Trump Calls Afghanistan Withdrawal ‘Catastrophic,’ Criticizes Bagram Base Loss

Trump calls Afghanistan withdrawal catastrophic, claiming Bagram Air Base would have been key to countering China. [Image via Tolo News]

US President Donald Trump has described the withdrawal from Afghanistan as catastrophic and the most disgraceful day in US history.

In his latest remarks to Congress, he stated that if he had been president at the time of the withdrawal, he would never have abandoned Bagram Air Base.

Trump said: “Afghanistan disaster would have never happened—the most embarrassing moment in the history of our country—not leaving, I was going to leave. I’m the one that got him to a point where they could leave.”

According to Trump, Bagram Air Base, one of the world’s largest military bases, is significant to the US because of its proximity to China’s nuclear weapons manufacturing facilities.

He added: “I was going to keep it. Not for Afghanistan, because it’s one hour away from where China makes its nuclear weapons. Wouldn’t it be nice to have it? You know who occupies it now? China occupies it now.”

Also See: Ishaq Dar, Marco Rubio Discuss U.S. Arms Left in Afghanistan

Although the interim government has not responded to this issue, previously the Islamic Emirate’s spokesperson denied reports that China was managing the Bagram base and called Trump’s remarks imaginary.

“Trump’s comments and actions suggest he seeks to reclaim Bagram; however, this should not be done by force or coercion, as it is unlikely and could create problems for him,” said Aziz Maarej, former diplomat.

With the potential return of Donald Trump to power, Kabul-Washington relations are expected to change.
The suspension and cutting of US aid to Afghanistan, the visit of the US delegation to Kabul, and the release of three American citizens by the Islamic Emirate are among the most significant developments in the two countries’ relations over the past three months.

This news is sourced from Tolo News and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »