Nepal Arrests Indian National with Semi-Automatic Pistol Near Border

Nepal arrests an Indian national with a semi-automatic pistol, raising concerns over arms smuggling and regional security. [Image via SAT Creatives]

Nepalese authorities have arrested an Indian national in possession of a semi-automatic pistol and ammunition near the Nepal-India border. The Armed Police Force (APF) apprehended 26-year-old Dhananjay Kumar Jha from Bihar on the night of January 19, 2025 at Lathmari in Ishnath Municipality, following a tip-off about suspicious activities involving three individuals at Sunil Hotel. While Jha was arrested with the weapon, the other two suspects managed to flee. This incident has raised serious security concerns, highlighting a potential nexus between Indian nationals and arms smuggling networks.

The arrest of the Indian national in Nepal, found in possession of a semi-automatic weapon, raises further alarms about the spread of illicit weapons across borders.

Also See: Trump’s Aid Freeze Disrupts Development Projects in Nepal and Pakistan

India’s growing arms trade has come under scrutiny for its ethical and legal implications.
Reports suggest that Indian entities are actively involved in supplying surveillance equipment, artillery, and missiles to regimes accused of violent repression. These actions not only fuel regional instability but also raise questions about India’s commitment to international humanitarian and customary law. The export of such weaponry by state-owned Indian firms directly contradicts its obligations under these frameworks, putting its global credibility at risk.

This is not the first time India has been at the center of international controversy. Recent allegations of extraterritorial killings on foreign soil have drawn condemnation from major global powers, including Canada, the US, and Australia.

These incidents expose a troubling pattern of misconduct, further suggesting potential ties between Indian entities and illicit networks, including smugglers and terrorist groups. The arrest in Nepal adds another layer to these concerns, emphasizing the need for strict oversight on arms trafficking and border security cooperation.

Furthermore, India’s involvement in smuggling activities directly undermines its commitments as a signatory to the United Nation drug conventions. These conventions are designed to combat transnational crime, yet India’s alleged complicity in such activities challenges the integrity of these global agreements. Despite wielding significant diplomatic and economic influence, India has largely escaped international accountability. The muted response from the global community has granted it unchecked impunity, allowing these violations to persist.

Indian civil society must take a proactive role in challenging these unlawful practices within state institutions to ensure transparency and accountability. The international community, too, must remain impartial and united in addressing these violations effectively. Holding India accountable through stringent measures is crucial, as its actions pose a multifaceted threat to global security, ethical governance, and the rule of law. The latest arrest in Nepal is yet another warning sign that demands urgent international attention.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »