Trump Calls Afghanistan Withdrawal ‘Catastrophic,’ Criticizes Bagram Base Loss

Trump calls Afghanistan withdrawal catastrophic, claiming Bagram Air Base would have been key to countering China. [Image via Tolo News]

US President Donald Trump has described the withdrawal from Afghanistan as catastrophic and the most disgraceful day in US history.

In his latest remarks to Congress, he stated that if he had been president at the time of the withdrawal, he would never have abandoned Bagram Air Base.

Trump said: “Afghanistan disaster would have never happened—the most embarrassing moment in the history of our country—not leaving, I was going to leave. I’m the one that got him to a point where they could leave.”

According to Trump, Bagram Air Base, one of the world’s largest military bases, is significant to the US because of its proximity to China’s nuclear weapons manufacturing facilities.

He added: “I was going to keep it. Not for Afghanistan, because it’s one hour away from where China makes its nuclear weapons. Wouldn’t it be nice to have it? You know who occupies it now? China occupies it now.”

Also See: Ishaq Dar, Marco Rubio Discuss U.S. Arms Left in Afghanistan

Although the interim government has not responded to this issue, previously the Islamic Emirate’s spokesperson denied reports that China was managing the Bagram base and called Trump’s remarks imaginary.

“Trump’s comments and actions suggest he seeks to reclaim Bagram; however, this should not be done by force or coercion, as it is unlikely and could create problems for him,” said Aziz Maarej, former diplomat.

With the potential return of Donald Trump to power, Kabul-Washington relations are expected to change.
The suspension and cutting of US aid to Afghanistan, the visit of the US delegation to Kabul, and the release of three American citizens by the Islamic Emirate are among the most significant developments in the two countries’ relations over the past three months.

This news is sourced from Tolo News and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

From The Periphery to the Center: What People at Our Margins Endure

The South Asia Times (SAT) hosted a national webinar titled “From the Periphery to the Center: What People at Our Margins Endure,” spotlighting how Pakistan’s border regions, Balochistan, Gilgit-Baltistan, Azad Jammu & Kashmir, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, face deep-rooted governance challenges, economic neglect, and communication voids. Experts called for shifting from a security-centric to an inclusion-driven policy model to rebuild trust, empower youth, and turn Pakistan’s peripheries into engines of national resilience.

Read More »

The Indian Muslim: Living Between Faith and Fear

In September 2025, a simple expression of faith became a crime. When a devotional social media trend, the ‘I Love Muhammad’ campaign, went viral, it was deliberately framed as a provocation by authorities. The state’s response was swift and brutal: mass arrests and punitive demolitions that turned a peaceful act of devotion into a national flashpoint, revealing a clear intent to police and punish Muslim identity itself.

Read More »
Pakistan’s Stability: A Silent Pillar of US Strategic Interests

Pakistan’s Stability: A Silent Pillar of US Strategic Interests

Long seen through a security lens, Pakistan is now redefining its role in US strategy, as a supplier of critical minerals, a connectivity hub between Central and South Asia, and a stabilizing force in a volatile region. Amid global competition with China and shifting energy dynamics, Washington increasingly views Pakistan’s stability not as a choice but as a strategic necessity anchoring its economic and geopolitical interests across Asia.

Read More »
The Nobel Peace Prize or War Prize? A History of Controversial Laureates.

The Nobel Peace Prize or War Prize? A History of Controversial Laureates

Far from being an impartial recognition of pacifism, the Nobel Peace Prize’s legacy is marred by controversial laureates whose actions have been linked to immense violence. The prize is not a universal arbiter of peace but a political instrument reflecting a Western-centric worldview, rewarding figures who align with its geopolitical interests, regardless of the blood on their hands.

Read More »