On October 23, 2024, terrorists attacked Turkish Aerospace Industries (TUSAS) near Ankara, killing five people and injuring another 22 in the tragic incident. Turkish security forces acted swiftly and neutralized two terrorists involved in the Ankara attack. They endangered their lives in protecting critical national infrastructure.
At first glance, the Ankara attack appears to be a simple act of terrorism. However, complex geopolitics are at play behind it. The incident occurred while President Erdogan met with Russian President Vladimir Putin during the BRICS summit. It appears to be a calculated move to disrupt Türkiye’s geopolitical efforts and sow instability in the region.
The Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) stands at the center of these efforts. It has long been associated with external support from Western and Israeli elements. Different Turkish officials have said that the nature of the attack hints at PKK as the main perpetrator.
Russian President Vladimir Putin meets with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on the sidelines of the BRICS summit in Kazan, Russia. [AP]
PKK’s Role and External Support
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has condemned the attack regarding it as a “heinous terrorist attack”. News sources tell that 15,000 people worked at the TUSAS campus at the time of the attack. Security camera footage showed a man with a backpack and assault rifle, along with a woman carrying a weapon.
Images of terrorists attacking the Turkish Aerospace Industries (TUSAS) near Ankara [X]
Turkish Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya suggested that the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK is likely linked to the attack. The PKK is a group that has led a decades-long insurgency against the Turkish government.
Similarly, Turkish Defense Minister Yasar Guler suggested that the PKK could be responsible for the attack. This aligns with the PKK’s history of orchestrating such violent incidents to destabilize the region and target critical infrastructure. Both officials pointed to the group’s militant tactics, reinforcing the likelihood that the PKK was behind this latest assault.
PKK’s alleged external support and backing from Israel and the West is part of broader efforts to weaken regional stability, challenge Turkish authority, and leverage the PKK as a proxy to achieve foreign policy objectives.
The incident also highlights a tactical similarity with the BLA, which involved a female terrorist. Both the BLA and PKK are regional proxies that utilize unconventional warfare methods, including female combatants, which enhance their operational reach and serve symbolic purposes.
The parallels between the PKK and other proxies like the BLA point to a broader trend in the use of insurgent groups by external powers to destabilize states like Türkiye and Pakistan. Both groups, though operating in different regions, are part of a larger network of non-state actors utilized to promote external agendas. The PKK, with its introduction of female suicide bombers, reflects an evolution in insurgent warfare, drawing inspiration from similar tactics seen in other conflict zones. The attack on critical infrastructure, like TUSAS, mirrors the BLA’s targeting of economic and strategic sites in Pakistan, further underscoring the similarities between these proxy groups.
Turkish Response and Future Implications
In response to the attack near Ankara, the Turkish defence ministry launched airstrikes on PKK targets in northern Iraq and Syria, according to state-run news agency Anadolu. The operation reportedly destroyed 32 terrorist sites, with a significant number of militants “neutralized.” As the complex geopolitics unfold, Turkey has to tactically advance its options for effective conflict management and securing strategic interests.
SAT Commentaries’ are social media threads by various authors, reproduced here for website use. Views are their own.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
Bollywood has become a powerful weapon in India’s information warfare, reshaping narratives on Pakistan, Kashmir, and Islam through propaganda-driven blockbusters. Under Modi’s BJP, cinema is being used to rewrite history, fuel nationalism, and normalize Islamophobia, raising serious concerns for regional peace and stability.
Pakistan is facing a new environmental reality where floods, glacier melts, and devastating cloudbursts are no longer rare but routine. Despite contributing less than 1% of global emissions, the country bears the brunt of climate change, with fragile infrastructure and limited resources leaving millions vulnerable to recurring disasters.
From the Arab Spring to Sri Lanka’s Aragalaya, street revolutions have ignited extraordinary hope, toppling entrenched rulers and inspiring global headlines. But history shows a harsher truth: these uprisings rarely deliver the transformation they promise. Once the euphoria fades, fractured coalitions give way to elite capture, military takeovers, or outright collapse. Without resilient institutions, the energy of the streets is easily co-opted, leaving ordinary citizens facing the same injustices under new faces.
In an interview with Al Jazeera, Pakistan’s Deputy PM Ishaq Dar declared the UN system broken and urged the Muslim world to move from words to action. He called for an Islamic security roadmap, highlighted Pakistan’s nuclear deterrence, and issued red lines on India and Afghanistan.
For two decades, Pakistan has endured TTP-led violence. Now, a rare consensus among Deobandi, Barelvi, and Ahl-e-Hadith scholars delegitimizes the insurgency and redefines jihad versus rebellion.
Ankara Attack: More Than Just Terrorism?
On October 23, 2024, terrorists attacked Turkish Aerospace Industries (TUSAS) near Ankara, killing five people and injuring another 22 in the tragic incident. Turkish security forces acted swiftly and neutralized two terrorists involved in the Ankara attack. They endangered their lives in protecting critical national infrastructure.
At first glance, the Ankara attack appears to be a simple act of terrorism. However, complex geopolitics are at play behind it. The incident occurred while President Erdogan met with Russian President Vladimir Putin during the BRICS summit. It appears to be a calculated move to disrupt Türkiye’s geopolitical efforts and sow instability in the region.
The Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) stands at the center of these efforts. It has long been associated with external support from Western and Israeli elements. Different Turkish officials have said that the nature of the attack hints at PKK as the main perpetrator.
PKK’s Role and External Support
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has condemned the attack regarding it as a “heinous terrorist attack”. News sources tell that 15,000 people worked at the TUSAS campus at the time of the attack. Security camera footage showed a man with a backpack and assault rifle, along with a woman carrying a weapon.
Turkish Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya suggested that the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK is likely linked to the attack. The PKK is a group that has led a decades-long insurgency against the Turkish government.
Similarly, Turkish Defense Minister Yasar Guler suggested that the PKK could be responsible for the attack. This aligns with the PKK’s history of orchestrating such violent incidents to destabilize the region and target critical infrastructure. Both officials pointed to the group’s militant tactics, reinforcing the likelihood that the PKK was behind this latest assault.
PKK’s alleged external support and backing from Israel and the West is part of broader efforts to weaken regional stability, challenge Turkish authority, and leverage the PKK as a proxy to achieve foreign policy objectives.
The incident also highlights a tactical similarity with the BLA, which involved a female terrorist. Both the BLA and PKK are regional proxies that utilize unconventional warfare methods, including female combatants, which enhance their operational reach and serve symbolic purposes.
Also See: Terrorism: Bleeding Wound for Regional Connectivity
Connection to Other Regional Proxies
The parallels between the PKK and other proxies like the BLA point to a broader trend in the use of insurgent groups by external powers to destabilize states like Türkiye and Pakistan. Both groups, though operating in different regions, are part of a larger network of non-state actors utilized to promote external agendas. The PKK, with its introduction of female suicide bombers, reflects an evolution in insurgent warfare, drawing inspiration from similar tactics seen in other conflict zones. The attack on critical infrastructure, like TUSAS, mirrors the BLA’s targeting of economic and strategic sites in Pakistan, further underscoring the similarities between these proxy groups.
Turkish Response and Future Implications
In response to the attack near Ankara, the Turkish defence ministry launched airstrikes on PKK targets in northern Iraq and Syria, according to state-run news agency Anadolu. The operation reportedly destroyed 32 terrorist sites, with a significant number of militants “neutralized.” As the complex geopolitics unfold, Turkey has to tactically advance its options for effective conflict management and securing strategic interests.
SAT Commentaries’ are social media threads by various authors, reproduced here for website use. Views are their own.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
Recent
Framing the Enemy: Modi, Bollywood and the Battle of Narratives
Bollywood has become a powerful weapon in India’s information warfare, reshaping narratives on Pakistan, Kashmir, and Islam through propaganda-driven blockbusters. Under Modi’s BJP, cinema is being used to rewrite history, fuel nationalism, and normalize Islamophobia, raising serious concerns for regional peace and stability.
Cloud Burst and Calamities: Exploring Pakistan’s New Environmental Reality
Pakistan is facing a new environmental reality where floods, glacier melts, and devastating cloudbursts are no longer rare but routine. Despite contributing less than 1% of global emissions, the country bears the brunt of climate change, with fragile infrastructure and limited resources leaving millions vulnerable to recurring disasters.
The Illusion of the Street: Why Uprisings Rarely Deliver Real Change
From the Arab Spring to Sri Lanka’s Aragalaya, street revolutions have ignited extraordinary hope, toppling entrenched rulers and inspiring global headlines. But history shows a harsher truth: these uprisings rarely deliver the transformation they promise. Once the euphoria fades, fractured coalitions give way to elite capture, military takeovers, or outright collapse. Without resilient institutions, the energy of the streets is easily co-opted, leaving ordinary citizens facing the same injustices under new faces.
Multilateralism in Crisis: Pakistan’s Call for Collective Islamic Security
In an interview with Al Jazeera, Pakistan’s Deputy PM Ishaq Dar declared the UN system broken and urged the Muslim world to move from words to action. He called for an Islamic security roadmap, highlighted Pakistan’s nuclear deterrence, and issued red lines on India and Afghanistan.
The Unholy War: Religious Consensus Against Insurgency in Pakistan
For two decades, Pakistan has endured TTP-led violence. Now, a rare consensus among Deobandi, Barelvi, and Ahl-e-Hadith scholars delegitimizes the insurgency and redefines jihad versus rebellion.