Indian democracy challenged: June 25, 1975

Former Indian PM Indira Gandhi

1975 is perhaps the most controversial period of democratic Indian history. The period marks the suspension of elections, restrictions of liberties and censorship of the press.

President Fakhruddin Ahmed declared a state of emergency upon the advice of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on the night of 25th June 1975. This state of emergency lasted from 1975-1977 under Article 352 of the Constitution because of the ongoing internal disturbance.

Imposition of Emergency

President Fakhruddin Ahmed proclaimed an emergency that lasted for almost 21 months. The unfavourable situation emanated the suspension of the elections and restricted liberties. As a result of which, the Government arrested the political opponents of Indira Gandhi and imposed media censorship. The period also witnessed Human Rights violations and is therefore perhaps the most controversial period of Indian history.

Factors Leading Towards Emergency

War, Refugees, Economy and Political ghost – All led Indira Gandhi towards a decision, which later on became a historical event of Indian political history.

Subsequent to the 1971’s war, the Indian economy was in dire straits, following the high influx of refugees. The US Government also stopped the aids to India which ultimately led to distress in public and an increase in commodity prices. Moreover, the slowdown in industrial growth, a high rate of unemployment and the government’s move to freeze the salaries of its employees caused an environment of public dissatisfaction. Similarly, adding to the already deteriorating political landscape the delay in monsoon during 1972-73 also affected the food grain output, resulting in the unrest of the general populace.

In January 1974, the students in Gujarat started protesting regarding the surge in food prices, basic necessities and corruption in the government.

This protest soon garnered the support of the opposition parties which led to the imposition of the President’s rule in the state. They also began to demand fresh elections.

Similarly, in 1974 the students in Bihar started protests against the government on the same issues and invited Jayaprakash Narayan, a civil society leader who was engaged in social work and had given up from politics. On 25th June, Narayan led a huge rally in Delhi where he demanded Indira Gandhi’s resignation. Consequently, in June 1975, elections took place in Gujarat, which Congress eventually lost.

Petition Against Indira Gandhi

Another ghost from the past started haunting Indra Gandhi. It was from the elections of 1971. Indira Gandhi defeated Raj Narain from the Janata Party during the 1971’s Parliamentary elections. Subsequently, Raj Narain filed a petition in Allahabad High Court against Indira Gandhi; for fraud in elections and the misuse of state machinery.

On June 12, 1975, the High Court found Indira Gandhi guilty of misusing the state’s machinery and declared the elections as void. Moreover, she was also disqualified as a Member of Parliament (MP) and barred from the election for six years.

Indira then moved towards Supreme Court against the High Court’s verdict. On 24th June 1975, Supreme Court allowed her to remain the Prime Minister but debarred her from voting as an MP until the final verdict came.

Declaration of Emergency

This all culminated into desperate steps. Indira Gandhi, the iron lady of India, went for an authoritarian step – A declaration of emergency through the president of India.

The protests and demonstrations started against Indira Gandhi across the country. President Fakhruddin Ahmed then declared a state of emergency on June 25th 1975. All the opposition leaders including Jayaprakash Narayan, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, LK Advani and Morarji Desai were arrested. Alongside this, Fakhruddin placed censorship on media and ordered the arrest of multiple senior journalists. In the process, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and Jamaat e Islami were also banned by the government.

Furthermore, in the background of the Allahabad court verdict, a Constitutional amendment was made. The changes announced that the election of the President, Prime Minister and Vice President could not be challenged in the court. Hence, the verdict is the reflection of authoritarian rule under the garb of democracy.

Congress Faces Defeat

In January 1977, the Indian Government decided to hold an election 1977. The opposition became united under the flag of the Janata Party under the leadership of JP Narayan. The elections marked the defeat of Congress in the Lok Sabha elections. It could only manage to win 154 seats in Lok Sabha, while Janata Party got 295 seats. Resultantly, Rae Bareli defeated Indira Gandhi in the elections. This marked the end of the era of one of the most cherished leaders of India.

Also See: 24th April 1929 – The First Non-Stop Flight to British India

Shaheer Ahmed

Shaheer Ahmed

Shaheer Ahmed is a research scholar passionate about analyzing diplomatic relations and political dynamics between nations, focusing on their impact on global power structures.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »