Sri Lanka: The Great Economic Recession

Sri Lankan protesters storm PM Ranil Wickremesinghe 's office, demanding he resign [Rafiq Maqbool/AP]

Sri Lanka’s foreign debt has risen sharply since 2010, hitting 88 percent of the country’s GDP in 2019. The global recession caused by the COVID-19 pandemic intensified the crisis, and by 2021, the country’s foreign debt had risen to 101 percent of its GDP, precipitating an economic collapse. Political parties have organized several protests, requesting the present Gotabaya administration to fix the financial issue and resign immediately due to the economic catastrophe. Recently, the protests have become so violent that the protesters chanting “Go home Gota, go home!” and “Gota is a dictator” have tried to attack the private residence of the Srilankan President yesternight. In consequence, a curfew has been imposed in Colombo. The police have also labeled the protestors as ‘organized extremists’ spreading chaos amid the worsening Sri Lankan economic crisis. This crisis is also manifested in the decline in the foreign reserves since President Rajapaksa took office in 2019, going from $7.5 billion to $2.1 billion at the end of February 2022.

Sri Lanka: An Economic Emergency

The Sri Lankan government resorted to using reserves to artificially hold the rupee below 200. This plan worked well until the government ran out of dollars, at which point it erupted, rising from 200 LKR to 280 LKR in a matter of days.

The shortage of U.S. dollars in the country led to a ripple effect on the prices of most ESSENTIAL food items and raw materials.

Policymakers struggled with the dual challenge of managing overseas debt repayments while meeting domestic needs. In September, Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa issued an economic emergency. It authorized the federal government to seize control of the supply of basic food goods and set prices in order to keep soaring inflation under control, which reached 14.2% in January.

Sri Lanka’s Debt Pile

Colombo borrowed billions from China between 2005 and 2015, amassing a pile of debt.

After failing to keep up with payments, it was obliged to hand the port of Hambantota to a Chinese corporation. Beijing, on the other hand, kept increasing its lending. The island nation’s tourism-dependent economy was struck another hit by Covid-19, adding to the debt burden. The financial burden caused by the pandemic had been enormous, with government revenues being put under severe strain since the major revenue-generating tourist sector had been essentially on hold since early 2020. Remittances from migrant workers also took a massive hit. In September, Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa issued an economic emergency. It authorized the federal government to seize control of the supply of basic food goods and set prices in order to keep soaring inflation under control, which reached 14.2% in January.

Turning Towards IMF

The typical approach to a catastrophic Balance of Payments situation like this is to seek IMF assistance. In fact, the IMF was created specifically to help nations in dealing with the Balance of Payments problems. Despite this, the Sri Lankan government declined to seek IMF aid or restructure debt. Because the government is resolute about not soliciting IMF help, they were searching for other ways to address the economic situation. Import restrictions were insufficient to close the external financial deficit, given the severity of the crisis. Sri Lanka needed to enhance its influx of foreign funds.

Sri Lanka’s Aides

In light of this, the Sri Lankan government began to seek assistance from two global rivals: India and China. Sri Lanka has had significant economic relationships with both of these nations for decades; in particular, economic ties with China grew stronger in the last 20 years, with China emerging as Sri Lanka’s largest bilateral lender and FDI investor.

The Sri Lankan government’s decision to seek financial aid from China and India was most likely due to their reticence to implement the IMF-mandated economic reforms.

Obtaining IMF aid would entail modifying most of the Rajapaksa government’s economic policies and implementing economic reforms.  However, such criteria differ from those advised by other lenders, because China’s and India’s objectives are primarily geopolitical, as opposed to the IMF’s economic goals.

Chinese Debt Trap

Despite the sensationalist portrayal of Sri Lanka as more than just a victim of a Chinese “debt trap,” the country’s economic problems extend well beyond China. Deep-seated economic difficulties that have gone untreated for decades are to blame for the country’s economic predicament. Sri Lanka continues to borrow from the foreign capital market by issuing ISBs rather than dealing with these challenges. By the end of 2021, ISBs accounted for 36% of Sri Lanka’s outstanding foreign debt stock, whereas China accounted for just roughly 14% of the overall public debt.

China’s Belt and Road Initiative is widely criticized due to Sri Lanka’s economic collapse and lease of Hambantota port.

But Sri Lanka’s debt trap is primarily the result of domestic policy decisions and Western lending and monetary decisions, not the Chinese government’s policies. China’s assistance to Sri Lanka was focused on encouraging investment rather than a debt-for-asset swap. In actuality, the tale of Hambantota Port is one of political and economic ineptitude, aided by sloppy administration and poor risk management on both sides.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own. They do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.

Muhammad Saad

Muhammad Saad is an ardent reader, writer, and researcher, keen to explore international relations, political science, and regional affairs.

Recent

The Nobel Peace Prize or War Prize? A History of Controversial Laureates.

The Nobel Peace Prize or War Prize? A History of Controversial Laureates

Far from being an impartial recognition of pacifism, the Nobel Peace Prize’s legacy is marred by controversial laureates whose actions have been linked to immense violence. The prize is not a universal arbiter of peace but a political instrument reflecting a Western-centric worldview, rewarding figures who align with its geopolitical interests, regardless of the blood on their hands.

Read More »
An analysis of a false Financial Times report on a Pakistan-US port deal, its journalistic flaws, and its weaponization for political gain.

Geopolitics, Journalism, and the Anatomy of a False Narrative

A recent Financial Times story claimed Pakistan was pitching a new Arabian Sea port to the US Built on anonymous sources and logical flaws, the report was quietly corrected. This article dissects how the flimsy reporting was weaponized by domestic and regional actors to push a false narrative, revealing more about their political agendas than Pakistan’s foreign policy.

Read More »
An analysis of the Trump Gaza peace plan. Despite Hamas's surprise support, deep divides over security and sovereignty threaten any chance of lasting peace.

The Promises and Perils of the New Gaza Plan

A new Gaza peace plan by Donald Trump has international backing and a surprising partial acceptance from Hamas. However, its journey toward lasting peace is threatened by critical deal-breakers and the unresolved core question of Palestinian political sovereignty.

Read More »
Pakistan’s associate membership at CERN marks a milestone in science and technology collaboration. By partnering with the world’s leading particle physics center, Pakistan is strengthening innovation, research, and high-tech industry integration, paving the way for economic and scientific advancement.

Pakistan’s Path to Innovation through CERN Partnership

Pakistan’s growing partnership with CERN highlights its rising role in global science and technology. As the first South Asian state to become an associate member, Pakistan is advancing research, training young scientists, and opening doors for high-tech industry and innovation through its collaboration with the world’s leading particle physics center.

Read More »