UN, Arab League Oppose Trump’s Proposal to Relocate Palestinians Outside Gaza

UN and Arab League oppose Trump's proposal to relocate Palestinians outside Gaza, citing violations of international law. [Image via The Nation]

The United Nations and the Arab League have both strongly opposed President Trump’s proposal to relocate Palestinians outside Gaza, citing grave concerns over violations of international law and humanitarian principles. The UN described the plan as a potential ethnic cleansing, undermining the rights and dignity of the Palestinian people. UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric emphasized, “We would be against any plan that would lead to the forced displacement of people, or would lead to any type of ethnic cleansing. ” He also expressed alarm over increased violence in the occupied West Bank, stating, “We’re very concerned about the deteriorating situation in the West Bank.”

The UN further noted the importance of regional opposition, including Egypt, Jordan, and the Arab League, to Trump’s proposal. These neighboring countries have warned against any forced relocation initiatives that could destabilize the region and worsen the humanitarian crisis.

Also See: Gaza Hostage and Ceasefire Deal Officially Signed

In parallel, the Arab League categorically rejected the relocation proposal, affirming that such measures violate international law and undermine peace efforts. The League stated, ” Attempts to uproot the Palestinian people from their land, whether through resettlement, annexation, or settlement expansion, have proven to fail in the past.” It added, ” Circumventing these established principles and longstanding commitments, which have garnered Arab and international consensus, will only prolong the conflict and make peace even more unattainable.”

The organization reiterated its stance on the Palestinian cause, highlighting that the conflict revolves around the land and rights of the Palestinian people. It stressed that past attempts to relocate or annex Palestinian territories have consistently failed and are “rejected and in violation of international law.”

Neighboring countries, including Jordan and Egypt, also voiced strong opposition. Jordan, with its large Palestinian population, warned that such initiatives could heighten regional tensions and further undermine Palestinian sovereignty. Similarly, Egypt emphasized that relocation efforts would threaten regional stability and called for solutions rooted in respect for Palestinian territorial and human rights.

The combined opposition by the UN, Arab League, and regional actors underscores the urgency of addressing the core issues of the conflict through a credible two-state solution to achieve lasting peace.

This news is sourced from The Nation and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Herat tragedy claims 30 lives, exposing Afghanistan’s governance failures, unsafe migration, and escalating humanitarian crisis.

Herat Border Tragedy: The Deadly Consequences of Afghanistan’s Governance Failures

The Herat border tragedy, is a stark illustration of the human cost of Afghanistan’s governance failures. With limited economic opportunities, widespread poverty, and insufficient social support, families are forced to undertake life-threatening journeys across freezing mountains. The incident underscores the urgent need for the Afghan government to provide stable livelihoods, establish safe migration routes, and strengthen healthcare and social services, as humanitarian risks continue to escalate across the country.

Read More »
A fact-based rebuttal of claims about Pakistani troop deployment in Gaza, exposing disinformation and reaffirming Pakistan’s UN-mandated peacekeeping doctrine.

Debunking the Gaza Deployment Narrative

False claims of a Pakistani troop deployment to Gaza, amplified by disinformation networks, were firmly rejected by the Foreign Office, reaffirming that Pakistan’s military operates only under UN mandates and constitutional limits.

Read More »
The death of Sharif Osman Hadi marks the collapse of the 1971 Consensus, reshaping Bangladesh’s identity and triggering a strategic crisis for India.

The End of the 1971 Consensus

Sharif Osman Hadi’s death has become the symbolic burial of the 1971 Consensus that long structured India–Bangladesh relations. For a generation with no lived memory of the Liberation War, Hadi embodies a Second Independence, reframing 1971 as the start of Indian dominance rather than true sovereignty. His killing has accelerated Bangladesh’s rupture with India and exposed a deep strategic crisis across South Asia.

Read More »
Afghanistan’s Taliban uses pharmaceutical policy to assert autonomy, decouple from Pakistan, and expand strategic ties with India.

Afghan Taliban’s Biopolitics

The Taliban’s health diplomacy is reshaping Afghanistan’s geopolitical landscape. By phasing out Pakistani pharmaceuticals and inviting Indian partnerships, Kabul securitizes its healthcare infrastructure as a tool of strategic realignment. The shift highlights the intersection of sovereignty, economic statecraft, and regional influence, with Afghan patients bearing the immediate consequences.

Read More »
Islamophobia after violent attacks fuels polarization, legitimizes collective blame, and undermines security while strengthening extremist narratives.

Who Benefits from Islamophobia?

In the wake of global violence, political actors often replace evidence-based analysis with collective blame. Islamophobia, when elevated from fringe rhetoric to state discourse, fractures society and weakens security.

Read More »