Where Is Karnataka’s Hijab Controversy Headed?

Where Is Karnataka’s Hijab Controversy Headed?

What started in India’s Karnataka state as the “Hijab Row” is far from over. Considering the current state of affairs, where is Karnataka’s Hijab Controversy headed, necessitates to have a glimpse of an overall situation. Every day, new stories of exclusion, rioting, and harassment are reaching us from the state of Karnataka, and new sides of the controversy being unfolded. Social media chatter, unofficial sources, and citizen journalists from India are defining the situation as very serious and concerning. The High Court has reserved its verdict after eleven days of the hearing, but what is happening in the streets and Muslim localities is far from acceptable.

\"\"

Not just the streets and roads, even cyberspace is not safe for Muslim women of India; case in point being the app (Bulli Bai) where Muslim girls and women were up for auction. The app was later taken down. Legal action, sure, has its limitations, but having to witness the local police as the facilitator of riots indicates the complacency of the administration against the grave injustice and discrimination being faced by the Muslim locale in general and girl students in particular.

Zero Discrimination Day was just observed the world over, and India’s fuel-catching Karnataka episode is one of the most visible examples of discrimination and exclusion maintained on communal, religious, historical, and gender basis.

This year’s theme for Zero Discrimination Day focused on laws and policies with the tagline: “remove laws that harm, create laws that empower.” The theme tacitly implies that governments are increasingly responsible for maintaining a discrimination and failing to achieve inclusion that is not only desired on parameters of basic human dignity but also to avoid unnecessary conflict. Both pronounced and informally maintained policies of the Government of India towards India’s minorities stand in stark contrast to the ideal of inclusion.

Reports of Hindus rioting in Muslim localities in Karnataka are reminiscent of many similar incidents from history. Even if we do not delve into the long forgone and forgotten encounters of Hindu nationalists and Muslims, consider only the visuals that reached the world from the capital city of Delhi when the Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) was announced. Think of the minorities (especially Muslims) protesting on the streets and the forceful put-down they received.

What is happening in Karnataka might not be something new but it has some elements unique to it.

About five days ago, a Sikh girl student was asked to remove her turban to enter her college (Mount Carmel College). This happened in Karnataka’s capital city, Bengaluru. This also indicates how the row spread all over Karnataka to reach the capital city over a span of two months. Moreover, the fact that the Sikh community is now also a target speaks volumes. Now consider for a moment the birthplace of this whole controversy – a college in the Udupi district of Karnataka. Now consider the emphasis here – a college; an educational institute.

\"\"

It is alarming that the discrimination based in communal and religious grounds in India is now penetrating in as central a pillar of any society and polity as education.

The students who petitioned against the hijab ban and the students who wear hijab are not being allowed to take their exams; hence compromising and tainting their lives as students. Now consider once again, who is at the receiving end of this riot perpetrated by right-wing Hindu nationalists – girl students. So, where is Karnataka’s Hijab Controversy headed? This brings us to the question of how far and how much India can and will protect the basic rights of Indian women and girls? What is happening to the bold and loud advocacy of women rights in Indian society?

SAT Editorial Desk

Your go-to editorial hub for policy perspectives and informed analysis on pressing regional and global issues.

Recent

The End of Liberal Internationalism

The End of Liberal Internationalism

The 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy marks a decisive break from the post-1945 liberal order, replacing globalism and multilateralism with a neo-Westphalian focus on sovereign nation-states, fortified borders, and exclusionary spheres of influence. It signals America’s retreat from global leadership and the return of great-power rivalry.

Read More »
A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »