India’s Withdrawal of Transshipment Facility Impacts Bangladesh Exports

India ends transshipment facility for Bangladesh exports via land borders, citing congestion and trade disruptions. [Image via Bangla Tribune]

India has decided to discontinue the transshipment facility for Bangladesh’s export cargo to third countries—such as Bhutan, Nepal, and Myanmar—via its land borders.

In a recent notification issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) on Tuesday, the Indian government announced the immediate cancellation of a previous circular dated June 29, 2020.

That circular had permitted export goods from Bangladesh to be transported to third countries through Indian Land Customs Stations (LCSs) to ports or airports, using containers or sealed trucks.

A statement from India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) confirmed the withdrawal of the transshipment facility, citing the growing congestion at Indian airports and ports. “The transshipment facility extended to Bangladesh had over a period of time resulted in significant congestion at our airports and ports. Logistical delays and higher costs were hindering our own exports and creating backlogs. The facility, therefore, has been withdrawn with effect from April 8, 2025. To clarify, these measures do not impact Bangladesh exports to Nepal or Bhutan transiting through Indian territory.”

This policy reversal is likely to affect the flow of Bangladesh’s ready-made garment exports through Indian gateways, especially at Indira Gandhi International Airport in New Delhi, which handles a substantial volume of such shipments.

The suspension is expected to hinder Bangladesh’s trade logistics, particularly with neighboring nations like Bhutan, Nepal, and Myanmar, which depend heavily on Indian transport infrastructure for international commerce. The earlier arrangement had been beneficial in reducing both delivery time and shipping costs.

Also See: India, Cyber Espionage, and Political Influence: What Canada’s Report Unveils

The Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC) of India had been lobbying for the removal of this facility. Since India and Bangladesh are direct rivals in textile exports, eliminating the facility is seen as a step to ease congestion at Indian airports and support domestic exporters, according to AEPC Chairman Sudhir Sekhri.

Ajay Srivastava, founder of the New Delhi-based Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), warned that this decision could bring India’s WTO obligations into question. He highlighted that the WTO’s rules require member countries to guarantee free and uninterrupted transit of goods to and from landlocked nations.

According to Srivastava, Article V of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 ensures such transit rights, prohibiting unnecessary restrictions, delays, or transit-related charges.

India’s apparel exports saw a 3.46% decline year-on-year in January, adding pressure on the sector. Currently, around 20–30 truckloads of Bangladeshi goods enter the air cargo terminal at Delhi’s international airport daily, contributing to overcrowding.

Sekhri also mentioned that disruptions in maritime routes—due to the Red Sea crisis and piracy threats—have prompted exporters to switch from sea to air, further inflating logistics expenses.

This news is sourced from Dhaka Tribune and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A History of Failed Israeli-Palestinian Peace Negotiations

Since the 1973 Yom Kippur War, numerous US, Arab, and international peace plans have sought to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, yet none have succeeded. A consistent pattern has seen these efforts fail in the face of core disagreements over Palestinian sovereignty, Israeli security, and the ongoing expansion of Israeli settlements. This backgrounder explains the historical context of the conflict, the major peace initiatives since 1973, why they failed, and the primary obstacles that remain.

Read More »
A Strategic Checkmate: The Defense Pact Reshaping the International Relations

A Strategic Checkmate: The Defense Pact Reshaping the International Relations

The 2025 strategic defense pact between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia marks a major diplomatic milestone. Strengthening military and economic ties, it enhances Pakistan’s regional influence, bolsters Gulf security, and positions Islamabad as a key player between China, the US, and the Middle East. The agreement reflects a blend of constructivist and realist strategies, reinforcing Pakistan’s leadership role in the Muslim world.

Read More »
Anatomy of a Diplomatic Failure: The 20-Point Gaza Plan

Anatomy of a Diplomatic Failure: The 20-Point Gaza Plan

A 20-point Gaza peace plan, initially hailed by a coalition of eight Muslim-majority nations, represented a rare moment of consensus in Middle East diplomacy. But this optimism was short-lived. Following a pivotal meeting between US and Israeli leaders, the plan was radically altered, transforming a multilateral framework into a security-centric arrangement that alienated its initial backers and triggered a crisis of trust. This is the story of how a potential breakthrough unraveled into a diplomatic failure.

Read More »
Nepal’s Counter-Revolt: Challenge for the Communist and the Left in South Asia

Nepal’s Counter-Revolt: Challenge for the Communist and the Left in South Asia

Nepal’s counter-revolt exposes decades of political betrayal by mainstream and leftist parties alike. Despite revolutionary promises to abolish feudalism, ensure sovereignty, and deliver land reforms, leaders from Congress to Maoists succumbed to corruption and power politics. Today’s uprising is both a rejection of failed communist leadership and a warning for the Left in South Asia.

Read More »