A new report by the India Hate Lab (IHL), a Washington, D.C.-based research initiative under the Center for the Study of Organized Hate (CSOH), has documented an alarming rise in hate speech in India, exposing what it calls a systematic and state-backed campaign of bigotry.
The findings paint a grim picture of India’s political and social landscape, with hate speech not only increasing but also being openly endorsed by members of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The report highlights a 74.4% increase in hate speech, with BJP politicians responsible for nearly 40% of recorded cases.
Hate as a Political Strategy
According to the report, BJP politicians delivered 452 hate speeches, making hate speech a central pillar of political discourse. This trend was particularly evident during election periods, with 373 hate speeches recorded during campaigns, indicating a deliberate strategy of using communal divisions for electoral gain.
The report further reveals that 79.9% of hate incidents occurred in BJP-ruled states, raising concerns over state-sponsored bigotry becoming a key governance model. Hate speech was frequently directed at religious minorities, with 1,147 speeches targeting Muslims and 115 directed at Christians.
Also See: 23 Years Since the Gujarat Riots: A Tragic Chapter in India’s Communal History
Growing Radicalization and Call for Violence
The IHL report also highlights a dangerous rise in violent rhetoric, with 259 speeches openly inciting violence and 123 calling for arms. Additionally, 274 speeches targeted mosques, churches, and minority communities, with many urging economic and social boycotts.
Extremist Hindu nationalist groups, including the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) and Bajrang Dal, reportedly held 279 hate rallies, a 29.2% increase from previous years. The report suggests that these rallies were often held with state support or police inaction, reinforcing concerns of an institutionalized hate network.
Silence from Authorities and Judiciary
Despite the scale of hate speech and its link to real-world violence, the IHL report notes a lack of legal action. The Election Commission of India failed to take any action against hate speech during elections, while petitions against inflammatory rhetoric were dismissed by the Supreme Court.
Legal protections for minorities are also being systematically dismantled, the report warns, allowing Hindu extremist groups to operate with impunity.
Global Implications
Beyond India’s borders, the report warns of a growing export of Hindu nationalist radicalism, with Indian diaspora communities witnessing an uptick in extremist activity. Online disinformation campaigns—with 995 hate videos circulated—are also playing a key role in amplifying communal divisions globally.
International Inaction Worsening the Crisis
The report criticizes the silence of global institutions and governments, stating that the failure to hold India accountable has emboldened hate networks. It warns that if left unchecked, India’s descent into radicalization will not remain confined within its borders.
With hate speech becoming an institutionalized tool of governance, the report calls for urgent international intervention to prevent further escalation.
SAT Commentaries’ are social media threads by various authors, reproduced here for website use. Views are their own.
India’s Hate Speech Crisis: IHL Report Exposes Alarming Trends
A new report by the India Hate Lab (IHL), a Washington, D.C.-based research initiative under the Center for the Study of Organized Hate (CSOH), has documented an alarming rise in hate speech in India, exposing what it calls a systematic and state-backed campaign of bigotry.
The findings paint a grim picture of India’s political and social landscape, with hate speech not only increasing but also being openly endorsed by members of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The report highlights a 74.4% increase in hate speech, with BJP politicians responsible for nearly 40% of recorded cases.
Hate as a Political Strategy
According to the report, BJP politicians delivered 452 hate speeches, making hate speech a central pillar of political discourse. This trend was particularly evident during election periods, with 373 hate speeches recorded during campaigns, indicating a deliberate strategy of using communal divisions for electoral gain.
The report further reveals that 79.9% of hate incidents occurred in BJP-ruled states, raising concerns over state-sponsored bigotry becoming a key governance model. Hate speech was frequently directed at religious minorities, with 1,147 speeches targeting Muslims and 115 directed at Christians.
Also See: 23 Years Since the Gujarat Riots: A Tragic Chapter in India’s Communal History
Growing Radicalization and Call for Violence
The IHL report also highlights a dangerous rise in violent rhetoric, with 259 speeches openly inciting violence and 123 calling for arms. Additionally, 274 speeches targeted mosques, churches, and minority communities, with many urging economic and social boycotts.
Extremist Hindu nationalist groups, including the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) and Bajrang Dal, reportedly held 279 hate rallies, a 29.2% increase from previous years. The report suggests that these rallies were often held with state support or police inaction, reinforcing concerns of an institutionalized hate network.
Silence from Authorities and Judiciary
Despite the scale of hate speech and its link to real-world violence, the IHL report notes a lack of legal action. The Election Commission of India failed to take any action against hate speech during elections, while petitions against inflammatory rhetoric were dismissed by the Supreme Court.
Legal protections for minorities are also being systematically dismantled, the report warns, allowing Hindu extremist groups to operate with impunity.
Global Implications
Beyond India’s borders, the report warns of a growing export of Hindu nationalist radicalism, with Indian diaspora communities witnessing an uptick in extremist activity. Online disinformation campaigns—with 995 hate videos circulated—are also playing a key role in amplifying communal divisions globally.
International Inaction Worsening the Crisis
The report criticizes the silence of global institutions and governments, stating that the failure to hold India accountable has emboldened hate networks. It warns that if left unchecked, India’s descent into radicalization will not remain confined within its borders.
With hate speech becoming an institutionalized tool of governance, the report calls for urgent international intervention to prevent further escalation.
SAT Commentaries’ are social media threads by various authors, reproduced here for website use. Views are their own.
News Desk
News Desk
Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.
Recent
Civil–Military Relations in Transition: Continuity, Change, and Strategic Stability in Pakistan
Civil–Military Relations in Transition: Continuity, Change, and Strategic Stability in Pakistan Janurary 10, 2026 Online SAT Web Administrator Share 10 Janurary 2025 Wednesday Roundtable Event
How Sanctions, Militarized Economics, and Institutional Decay Broke Iran’s Currency
Iran’s 2026 currency crash was not a sudden shock but the result of sanctions, IRGC-dominated economics, and institutional decay undermining trust in the rial.
Bagram Airbase, US Aid, and Afghanistan’s Strategic-Humanitarian Dilemma
Sources suggest the Taliban has offered immediate access to Bagram Airbase for potential strikes against Iran in exchange for continued U.S. aid. Beyond military leverage, the offer underscores Afghanistan’s acute humanitarian crisis and the Taliban’s reliance on external support, highlighting the complex interplay between strategy, politics, and survival in a fragile state.
Assessing the Escalation of Anti-Taliban Resistance in Afghanistan
Recent operations by NRF and AFF target Taliban bases and urban centers, signaling a growing insurgency and weakening regime control.
Is Social Media Neutral?
Social media platforms are not neutral arenas of free expression. Powered by opaque algorithms and AI-driven amplification, they increasingly shape political narratives and public perception, prompting non-Western states to frame platform regulation not as censorship, but as a question of digital and cognitive sovereignty.