India: The Increasing Violence Against Sikhs

Despite being the world’s largest democracy, India has repeatedly faced criticism for violating the human rights and liberties of those under its jurisdiction. As the administration of Prime Minister Modi launched a crackdown against Waris Punjab De (WPD), the wounds left by “Operation Blue Star,” a military operation that resulted in the deaths of thousands of Sikhs in 1984, remained fresh.  Along with Muslims and Christians, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)-affiliated Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is now targeting Sikhs in India. In stark contrast to Gandhi and Nehru’s vision of a secular India, the Modi government’s treatment of minorities is indicative of its desire to transform India into a Hindu state.

Waris Punjab De: The Crackdown

Sikh minorities concentrated in Punjab are more vulnerable to state violence, particularly WPD followers and other Sikhs who have faced harsh persecution. This action has sparked outrage in the Sikh community, both in India and abroad.

 Furthermore, there are grave concerns that Amritpal will be eliminated in staged police encounters in order to quell the Sikh rights movement.

Amritpal is a prominent leader of the Khalistan Movement, which was established in the 1940s after decades of Sikhs asserting their separate identity. In Amritsar, authorities conducted raids at a gurdwara and a drug rehabilitation center run by the WPD. There are fears that the police will file fictitious criminal charges against many of the Sikhs detained during the current searches. In addition, a substantial number of Sikhs who have already served their court-imposed sentences remain illegally incarcerated in Indian prisons.

Deep Sidhu, WPD’s founder and first leader, passed away, and Amritpal Singh Sandhu ascended to the helm. Almost immediately thereafter, the state apparatus began to harass him by revoking the weapon permits of his guards and imprisoning his allies. Before the start of the crackdown, mobile phone service was blocked in Sri Muktsar Sahib and Fazilka districts on March 18, 2023, when Section 144 was implemented. Amritpal Singh and his other associates were among the many Sikhs detained by the police.

India: The Diaspora of Sikhs

The perceived persecution of the Sikh minority in Indian Punjab, in particular, and India, in general, has infuriated the Sikh diaspora.

International mayhem has been unleashed. Members of the Sikh diaspora in London walked the streets and gathered in front of the Indian High Commission to deliver a letter of complaint to the Indian ambassador. During the protest, an enraged Sikh community member attempted to replace the Indian flag with the flag of Khalistan.

The World Sikh Organization of Canada (WSO) criticized the “security” measures taken in Punjab to apprehend Amritpal Singh. In a press release, WSO stated that state-wide cordon and search operations were now in effect throughout Punjab. It went on to express concern that the pandemonium surrounding “Brother” Amritpal Singh’s detention could be used to stage a fake encounter and rationalize his unlawful execution. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, the Punjab police frequently employed a similar tactic to eliminate Sikh activists, the group emphasized. In addition to requesting the immediate restoration of civil rights and Internet access in Punjab, the letter implored the Canadian government to hold India accountable for its actions.

Jagmeet Singh, one of the leaders of the New Democratic Party in Canada, stated“I am deeply concerned about reports that India has suspended civil liberties and imposed an internet blackout throughout the state of Punjab.” Moreover, he stated that such draconian measures unnerved several individuals owing to the way they were used in extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances that occurred during the 1984 Sikh Genocide.

The Plight of Indian Minorities

The use of force by Indian authorities against unarmed people, especially members of minority groups, is not unprecedented.

In several instances throughout Indian history, the government has been complicit in attacks on civilians.

Indian policy toward the Sikh population is at present seemingly consistent with its treatment of the Muslim population in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IOJK). The fate of Indian minorities is contingent upon the international community’s efforts to restrain the brutality of its extremist government. During the G20 Summit, which will be held in Kashmir under India’s presidency, major international stakeholders will have the opportunity to discuss human rights violations, the right to self-determination, and the mistreatment of Muslim and Sikh minorities.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own. They do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.

Sara Nazir

Sara Nazir

Sara Nazir, MS in Strategic Studies, Visiting Faculty at IIUI, excels in research on South Asian nuclear politics and hybrid warfare. She can be reached on X, formerly Twitter at @SaraNazir13.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »