Indian democracy challenged: June 25, 1975

Former Indian PM Indira Gandhi

1975 is perhaps the most controversial period of democratic Indian history. The period marks the suspension of elections, restrictions of liberties and censorship of the press.

President Fakhruddin Ahmed declared a state of emergency upon the advice of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on the night of 25th June 1975. This state of emergency lasted from 1975-1977 under Article 352 of the Constitution because of the ongoing internal disturbance.

Imposition of Emergency

President Fakhruddin Ahmed proclaimed an emergency that lasted for almost 21 months. The unfavourable situation emanated the suspension of the elections and restricted liberties. As a result of which, the Government arrested the political opponents of Indira Gandhi and imposed media censorship. The period also witnessed Human Rights violations and is therefore perhaps the most controversial period of Indian history.

Factors Leading Towards Emergency

War, Refugees, Economy and Political ghost – All led Indira Gandhi towards a decision, which later on became a historical event of Indian political history.

Subsequent to the 1971’s war, the Indian economy was in dire straits, following the high influx of refugees. The US Government also stopped the aids to India which ultimately led to distress in public and an increase in commodity prices. Moreover, the slowdown in industrial growth, a high rate of unemployment and the government’s move to freeze the salaries of its employees caused an environment of public dissatisfaction. Similarly, adding to the already deteriorating political landscape the delay in monsoon during 1972-73 also affected the food grain output, resulting in the unrest of the general populace.

In January 1974, the students in Gujarat started protesting regarding the surge in food prices, basic necessities and corruption in the government.

This protest soon garnered the support of the opposition parties which led to the imposition of the President’s rule in the state. They also began to demand fresh elections.

Similarly, in 1974 the students in Bihar started protests against the government on the same issues and invited Jayaprakash Narayan, a civil society leader who was engaged in social work and had given up from politics. On 25th June, Narayan led a huge rally in Delhi where he demanded Indira Gandhi’s resignation. Consequently, in June 1975, elections took place in Gujarat, which Congress eventually lost.

Petition Against Indira Gandhi

Another ghost from the past started haunting Indra Gandhi. It was from the elections of 1971. Indira Gandhi defeated Raj Narain from the Janata Party during the 1971’s Parliamentary elections. Subsequently, Raj Narain filed a petition in Allahabad High Court against Indira Gandhi; for fraud in elections and the misuse of state machinery.

On June 12, 1975, the High Court found Indira Gandhi guilty of misusing the state’s machinery and declared the elections as void. Moreover, she was also disqualified as a Member of Parliament (MP) and barred from the election for six years.

Indira then moved towards Supreme Court against the High Court’s verdict. On 24th June 1975, Supreme Court allowed her to remain the Prime Minister but debarred her from voting as an MP until the final verdict came.

Declaration of Emergency

This all culminated into desperate steps. Indira Gandhi, the iron lady of India, went for an authoritarian step – A declaration of emergency through the president of India.

The protests and demonstrations started against Indira Gandhi across the country. President Fakhruddin Ahmed then declared a state of emergency on June 25th 1975. All the opposition leaders including Jayaprakash Narayan, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, LK Advani and Morarji Desai were arrested. Alongside this, Fakhruddin placed censorship on media and ordered the arrest of multiple senior journalists. In the process, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and Jamaat e Islami were also banned by the government.

Furthermore, in the background of the Allahabad court verdict, a Constitutional amendment was made. The changes announced that the election of the President, Prime Minister and Vice President could not be challenged in the court. Hence, the verdict is the reflection of authoritarian rule under the garb of democracy.

Congress Faces Defeat

In January 1977, the Indian Government decided to hold an election 1977. The opposition became united under the flag of the Janata Party under the leadership of JP Narayan. The elections marked the defeat of Congress in the Lok Sabha elections. It could only manage to win 154 seats in Lok Sabha, while Janata Party got 295 seats. Resultantly, Rae Bareli defeated Indira Gandhi in the elections. This marked the end of the era of one of the most cherished leaders of India.

Also See: 24th April 1929 – The First Non-Stop Flight to British India

Shaheer Ahmed

Shaheer Ahmed

Shaheer Ahmed is a research scholar passionate about analyzing diplomatic relations and political dynamics between nations, focusing on their impact on global power structures.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »