When states interact, there is always two-way traffic. Going through some ground facts before jumping to conclusions is a means that we as Pakistanis do not usually pursue. Acquainting ourselves with ground realities is more important than jumping on bandwagons.
In Pakistan, there exists a mentality of taking things out of context. Moreover, we enjoy making a mockery of ourselves while presenting half baked analysis. It is pertinent to remember that Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are not two different cases when it comes down to statecraft, IR and prevailing geopolitical scenarios.
Pakistan and Saudi Arabia Defence Servicemen
It was never and will never be one-way traffic. An incorrect observation made by some of our analysts. Political point-scoring is on the rise by many. Similarly, imagine if Pakistan’s defence shield is no more in KSA – What will happen? However, before we discuss that, there are some preliminary issues that we must first delve into.
Pakistan’s defence shield comprises of servicemen (figures not confirmed) serving in Saudi Military. Furthermore, they are deployed on all fronts of external/internal threats. Out of them, as per a senate briefing, 1,671 were serving officers of Pak Armed forces.
Pakistan Army
Meanwhile, General (R) Raheel Sharif is leading an alliance we all are aware of. It is one of KSA\’s biggest military investments. In an attempt to safeguard its interests in the name of fighting against terrorism.
Additionally, KSA is the largest importer of Pakistan’s defence products. Pakistan secured an 81M $ contract in 2018 from KSA only.
Similarly, there are a number of other contracts and protocols in place. The most famous of which is the protocol of 1982. There are other bilateral agreements as well. Through which KSA “exports” military personals, advisers and defence equipment to Pakistan.
China’s Involvement
Moreover, let us connect the aforementioned with Pakistan’s strategic partner – China. BRI\’s flagship project is CPEC. Interestingly enough, KSA is going to host a mega event “Arab- China Summit“. Which is the background of Chinese investment in KSA through BRI.
Likewise, out of China’s top 15 oil providers, the first nine belong to the middle east. Where KSA tops the list in all of them. With a 40.1B US $ export of oil to China (This is a 2019 figure). This was 16.8% of total imports of oil into China.
Food for Thought
Now consider this, states don’t just make rash decisions. They analyze, see the fault lines and play around it. KSA’s total defence mechanism’s 80% is directed towards the threats originating from Iran or Turkey and their proxies. There is no denying this fact.
However, the protocols signed with Pakistan are mainly to avert and defend KSA from these threats. Along with threats originating from Israel-Jordanian-Saudi Border. Pakistan’s troops remain a part of Combat brigade on this side of the Kingdom as well.
Pakistan and Saudi Arabia Ties and the Demon of Terrorism
The immediate threat that KSA fears may resurface is the internal implosion due to a weakening economy in the wake of a decline in oil prices and Covid-19. However, there is a hard learnt lesson from history which haunts KSA. We faced that demon in Pak as well. The demon of Terrorism.
Well before 911, when OBL launched World Islamic Front aka Al Qaida, he criticized KSA for bringing down the US boots on grounds. He criticized Royals of KSA & asked them to drive the Jews and Christians out of Arabian Peninsula.
The Spread of Terrorism
This resulted in a call for war veterans from the Afghan Jihad era. Those who were inspired by the ideology of WIF. The literature of Ikhwan (which was prevalent in WIF or AQ) and its offshoots served the purpose for these elements (See the Shur’a council name of WIF)
Similarly, then we saw a rise in the attacks inside KSA, bombings and Suicide attacks both. Target killings included. The most prominent one was the Khobar Tower Bombings – Post 911, we in Pakistan witnessed and experienced it on another level altogether.
Ideological Terrorism
These WIF or commonly known as Al Qaida elements were heavily inspired by the literature and ideology of Ikhwan’s offshoots – A political ideology turned violent regime, which wreaked havoc in Egypt, Algeria, Sudan and later on in KSA and in the end in Pakistan.
KSA certainly won’t want these elements to rise again and that too at its weakest point in recent history. If Pakistan defence mechanism & advisory may be pulled out, who among the Muslim countries will be able to replace Pakistani servicemen & experience?
Also, what impact will it have on Saudis and Chinese relations? When the Chinese flagship project is associated with Pak? KSA vs Ikhwans’s ideology and its offshoots in the form of Iran, Turks and their proxies is a fault line and fear of Saudis which was exploited earlier by the US.
Conclusion
Therefore, I hope I won’t be bragging when I state this: Turks and Iranians are very much aware of this fault-line and the only thing standing between an onslaught from outside and implosion from inside of KSA is defence mechanism advised and placed by Pakistan.
What if this defence shield becomes indifferent to the Middle Eastern theatre? (which is of course not in favour of any stakeholder) and the Saudis very well know how to keep Pakistan on their side, at least for now.
If anyone has any ambiguity about this pls read the article published by Arab News, authored by former KSA Ambassador to Pakistan, Dr Ali Awadh Al Asseri. You will get a true picture.
Hence, before mocking Pakistan one should always get hold of some background before jumping the gun.
A Critical Analysis of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia Relations
When states interact, there is always two-way traffic. Going through some ground facts before jumping to conclusions is a means that we as Pakistanis do not usually pursue. Acquainting ourselves with ground realities is more important than jumping on bandwagons.
In Pakistan, there exists a mentality of taking things out of context. Moreover, we enjoy making a mockery of ourselves while presenting half baked analysis. It is pertinent to remember that Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are not two different cases when it comes down to statecraft, IR and prevailing geopolitical scenarios.
Pakistan and Saudi Arabia Defence Servicemen
It was never and will never be one-way traffic. An incorrect observation made by some of our analysts. Political point-scoring is on the rise by many. Similarly, imagine if Pakistan’s defence shield is no more in KSA – What will happen? However, before we discuss that, there are some preliminary issues that we must first delve into.
Pakistan’s defence shield comprises of servicemen (figures not confirmed) serving in Saudi Military. Furthermore, they are deployed on all fronts of external/internal threats. Out of them, as per a senate briefing, 1,671 were serving officers of Pak Armed forces.
Pakistan Army
Meanwhile, General (R) Raheel Sharif is leading an alliance we all are aware of. It is one of KSA\’s biggest military investments. In an attempt to safeguard its interests in the name of fighting against terrorism.
Additionally, KSA is the largest importer of Pakistan’s defence products. Pakistan secured an 81M $ contract in 2018 from KSA only.
Similarly, there are a number of other contracts and protocols in place. The most famous of which is the protocol of 1982. There are other bilateral agreements as well. Through which KSA “exports” military personals, advisers and defence equipment to Pakistan.
China’s Involvement
Moreover, let us connect the aforementioned with Pakistan’s strategic partner – China. BRI\’s flagship project is CPEC. Interestingly enough, KSA is going to host a mega event “Arab- China Summit“. Which is the background of Chinese investment in KSA through BRI.
Likewise, out of China’s top 15 oil providers, the first nine belong to the middle east. Where KSA tops the list in all of them. With a 40.1B US $ export of oil to China (This is a 2019 figure). This was 16.8% of total imports of oil into China.
Food for Thought
Now consider this, states don’t just make rash decisions. They analyze, see the fault lines and play around it. KSA’s total defence mechanism’s 80% is directed towards the threats originating from Iran or Turkey and their proxies. There is no denying this fact.
However, the protocols signed with Pakistan are mainly to avert and defend KSA from these threats. Along with threats originating from Israel-Jordanian-Saudi Border. Pakistan’s troops remain a part of Combat brigade on this side of the Kingdom as well.
Pakistan and Saudi Arabia Ties and the Demon of Terrorism
The immediate threat that KSA fears may resurface is the internal implosion due to a weakening economy in the wake of a decline in oil prices and Covid-19. However, there is a hard learnt lesson from history which haunts KSA. We faced that demon in Pak as well. The demon of Terrorism.
Well before 911, when OBL launched World Islamic Front aka Al Qaida, he criticized KSA for bringing down the US boots on grounds. He criticized Royals of KSA & asked them to drive the Jews and Christians out of Arabian Peninsula.
The Spread of Terrorism
This resulted in a call for war veterans from the Afghan Jihad era. Those who were inspired by the ideology of WIF. The literature of Ikhwan (which was prevalent in WIF or AQ) and its offshoots served the purpose for these elements (See the Shur’a council name of WIF)
Similarly, then we saw a rise in the attacks inside KSA, bombings and Suicide attacks both. Target killings included. The most prominent one was the Khobar Tower Bombings – Post 911, we in Pakistan witnessed and experienced it on another level altogether.
Ideological Terrorism
These WIF or commonly known as Al Qaida elements were heavily inspired by the literature and ideology of Ikhwan’s offshoots – A political ideology turned violent regime, which wreaked havoc in Egypt, Algeria, Sudan and later on in KSA and in the end in Pakistan.
KSA certainly won’t want these elements to rise again and that too at its weakest point in recent history. If Pakistan defence mechanism & advisory may be pulled out, who among the Muslim countries will be able to replace Pakistani servicemen & experience?
Also, what impact will it have on Saudis and Chinese relations? When the Chinese flagship project is associated with Pak? KSA vs Ikhwans’s ideology and its offshoots in the form of Iran, Turks and their proxies is a fault line and fear of Saudis which was exploited earlier by the US.
Conclusion
Therefore, I hope I won’t be bragging when I state this: Turks and Iranians are very much aware of this fault-line and the only thing standing between an onslaught from outside and implosion from inside of KSA is defence mechanism advised and placed by Pakistan.
What if this defence shield becomes indifferent to the Middle Eastern theatre? (which is of course not in favour of any stakeholder) and the Saudis very well know how to keep Pakistan on their side, at least for now.
If anyone has any ambiguity about this pls read the article published by Arab News, authored by former KSA Ambassador to Pakistan, Dr Ali Awadh Al Asseri. You will get a true picture.
Hence, before mocking Pakistan one should always get hold of some background before jumping the gun.
Salman Javed
Salman Javed
The author is Director General at South Asia Times.
Recent
Herat Border Tragedy: The Deadly Consequences of Afghanistan’s Governance Failures
The Herat border tragedy, is a stark illustration of the human cost of Afghanistan’s governance failures. With limited economic opportunities, widespread poverty, and insufficient social support, families are forced to undertake life-threatening journeys across freezing mountains. The incident underscores the urgent need for the Afghan government to provide stable livelihoods, establish safe migration routes, and strengthen healthcare and social services, as humanitarian risks continue to escalate across the country.
Debunking the Gaza Deployment Narrative
False claims of a Pakistani troop deployment to Gaza, amplified by disinformation networks, were firmly rejected by the Foreign Office, reaffirming that Pakistan’s military operates only under UN mandates and constitutional limits.
The End of the 1971 Consensus
Sharif Osman Hadi’s death has become the symbolic burial of the 1971 Consensus that long structured India–Bangladesh relations. For a generation with no lived memory of the Liberation War, Hadi embodies a Second Independence, reframing 1971 as the start of Indian dominance rather than true sovereignty. His killing has accelerated Bangladesh’s rupture with India and exposed a deep strategic crisis across South Asia.
Afghan Taliban’s Biopolitics
The Taliban’s health diplomacy is reshaping Afghanistan’s geopolitical landscape. By phasing out Pakistani pharmaceuticals and inviting Indian partnerships, Kabul securitizes its healthcare infrastructure as a tool of strategic realignment. The shift highlights the intersection of sovereignty, economic statecraft, and regional influence, with Afghan patients bearing the immediate consequences.
Who Benefits from Islamophobia?
In the wake of global violence, political actors often replace evidence-based analysis with collective blame. Islamophobia, when elevated from fringe rhetoric to state discourse, fractures society and weakens security.