September 6th: The Battle Within

September 6th, a day for introspection! [Image via SAT Creatives]

As I sit here on September 6th, observing Pakistan’s Defense Day 2023, it’s not just an occasion to reminisce and celebrate our nation’s resilience. It’s also an opportune time for introspection, a chance to acknowledge that while external threats are a tangible reality, the gravest danger often simmers within our borders. Our understanding of national defense has evolved over the years, shifting from conventional warfare with guns and bullets to a multifaceted battle for the hearts and minds of our people.

The gravest danger often simmers within our borders

Pakistan, a nation founded on profound ideological principles, hinges on national unity as the linchpin of its security. Throughout our storied history, our rich ethno-cultural and ethno-religious diversity has been exploited by both internal and external forces. From nationalist movements dating back to 1954 to the ethno-religious tensions that emerged in the 1970s, we’ve navigated a complex web of internal challenges. Economic disparities, political instability, and the looming specter of climate insecurity have all contributed to this volatile mix.

Amidst these multifaceted challenges, the role of economic revival stands as a keystone for resilience against internal implosion. A robust economy not only enhances the standard of living for citizens but also reduces the susceptibility of vulnerable populations to radicalization and extremist ideologies. It provides a sense of hope and opportunity, which is vital in countering the allure of extremist narratives that often thrive in environments of economic despair.

Although, in moments of crisis, such as the September 6th, 1965 war, the devastating Kashmir earthquake of 2005, or the catastrophic floods of 2010, we’ve witnessed the admirable unity of our people. We’ve come together to confront even the most daunting challenges. However, once the immediate crisis subsides, the underlying internal divisions resurface, threatening the very core of our nation’s stability.

The contemporary landscape of warfare has transformed dramatically, transitioning from conventional battlefields to encompass ideological, psychological, and emotional spheres.

Historically, institutions like Pakistan’s National Cadet Corps (NCC) and Civil Defense played pivotal roles in grooming and training our youth for national defense. Sadly, the dissolution of the NCC in 2002 created a void, leaving us without an entity to guide and prepare our youth for the intricate challenges of the 21st century.

In tandem with this, the proliferation of private militias has contributed to the rise of gun culture, while within a society marked by inflation, political turmoil, and deep-seated ethnic and religious fault lines, criminal activities and civil unrest have become all too common. Fear has been weaponized as a political tool.

The advent of social media has further complicated matters. It has rendered our younger generation more susceptible to manipulation. Recent attempts on social media to undermine Pakistani identity and sow discord by exploiting regional subnationalism are deeply concerning. It’s imperative that we engage our youth, a significant demographic, channeling their energies toward preserving our shared national identity, ‘Pakistaniat.’

The recent youth movements, such as those that emerged following the dismissal of the Imran Khan government, demonstrate their potential for mobilization. However, their energy must be channeled in the right direction. We’ve seen in the past, during the War on Terror, how groups like Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) gained traction among disenchanted youth.

In this challenging landscape, we must heed the wisdom of ‘A’idh bin ‘Amro al-Muzani (RAA), who narrated The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ)’s words: “اَلْإِسْلَامِ يَعْلُو, وَلَا يُعْلَى” – “Islam is always superior and should never be surpassed.” We have a sacred duty to safeguard our nation’s identity and ideals, particularly when ‘Pakistaniat’ is under threat from external elements exploiting religious and ideological fault lines.

See Also: Pakistan: The Flip Side

In this context, the role of the Ullema becomes even more significant, especially with ideologies like Takfiriat infiltrating our society through groups like Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISK-P). Defense in the 21st century demands not only military strength but also the fortification of our national unity, economic resilience, and identity against internal divisions. Unchecked, these divisions could become a potent tool for adversaries seeking to undermine Pakistan’s defense and sovereignty. As we commemorate September 6th, Defense Day, let’s remember that true defense begins from within, with our unity, shared purpose, and a strong and resilient economy acting as pillars of our national strength.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own. They do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.

Haleema Khalid

Haleema Khalid

Haleema Khalid is an Editor and Research Lead at South Asia Times. She holds a Master's degree in Applied Linguistics and a Bachelor's in Social Work. Her research interests include exploring language's impact on society and culture.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »