Fact or Fiction? DSN’s Troubling Pakistan Coverage

Explore Drop Site News (DSN's) reporting practices, biases, and its role in amplifying narratives targeting Pakistan's state institutions. [Image via Shutterstock]

Islamabad: Drop Site News (DSN), a United States-based investigative journalism platform launched in July 2024, is at the center of a storm over its reporting practices and perceived biases. The platform, led by prominent journalists Jeremy Scahill, Ryan Grim, and Murtaza Hussain, claims to focus on exposing global conflicts and covert operations. However, a recent study by G5iO Observatory highlights DSN’s questionable ethics, particularly in its sensationalist reporting and political alignments.

The Data Speaks

The study analyzed 151 articles published by DSN, uncovering key trends:

  • Key contributors: Ryan Grim authored 51 articles, with Jeremy Scahill and Murtaza Hussain dominating the content landscape.
  • Focus areas: The United States was the most frequently covered, followed by Israel-Palestine and Pakistan.
  • Sensationalism: Approximately 35% of the articles relied on unverified sources or exaggerated claims of leaked documents.

DSN’s narrative on Pakistan drew particular attention for its alignment with the alleged supporters of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). False claims about Pakistan’s military and foreign policy—such as seeking nuclear assistance from China or alleged directives by the military to counter political narratives online—were identified as part of a coordinated disinformation effort.

Targeted Reporting on Pakistan Amid a Digital Proxy War

This study by G5iO Observatory is crucial as it comes at a time when Pakistan, after carrying out precision strikes on Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) sites within Afghanistan, is facing a digital proxy war on social media. The campaign targets the Pakistan Army, labeling it as a “Napak” and “Zionist.” 

Notably, Alleged supporters of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM), and certain ethno-cultural factions notably projected this narrative.

Earlier, in December 2024, individuals reportedly held overseas sessions to propagate anti-Pakistan and anti-military sentiments in the aftermath of November 26 clashes between the Pakistan Government and PTI supporters. These sessions called for direct foreign intervention, with US and British nationals of Pakistani origin at the forefront.

However, Imran Khan’s lawyer clarified in a podcast with Pakistan Now that PTI had no connection to such efforts. He stated, “People who call themselves supporters but hold no party position are carrying out these activities. PTI’s narrative comes solely from Imran Khan.”

Also See: Drop Site News: The Disinformation Blueprint Against Pakistan

Ryan Grim and DSN’s Role

The G5iO Observatory identified Ryan Grim and Drop Site News among the foreign nationals and entities amplifying the narratives of alleged PTI supporters overseas. G5iO’s data also reveals that:

  • Ryan Grim: Authored 51 articles critical of Pakistan, with a heavy reliance on unverified sources.
  • DSN’s official account: Amplified politically charged content, portraying Pakistan’s state institutions negatively.

The Larger Picture

While DSN markets itself as an investigative platform, experts argue it undermines journalistic principles by prioritizing sensationalism. Critics contend that platforms like DSN deepen public mistrust in media and exacerbate political polarization.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »