Japan Provides Grant to Ensure Free and Fair Polls in Sri Lanka

The government of Japan has announced a grant for the island nation. It is worth a little over 45000 USD, approximately Rs. 8.5 million. The grant falls under its Grant Assistance for Grassroots Human Security Projects (GGP).

Moreover, Japan calls it ‘The Project for Sustaining Democratisation through the Implementation of Free and Fair Election in Sri Lanka.’ Sri Lanka’s upcoming General Elections are on 5th August 2020. The grant has been provided to conduct election monitoring and educate voters.

The Signing

Furthermore, Charge d’ Affairs ad interim of the Embassy of Japan, Kitamura Toshihiro, and Executive Director of the People’s Action for Free and Fair Elections (PAFFREL), Rohana Hettiarachchi, signed the grant contract yesterday.

Formalities took place at the ambassador’s residence in Colombo. Additionally, this project will contribute to encouraging Sri Lankans to exercise their franchise freely and fairly. Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, the country is has put off polls twice previously. Japan extended its support to PAFFREL to convey its solidarity with Sri Lanka.

What will the grant help with?

PAFFREL is a leading local election monitoring organization. They will initiate election-related activities.

Election observers will be a part of training programs. They will then be at polling and counting stations nationwide. Also, the project will educate voters through multimedia platforms such as TV, new papers, and radio.

Japan hopes this electoral assistance through PAFFREL will have a large outreach and ensure inclusive political participation of all citizens.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Afghanistan’s Trade Boycott: Strategic Miscalculation With Fiscal Consequences

Afghanistan’s Trade Boycott: Strategic Miscalculation With Fiscal Consequences

Afghanistan’s 2025 trade boycott of Pakistan exposes a strategic miscalculation. Despite efforts to shift toward Iran and Central Asia, Kabul remains structurally dependent on Pakistan’s mature trade corridors, customs revenue, labour mobility, and logistical efficiency. Alternative routes carry higher costs, sanctions risks, and operational delays, leaving the Taliban with mounting fiscal losses and regional constraints.

Read More »
The Defund Taliban Campaign

The Defund Taliban Campaign

The Defund Taliban Campaign examines how indirect US funding and a $7 billion abandoned arsenal have turned the Taliban into a regional force multiplier for militant groups.

Read More »
The Taliban’s new fatwa banning foreign militancy signals a shift in doctrine, but rising regional attacks and ideological fractures raise questions about its enforceability.

Doctrine vs Reality: Can the Taliban Enforce Their Ban on Foreign Militants?

The Taliban’s new fatwa banning foreign militants has been hailed by officials in Kabul as a decisive theological shift. But rising attacks in the north, continued TTP operations, and mounting pressure from Washington expose a widening gap between doctrine and reality. As regional powers demand proof of enforcement, the decree risks becoming another symbolic gesture unless it translates into measurable action on the ground.

Read More »
Deconstructing the Pakistan-Afghanistan Economic Crisis

Deconstructing the Pakistan-Afghanistan Economic Crisis

The Pakistan-Afghanistan trade freeze is widely framed as a punitive economic move, yet its roots lie in a severe security breakdown emanating from Afghan territory. Pakistan’s transit closures are reactive, not aggressive, and Afghanistan’s deep logistical dependence on Pakistani routes exposes the crisis as geopolitical, not commercial.

Read More »
Criminalising Dissent: How New Laws and “Public Order” Politics Are Shrinking Democratic Space in India

Criminalising Dissent: How New Laws and “Public Order” Politics Are Shrinking Democratic Space in India

India is witnessing a steady erosion of democratic freedoms as broad security laws, digital surveillance, and administrative restrictions redefine dissent as a threat rather than a constitutional right. From expanded use of UAPA and IT Rules to routine protest crackdowns and shrinking academic space, the cumulative impact is a quieter and increasingly constrained civic sphere.

Read More »