efforts to gain the sympathies of the world; while, tracing back their struggles from the British mandate of Palestine to the Mavi Marmara affairs in 2010. The author has also highlighted the successes and failures achieved during the conflict. Schleifer characterized psychological warfare as a non-violent and nonmilitary means to achieve military goals. Stating that it has been implied in all lower-intensity conflicts to total war. The rising influence of media has increased the role of psychological warfare in policymaking, both in times of war and peace. Basic Terms in Psychological Warfare Ron Schleifer starts his book with basic terminologies and principles of psychological warfare. The terminologies of propaganda, diplomacy and psychological operations are mainly analyzed through particular connotations; while keeping in view the historical, social and political context i.e. Nazism. Schleifer states that the terminologies involve the social construction of reality; in which, any term can provoke misperceptions and hostility, while the other may evoke an image of tyranny. While discussing the theoretical conceptualizations, Schleifer has discussed the principles of a target audience, message and means of delivery. These three elements attain a significant role in psychological warfare. According to Schleifer, to successfully wage psychological war, political, social identities, perceptions, and communications hold a significant role. Psychological Warfare Against Britain After explaining the theoretical conceptualization, the author also explained the evolution of terminologies in the 20th century. Schleifer chronologically traced the roots of Israeli’s propaganda to manipulate the international opinion against Great Britain’s anti-immigration policies after World War II. It mainly overviews the Yishuv’s psychological war during; the Arab Israeli war in 1948-82, the Israeli Lebanon war during 1985-2000, the First and Second Intifada. Yishuv, David Ben-Gurion, Menachem Begin and Avraham Stern successfully combined the persuasive tactics, military activities; coupled with, the strong knowledge of the British and Arab cultures powerfully impacted the targeted audience. Psychological Warfare During Intifadas Schleifer argues about the themes, justifications, argumentations, and emotional elements which characterized the Intifada. Some themes and argumentations were associated with a particular group. For example, the theme depicting that Israel is violating International Law was prominent among the Palestinians. However, the Israeli commentators also advocated the same theme for the Palestinians. Hence, during \’psychological war\’ there tends to exist the overlapping of some themes. This illustration can be seen in the speeches of Netanyahu and Mehmood Abbas, in which, some common motives and social representations characterized the discourse of the involved groups in the conflict. Planning of Psychological War The author has distinguished between the Palestinian and Israeli way of psychological war after the breakdown of the political process in 1999. Israel main actions included Karine-A in which it involved state of the art intelligence, Aerial activity by deploying gunship helicopters, utilizing the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) during Operation Desert Shield, and exploiting the captured documents. Palestinians mainly utilized the means of dissemination by establishing an independent radio station named Voice of Palestine and Newspapers called \’Al-Hayat Al-Jadida\’ and \’Al-Ayam\’. Moreover, Palestinians used internet sources and symbols to project the centrality of their theme. Furthermore, Palestinians also used other effective ways of psychological techniques by firing on the Jerusalem Gilo’s neighbourhood, suicide bombing, firing Qassam rockets on the Negev and shooting the settler’s vehicles. Mavi-Marmara Affair In the concluding chapter, Schleifer has entailed a mesmerizing case study of the Mavi Marmara affairs. Mavi Marmara affair is a clear illustration of \’information warfare\’, in which, all the elements of psychological operations, network operations and electronic warfare are included. The deployment of informational elements in Mavi Marmara affairs shows the relevance of psychological warfare in the contemporary era. Critical Analysis The book entails a comprehensive analysis of the Arab Israeli conflict and the accounts of psychological warfare. However, the book lacks the theoretical contribution to the existing literature as the argument does not position itself in any theoretical framework. Nonetheless, the book provides valuable comprehension of the decade long Arab Israeli conflict and geopolitical struggles in the Middle East. Despite the theoretical deficiency, the book provides a rich insight for scholars and policymakers interested in Arab Israel conflict. Conclusion Ron Schleifer’s masterpiece states that \’psychological war\’ is a flexible tool for strategic planners to achieve their goals. The weaker sides use psychological war as a force multiplier. This provides greater flexibility in adapting and implementing favourable ideas. Moreover, military-media relations are also a significant element of psychological operations. To pursue goals, both sides in the Arab Israeli conflict employed psychological strategies. Therefore, the book succeeds to entail a deep analysis of the Arab Israeli conflict and conceptualized the art of psychological warfare.

Read More »

Resumption of Military Aid: Reviving US-Pakistan Relations Amid US Withdrawal

Will the resumption of IMET be enough to revive the US-PAK relationship, considering Pakistan\’s growing strategic partnership with China and the building pressure from the Taliban to not allow US Military to operate their bases?.  Resumption of Military Aid Trump’s administration approved to resume the US military training program for Pakistan last year. This coveted US Military and Educational Program recommenced after a suspension of more than a year. The US Principal Secretary for South and Central Asian Affairs Ambassador Alice Well tweeted that the decisions were undertaken by Trump’s administration to strengthen the military-to-military cooperation between the US and Pakistan on a shared basis while prioritizing the US national security. The International Military Education and Training (IMET) program was suspended in 2018 when Pakistan signed an agreement with Russia. The agreement allowed Pakistani military officers to receive training facilities in Russian Military Institutions. Following the same year in May; Washington suspended most of its security aid, delivery of military equipment and transfer of the security-related funds to Pakistan. Washington claimed that Islamabad has provided safe havens to the terrorists in Afghanistan. Pakistan completely denied all such allegations. Experts orated that the decision would undermine the trust and confidence-building measures between Islamabad and Washington. However, the US approved the resumption of the training program and agreed to provide technical support to Pakistan regarding its fleet of F-16 aircraft. These moves underscored the warming relations between the two countries after the meetings between Donald Trump and Imran Khan. The US Request to Allocate Budget for Pakistan The US State Department’s budget request for the year 2021 includes a total of 104 million USD for military training programs. These programs serve as an effective mean to strengthen the military alliances and the international coalitions which are mandatory to the US national security and regional stability. Out of this 104 million USD; the State Department has allocated 12.7 million USD for training the military offices of Central and South Asia. Pakistan’s share comprises 3.5 million USD for the resumption of the training programs. The current IMET program supports the US Indo-Pacific strategy by putting the emphasis on professionalizing the armed forces of the regional partners, promoting professional military education, respect for the rule of law, human rights, and the civilian control of the armed forces. Moreover, the program also includes English language training which will enhance the partner’s abilities to interact with the US. Reviving Relations Evidently, the US is making such efforts to improve the bilateral relationship between Pakistan and itself. The relations of the two countries faced heavy strains after the Abbottabad operation in 2011. The IMET program stands as a pillar of US-Pakistan military relations for more than a decade. Moreover, Washington has credited Islamabad’s role in the Afghan Peace Process. Similarly, the US acknowledges Pakistan\’s efforts in the negotiations on the US troops withdrawal from Afghanistan. The suspension of the military assistance included the cancellation of the 66 slots allocated to Pakistani military officers at National Defense University (NDU) Washington. However, the US military tried to keep these educational programs aloof from the political tensions, arguing that bringing the foreign military officers to the US pay long-term dividends. Pakistan essential role in the Afghan Peace Process has also given birth to speculation about the Pentagon exploring Pakistan as an option for the provision of bases to conduct counterinsurgency operations and preventing Afghanistan from sliding into a civil war following the US withdrawal. However, Pakistan has shown an affirmative stance that it will not provide any bases to the US. The Afghan Taliban have warned the neighbouring countries not to allow the US to operate its bases in their territories. Pakistan has denied the provision of the bases. Nonetheless, Pakistan will cooperate with the US in the context of Air Lines of Communications (ALOC) and Ground Lines of Communications (GLOC) signed in 2001 for air and ground support. Strategic Motives for the Revival in Relations Pakistan and the US strained relations need a revival due to compelling strategic motives. Pakistani National Security Advisor Mueed Yusuf Pirzada has placed the revival of US-Pakistan relations as a foremost priority. Pakistan and China now have a growing strategic partnership in various domains. However, Pakistan will still try to revive its strategic partnership with the US. Pakistan’s economic condition is challenging to the present government. Despite Khan’s provisional estimates of a 3.94% GDP growth rate during the fiscal year 2021; the Pakistani economy is still shackled with a lower growth rate, inflation, and debts. Moreover, the lingering sword of FATF, security and foreign policy challenges coupled with the threat of Afghan conflict spilling over into Pakistani soil after the US withdrawal are the strategic motives for the revival in the relations. The US alliance has brought significant military surpluses to Pakistan. Pakistan received a lavish amount of military and financial assistance accounting for almost 33 billion USD during 2002-17. According to CRS Report for Congress (2007), Pakistan received arm deliveries of 4.6 billion USD during 1999-2006. Similarly, during 1999-2002 the estimated assistance amounted to 2.8 billion USD. This made Pakistan the tenth-largest recipient of US military aid in the world. The US is looking towards the options available on its table regarding the military bases for the surveillance and the counter-terrorism operations after its withdrawal from Afghanistan. Pakistan is a feasible option for the US as compared to other options. This includes the Central Asian Republics, US Bases in the Gulf and US aircraft carriers in the Arabian Sea. The little clarity regarding CARs and the increased distance from the Gulf makes Pakistan a viable option for the US. Conclusion In a nutshell, the resumption of the US military training program shows the US commitment to strengthening bilateral military cooperation. It reflects the US’ Indo-Pacific strategy to professionalize the armed forces of regional partners. The role of Pakistan in the Afghan Peace Process has also nudged the US to revive the strained bilateral relations. Moreover, it also has given rise to the speculation

Read More »
Shopping Basket