Russia-Ukraine Conflict: Selective Morality and Outrage of the Western World

Russia-Ukraine Conflict: Selective Morality and Outrage of the Western World

 

What we have witnessed in the last few weeks is the height of propaganda tactics and an immaculate display of misinformation warfare, particularly by the Western States and media. The Russia-Ukraine conflict highlighted several important aspects, but one thing that came into the limelight was the hypocrisy of the western states, international organizations, and media in dealing with the crisis. At present, around the globe, many innocent people are suffering, not just the Ukrainians, all victims deserve support, whether it’s moral, legal, or humanitarian. Picking one and ignoring the rest is appalling and inhumane.

War is abhorrent and destructive, wherever it is. For the last two decades, the world has seen some of the worst human rights abuses in the name of wars, but nothing stirred the conscience of the ‘civilized western world’ the way the Russian invasion of Ukraine did. War caused devastation and killed millions in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria. Palestinians are being killed on a daily basis at the hands of Israeli occupation forces. Yemen and Syria are under intense bombardment by the US, Israel, and the allies. However, the way Ukraine garnered support, sympathy, and consideration, is unprecedented and unmatched in recent times.

The question is, why the entire western world was moved by the aggression in Ukraine and not elsewhere?

Western Media Coverage of Russia-Ukraine Conflict

The ‘selective morality’ and ‘double standards’ of the so-called ‘civilized, more western and more European world’ garnered a selective response. Ironically, Europeans were the major colonizers and they whitewashed the indigenous communities wherever they went. The World Wars were fought mostly between the civilized states, the ‘white European people’. After all that happened, it’s such an irony that many of the media commentators and analysts think that ‘war belongs to the Middle East or Asia,’ implying that some people are less worthy of justice. When people with influence say that it is alien to see a war in Europe, or when commentators reflect that Ukraine is a ‘relatively civilized and European’ and ‘European people with blonde hair and blue eyes’ are being killed with ‘carefully chosen words,’ it reflects the height of white supremacist mentality.

Ukraine might not have seen war in ages, but that doesn’t mean that war anywhere else is less condemnable or justified.

Western Justifications for Non-Western Wars

It’s appalling to see the selective outrage of the Western World, where the shades of so-called ‘morality’ shift in accordance with race, color, religion, and nationality. This systematic ‘othering’ and dehumanization has led the Western World to think that they deserve to live and others can die or war other than in Europe/West is acceptable. This discriminating morality is consuming our world and soon it will be devastating beyond imagination. Because when those lecturing the world on ‘human rights, international law and aggression’ are killing innocent civilians for years, they become least credible. The West, the United States, and international organizations which are showing ‘concern’ for Ukraine have practically lost reliability and integrity because of their continued silence and indifference on Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and anywhere the aggressors are from the West.

Mistake, collateral damage, self-defense are the terms used to provide justifications for west-led aggressions. But for everyone else, they have sanctions and United Nations emergency sessions. The United States defied international laws an uncountable number of times. Israel commits human rights abuses on a daily basis. So it is downright comical how nothing ever happened and no sanction ever took place. As a student of conflict studies, I consider it highly unfair to draw comparisons to determine which conflict zone is more violent. But the utter numbness of the world on Africa, the Middle East, Palestine, Kashmir, and Afghanistan is shocking.

We should stop ‘normalizing’ war; it is as unusual in the West as on any other corner of the earth.

It is not justifiable and normal in the Middle East, Africa, or any other place in the world.

Human lives matter wherever they are, whoever they are.

Anywhere in the world, whoever bleeds, the blood is red.

 

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own. They do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.

SAT Editorial Desk

Your go-to editorial hub for policy perspectives and informed analysis on pressing regional and global issues.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »