Bollywood: India’s Propaganda Tool

Before the second world war, Adolf Hitler’s minister of propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, utilized the media to incite anti-Semitism. They produced movies based on anti-semitic propaganda, successfully radicalized the whole country, and got the public’s consent within Germany.

Similarly, the Indian Fascist regime is repeating the same course as Nazi Germany. Regarding establishing the topic, framing, and spreading false news, India is renowned as a counterfeit television factory. In the past, India has produced several films on the conflict in Kashmir. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is utilizing the media and the film industry as a piece of propaganda machinery to portray Muslim minorities as nasty and depraved.

Looking Back at Kashmir Files

There is a long list of movies in Bollywood, which are completely based on the anti-Muslim and anti-Christian narratives.

As far as the recent movie “Kashmir Files” is concerned, a Zee Studios Hindi-language film tells the narrative of Hindu Pandits’ flight during the conflict in Kashmir. The so-called “massacre” of Kashmiri Pandits (Hindus) and the subsequent deportation from the occupied Valley were the movie’s focus. New Delhi attempts to rewrite Kashmiri’s history based on falsehoods and deception to excuse its terrible acts are shown in this film. Meanwhile, the Muslims of Kashmir were depicted as the ones who ejected the Hindus from Kashmir, but the truth is very different.

From a historical point of view, it is tough to tell the story of why the Kashmiri Pandits left their homes. The way they left Kashmir is talked about is very politically charged and controversial. On the one hand, there are stories about how thousands left the Valley during the uprising in Indian-occupied Kashmir in 1989. Which suggests that their community was scared enough to leave their homes. On the other hand, the stories of Kashmiri Pandits who stayed in Kashmir contradict the claims of the diaspora who were of the view that the Kashmiri pandits were victims of “genocide” and were forced “into exile.” Understanding the situation of the Pandits, who are stuck between the Muslim majority in Kashmir and the objectives of the Indian state, is not convenient.

Media and the Hate Paradigm

Revivalism, which looked to a supposedly glorious and distant past, was the primary method of brainwashing used by Nazi Germany and others. To convince people in adverse situations that they, the majority, are the victims of the minority. Recent Hindi films deal with history, politics, religion, or a combination of these themes. Padmaavat, Manikarnika, The Queen of Jhansi, Samrat Prithviraj, Uri, and The Kashmir Files are a few instances of films that purport to be based on ‘historical events,’ although in most cases, the facts are manipulated or blended with fiction.

After screenings of the Kashmir Files in places worldwide, the filmmakers, notably Anupam Kher, deliver venomous monologues inspired by the film. However, the Prime Minister of India endorsed the film; the theaters were crowded, and the movie’s political issues are seldom addressed publicly.

Nevertheless, this normalization of hatred via movies did not occur overnight. Despite Agnihotri’s assertions that he has a monopoly on this kind of film, the number of Hindu nationalist movies laced with dog whistles has increased significantly since 2014. Moreover, one genre, in particular, Historical Drama, has achieved remarkable success. A few observers have also asserted Islamophobia in films like Padmaavat, Tanhaji, Kesari, and Panipat.

The BJP’s government and along with the Hindutva ideologues and their religious extremist leaders are following the footprints of Nazi Germany. They are leading India toward Fascism. In Modi’s India, the religious extremists and ultra-nationalists are using the media as a tool of propaganda to justify their unjustifiable atrocities and violence against Muslims and other minorities in India. When the BJP-led Modi administration in India begins utilizing Bollywood movies to target minorities, it will only serve the further split of the country.

Bollywood is currently serving the core interests of the extremists sitting in the mainstream. It is acting as a new propaganda ministry and a few directors like Agnihotri are serving as propaganda ministers for the Modi regime. The ruling party, BJP is sending the incorrect message throughout the world with complete exaggeration and lies, which will damage India’s reputation and ultimately lead to chaos in the Indian state. The film industry’s impasse can only be broken if the people of every state in India, understand their role, and step up to halt the process of social media, mainstream media, and society becoming divided. Only by safeguarding and granting the rights of minorities can result in achieving unity, peace, and stability.

The article is originally published by GVS. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.

Mehmood Ali

Mehmood Ali

Mehmood Ali, a research assistant at Balochistan Think Tank Network, is an award-winning young researcher specializing in South Asian Security Threat Matrix and Socioeconomic development. With a background in Security studies, he's well-versed in Militancy and Terrorism protocols. Ali previously served as a Research Fellow at South Asia Times and as a Research Intern at India Study Centre (ISSI). He can be contacted at X or @MEHMOODBALOCH75.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »