Why did the U.S. leave behind such a vast stockpile of weapons in Afghanistan? Was it a mistake or a deliberate move? If it was a mistake, how did it happen? And if it was intentional, who was it aimed against—was Pakistan the target?
This is no ordinary incident. As the U.S. withdrew from Afghanistan, it left behind military equipment worth more than $7 billion. To put this into perspective, Pakistan’s entire defense budget is around $6 billion. This means the weapons and military gear left in Afghanistan exceed Pakistan’s total defense spending.
Leaving behind a small quantity of weapons could be understandable as part of an unplanned retreat. But when the value reaches $7 billion, it raises serious questions. Why did the U.S. abandon such a massive arsenal? What was the reason? What was the strategy?
According to a Pentagon report submitted to the U.S. Congress, the abandoned military equipment in Afghanistan includes aircraft, helicopters, ammunition, night vision goggles, and biometric devices. The U.S. Department of Defense reports that the U.S. left 78 helicopters and combat aircraft in Afghanistan. A key question arises: Why couldn’t these aircraft fly back to U.S. bases? What was the logic behind leaving them behind?
A report from Al Jazeera states that the Taliban acquired 61,000 U.S. military vehicles, 300,000 light weapons (such as rifles and small machine guns), and 26,000 heavy weapons. Looking at the numbers and the types of weapons, it’s evident that this is a vast arsenal—greater than what many national armies possess. Does anyone accidentally leave such massive firepower in enemy hands?
This is not a simple oversight. The U.S., known for its military precision, would not just forget its weapons in Afghanistan. Even in Hollywood movies, when American forces have to retreat, they either take their weapons with them or destroy them. Are we to believe that the U.S. military leadership was less competent than Hollywood scriptwriters? That they simply abandoned advanced weapons worth billions, neither transporting nor destroying them? Clearly, this was not a mistake—it was intentional. And it appears that Pakistan is the primary target of this decision.
The U.S. did not flee overnight from Afghanistan; it left under a negotiated agreement. There was ample time to plan the withdrawal and ensure that weapons did not fall into the wrong hands. Why didn’t the U.S. make proper arrangements to take its weapons back? If logistics were a problem, why didn’t they destroy the stockpile before leaving? Destroying weapons takes minutes, not days—yet even this was not done.
Now, as Pakistan faces increasing terrorist attacks, with 18 soldiers being martyred in a single day, we must ask: Was this an accident, a coincidence, or a calculated move to destabilize Pakistan?
Also See: Pakistan Urges Action Over US Weapons In Afghanistan
According to Foreign Policy Magazine, U.S.-made weapons left in Afghanistan have now entered the black market. The most sought-after weapon is the M-4 assault rifle, the same firearm being used against Pakistani forces in Balochistan. But the problem isn’t just one rifle—the real concern is that terrorist groups in Balochistan now possess U.S.-supplied weapons, making them far deadlier.
The recent rise in terrorist attacks in Pakistan is no coincidence. The weapons abandoned by the U.S. have played a major role in escalating violence. When heavily armed militants equipped with advanced American weapons confront local security forces, law enforcement struggles to respond effectively.
Even Donald Trump has questioned this decision, criticizing the Biden administration for leaving behind such a massive arsenal in Afghanistan. Trump’s statements suggest that the Biden administration’s official narrative—claiming that the weapons were destroyed—is false. The reality is far more serious.
It is no coincidence that Balochistan witnessed the highest number of terrorist incidents last year. According to official figures released by the Balochistan government, there were 555 terrorist attacks in a single year, resulting in 300 deaths, including civilians, police officers, and military personnel. For Pakistan, tackling this crisis is now a matter of national security.
Pakistan cannot remain silent. If 18 soldiers are being martyred in a single day, the state must respond. (It is also noteworthy that so-called human rights activists, who are quick to criticize the state, remain completely silent on these killings. Their selective outrage is another issue that needs attention.)
Even U.S. analysts now admit that the weapons left behind could ignite further conflict in the region. Western reports confirm that a new black market for advanced weapons has emerged, further fueling instability. Decisions made by powerful nations often leave weaker nations paying the price.
The U.S. must be held accountable on every international forum. Why was $7 billion worth of military equipment left behind? Was it an accident, a coincidence, or a strategic decision? If it was a mistake, who has been held responsible? And if it was deliberate, was Pakistan the target? Are we really supposed to believe that the world’s most powerful military accidentally left behind weapons worth billions?
SAT Commentaries’ are social media threads by various authors, reproduced here for website use. Views are their own.
Why Did the U.S. Leave $7 Billion Worth of Weapons in Afghanistan?
Why did the U.S. leave behind such a vast stockpile of weapons in Afghanistan? Was it a mistake or a deliberate move? If it was a mistake, how did it happen? And if it was intentional, who was it aimed against—was Pakistan the target?
This is no ordinary incident. As the U.S. withdrew from Afghanistan, it left behind military equipment worth more than $7 billion. To put this into perspective, Pakistan’s entire defense budget is around $6 billion. This means the weapons and military gear left in Afghanistan exceed Pakistan’s total defense spending.
Leaving behind a small quantity of weapons could be understandable as part of an unplanned retreat. But when the value reaches $7 billion, it raises serious questions. Why did the U.S. abandon such a massive arsenal? What was the reason? What was the strategy?
According to a Pentagon report submitted to the U.S. Congress, the abandoned military equipment in Afghanistan includes aircraft, helicopters, ammunition, night vision goggles, and biometric devices. The U.S. Department of Defense reports that the U.S. left 78 helicopters and combat aircraft in Afghanistan. A key question arises: Why couldn’t these aircraft fly back to U.S. bases? What was the logic behind leaving them behind?
A report from Al Jazeera states that the Taliban acquired 61,000 U.S. military vehicles, 300,000 light weapons (such as rifles and small machine guns), and 26,000 heavy weapons. Looking at the numbers and the types of weapons, it’s evident that this is a vast arsenal—greater than what many national armies possess. Does anyone accidentally leave such massive firepower in enemy hands?
This is not a simple oversight. The U.S., known for its military precision, would not just forget its weapons in Afghanistan. Even in Hollywood movies, when American forces have to retreat, they either take their weapons with them or destroy them. Are we to believe that the U.S. military leadership was less competent than Hollywood scriptwriters? That they simply abandoned advanced weapons worth billions, neither transporting nor destroying them? Clearly, this was not a mistake—it was intentional. And it appears that Pakistan is the primary target of this decision.
The U.S. did not flee overnight from Afghanistan; it left under a negotiated agreement. There was ample time to plan the withdrawal and ensure that weapons did not fall into the wrong hands. Why didn’t the U.S. make proper arrangements to take its weapons back? If logistics were a problem, why didn’t they destroy the stockpile before leaving? Destroying weapons takes minutes, not days—yet even this was not done.
Now, as Pakistan faces increasing terrorist attacks, with 18 soldiers being martyred in a single day, we must ask: Was this an accident, a coincidence, or a calculated move to destabilize Pakistan?
Also See: Pakistan Urges Action Over US Weapons In Afghanistan
According to Foreign Policy Magazine, U.S.-made weapons left in Afghanistan have now entered the black market. The most sought-after weapon is the M-4 assault rifle, the same firearm being used against Pakistani forces in Balochistan. But the problem isn’t just one rifle—the real concern is that terrorist groups in Balochistan now possess U.S.-supplied weapons, making them far deadlier.
The recent rise in terrorist attacks in Pakistan is no coincidence. The weapons abandoned by the U.S. have played a major role in escalating violence. When heavily armed militants equipped with advanced American weapons confront local security forces, law enforcement struggles to respond effectively.
Even Donald Trump has questioned this decision, criticizing the Biden administration for leaving behind such a massive arsenal in Afghanistan. Trump’s statements suggest that the Biden administration’s official narrative—claiming that the weapons were destroyed—is false. The reality is far more serious.
It is no coincidence that Balochistan witnessed the highest number of terrorist incidents last year. According to official figures released by the Balochistan government, there were 555 terrorist attacks in a single year, resulting in 300 deaths, including civilians, police officers, and military personnel. For Pakistan, tackling this crisis is now a matter of national security.
Pakistan cannot remain silent. If 18 soldiers are being martyred in a single day, the state must respond. (It is also noteworthy that so-called human rights activists, who are quick to criticize the state, remain completely silent on these killings. Their selective outrage is another issue that needs attention.)
Even U.S. analysts now admit that the weapons left behind could ignite further conflict in the region. Western reports confirm that a new black market for advanced weapons has emerged, further fueling instability. Decisions made by powerful nations often leave weaker nations paying the price.
The U.S. must be held accountable on every international forum. Why was $7 billion worth of military equipment left behind? Was it an accident, a coincidence, or a strategic decision? If it was a mistake, who has been held responsible? And if it was deliberate, was Pakistan the target? Are we really supposed to believe that the world’s most powerful military accidentally left behind weapons worth billions?
SAT Commentaries’ are social media threads by various authors, reproduced here for website use. Views are their own.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
Recent
When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance
The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System
As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal
The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography
The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.
Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation
The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.