Chinese National Accused of Blasphemy Is Another Test for China-Pakistan Ties

Chinese National Accused of Blasphemy Is Another Test for China-Pakistan Ties South Asia Times (satimes.tv)

The incident could reinforce existing concerns about Chinese workers’ safety in Pakistan, and a pull-out by China could be disastrous for Pakistan’s economy.

On April 17, a Chinese national accused of blasphemy was arrested in the Kohistan district of Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. The accused – identified only by his surname, Tian – is an engineer in charge of heavy machinery for China Gezhouba Group Company at the Dasu hydropower project. He was accused of blasphemy by local drivers working under his supervision.
According to local reporting, a row erupted on April 15 when Tian reprimanded his subordinates for taking a longer time than specified for offering afternoon prayers. During the ensuing argument, Tian reportedly made derogatory remarks against Allah and Prophet Muhammad, as alleged in the formal police complaint filed against the Chinese national.

The accusation was followed by protests from enraged locals, who blocked the main highway that connects Pakistan to China. The protest came to an end after police arrested Tian and lodged an FIR against the accused under section 295-C of the Pakistan Penal Code, which carries the death penalty.

Although the details of this case are yet to come out, we have repeatedly witnessed the mala fide intentions behind other such cases. Blasphemy is a very sensitive issue in Pakistan. A mere allegation of blasphemy can place the accused in hot water. Given the fact that a large number of people can be mobilized instantly on the issue of blasphemy, such accusations have been repeatedly used by individuals to settle personal vendettas. There are many examples of such false accusations; however, the most gruesome and relevant case is the mob lynching of Priyantha Kumara.

Kumara, a 49-year-old Sri Lankan national, was working as a general manager in a local garments factory in Sialkot. He was lynched by an enraged mob on December 3, 2021, over allegations of blasphemy. The allegation turned out to be false, as the investigation later revealed that the workers involved in the gruesome incident disliked Kumara for being strict in enforcing discipline.

The same dynamics seems to be in play in the case of Tian, who was also strict in enforcing discipline by reprimanding the accusers for taking too long to pray during work hours as the initial reports suggest.

It is pertinent to mention here that Tian is not the first Chinese national to be accused of blasphemy in Pakistan. In May 2013, a Chinese national, Lee Ping, who was working as an administration manager of a Chinese consortium building a major hydropower project in Azad Kashmir, was accused of throwing the Quran on the ground, prompting blasphemy charges against the manager. However, a police investigation later on cleared the Chinese worker of blasphemy charges and took action against 35 people who were involved in falsely accusing Lee Ping.

Moving beyond these high-profile cases, the abuse of the issue of blasphemy for settling personal feuds has also been highlighted by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the verdict of the famous Malik Muhammad Mumtaz Qadri v the State case in 2015. To quote exact words from the judgment, “The majority of blasphemy cases are based on false accusations stemming from property issues or other personal or family vendettas rather than genuine instances of blasphemy and they inevitably lead to mob violence against the entire community.”

The recent incarceration of a Chinese national under Pakistan’s blasphemy law, which carries the death penalty, could have far-reaching consequences for Pakistan’s economic life, which, metaphorically speaking, is already on a ventilator. The incident can further dent the relations between the two countries, which have been in flux for quite some time over growing attacks on Chinese nationals in Pakistan from nationalist and religious militant outfits operating in the country. It can also further spar already existing concerns among foreign investors and businesses operating in Pakistan, particularly those with ties to China making investments in Pakistan.

The bottom line is that at a time when Pakistan’s relations with the Western world are in flux, it cannot afford to estrange China, which is the only key source of foreign direct investment in the country at the moment. Thus, it is of utmost importance for the government of Pakistan to initiate an open dialogue with the key stakeholders to address the issue of reforming the country’s blasphemy laws. These laws have caused a significant level of sensitivity toward blasphemy in Pakistan, despite having no basis in Hanafi Islam. Furthermore, these laws have been exploited on numerous occasions to settle personal disputes as illustrated above. In light of these concerns, it is essential for the government to take proactive measures to address the issue of reform, with the best interest of the country in mind.

Also See: TTP: “Let’s Disturb China”

The article is originally published by thediplomat. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.

Azhar Zeeshan

Azhar Zeeshan is a researcher at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS) Lahore, Pakistan. He can be reached at info@casslhr.com

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »