Alarms on Taliban Conquering Kabul are Exaggerated: Mr. Khalilzad

US Special Rep. Zalmay Khalilzad told House Foreign Affairs Committee: Predicting Taliban takeover post troop withdrawal overly pessimistic.

As America has begun to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan after twenty years of its engagement, U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan Mr Zalmay Khalilzad said to the House Foreign Affairs Committee; that the prediction that the Taliban will overrun Afghanistan’s forces and conquer Kabul after the complete withdrawal of international troops, is based overly on pessimism.

In addition, Khalilzad mentioned, ‘I believe that statements of the disintegration of their forces and the Taliban’s short-term takeover are erroneous.’

Moreover, Mr Khalilzad said that the government of Afghanistan and the Taliban should play their role in the Peace Process. He emphasized Pakistan’s active role in Afghanistan’s peace efforts.

According to the Associated Press, Mr Khalilzad informed the  House Foreign Affairs Committee that; ‘We continue to keep in close contact with Pakistani leaders to make a substantial effort to minimize violence. We will utilize Pakistan’s influence over the Taliban. In addition, I think, a prolonged war in Afghanistan is not in the interest of Pakistan.’

Reportedly, the Defense Ministry of Afghanistan informed that after a three-day truce, violence remained high in the country between 12th and 15th May.

Concerns of U.S Legislators About Post-US Withdrawal Afghanistan Future

However, the US legislators have expressed concerns about the country’s future when US troops will leave Afghanistan.

‘It seems very certain that after our withdrawal the Taliban will try to overthrow the country. The Taliban will restore it to a state before 11-September,’ Michael McCaul, a Texas Republican.

Since President Biden’s announcement was made, they (Taliban) beefed up their attacks and have taken over new land and bases. Without a military presence, the US allows them space to deepen their ties with terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda, which could again attempt to launch external attacks against us and our country’s allies. Mr McCaul added.

Rep. Ami Bera considers it an obligation to protect friends in Afghanistan who bravely fought in battle beside the US forces.

Lastly, speculations concerning the Taliban’s dealing with the minorities and women in Afghanistan after the withdrawal of the US forces are there. However, it is important to note that, over the years Taliban have also transformed. They are relatively flexible in their state of affairs as compared to their demeanor in the 1990s.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Afghanistan’s Trade Boycott: Strategic Miscalculation With Fiscal Consequences

Afghanistan’s Trade Boycott: Strategic Miscalculation With Fiscal Consequences

Afghanistan’s 2025 trade boycott of Pakistan exposes a strategic miscalculation. Despite efforts to shift toward Iran and Central Asia, Kabul remains structurally dependent on Pakistan’s mature trade corridors, customs revenue, labour mobility, and logistical efficiency. Alternative routes carry higher costs, sanctions risks, and operational delays, leaving the Taliban with mounting fiscal losses and regional constraints.

Read More »
The Defund Taliban Campaign

The Defund Taliban Campaign

The Defund Taliban Campaign examines how indirect US funding and a $7 billion abandoned arsenal have turned the Taliban into a regional force multiplier for militant groups.

Read More »
The Taliban’s new fatwa banning foreign militancy signals a shift in doctrine, but rising regional attacks and ideological fractures raise questions about its enforceability.

Doctrine vs Reality: Can the Taliban Enforce Their Ban on Foreign Militants?

The Taliban’s new fatwa banning foreign militants has been hailed by officials in Kabul as a decisive theological shift. But rising attacks in the north, continued TTP operations, and mounting pressure from Washington expose a widening gap between doctrine and reality. As regional powers demand proof of enforcement, the decree risks becoming another symbolic gesture unless it translates into measurable action on the ground.

Read More »
Deconstructing the Pakistan-Afghanistan Economic Crisis

Deconstructing the Pakistan-Afghanistan Economic Crisis

The Pakistan-Afghanistan trade freeze is widely framed as a punitive economic move, yet its roots lie in a severe security breakdown emanating from Afghan territory. Pakistan’s transit closures are reactive, not aggressive, and Afghanistan’s deep logistical dependence on Pakistani routes exposes the crisis as geopolitical, not commercial.

Read More »
Criminalising Dissent: How New Laws and “Public Order” Politics Are Shrinking Democratic Space in India

Criminalising Dissent: How New Laws and “Public Order” Politics Are Shrinking Democratic Space in India

India is witnessing a steady erosion of democratic freedoms as broad security laws, digital surveillance, and administrative restrictions redefine dissent as a threat rather than a constitutional right. From expanded use of UAPA and IT Rules to routine protest crackdowns and shrinking academic space, the cumulative impact is a quieter and increasingly constrained civic sphere.

Read More »