“Fintech” Set To Change the Financial System via Innovation and Mutual Cooperation

IMF World Economic Outlook on ASEAN

According to the IMF World Economic Outlook, GDP will go down by 6 percent for 5 of ASEAN countries. These countries include Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, and Vietnam. For 2020, the Gross Domestic growth for ASEAN countries is projected to increase by 1% only, it says. Moreover, Micro-small and medium enterprises are driving factors for GDP growth in the south Asian region. Between 52% to 97% of the jobs are created pertinent to MSMEs. The phenomena have thrived predominately for the past decade.

COVID 19 Stimulus Packages

Alternatively, COVID-19 implies that enterprises providing essential services and products stand a chance against the pandemic. ASEAN countries, under the stimulus package, have injected 6% of their GDP into the economy. The package mainly targets health, SME aid, cash transfers, tax breaks, and financial loans.

Despite the stimulus package government aid does not suffice against the receding GDP. Proper Implementation and access to every sector of the economy stand between the incentives and their outcome.

 Perks of Fintech

Similarly, amid the pandemic when there is little access available to the outside world. The financial technology (Fintech) comes in effect as a relief. Fintech companies spared consumers the worry of having to operate manually or compromising on access to financial resources. The Elements bringing Fintech to the limelight include Ease, Speed, convenience, and Reach.

Hence, Fintech firms are primarily startups assisting customer base in gaining access to government loans, other loan financing services, and digital payments.

The result- Oriented Innovation

Singapore’s PayNow peer-to-peer money transfer platform has successfully up ticked the transaction for two local banks with reference to the same period last year. In the Philippines, UBX, the fintech arm of a local traditional bank successfully created a market place by the name of Seekcap. The platform has reported having witnessed a 300% increase in loan applications during the first quarter of 2020.

Fintech is lending help by extending services of Money transfer and Payments, Financial Planning, Saving and investments, Borrowing, and insurance. The Philippines’ central bank remarked that the Fintech system has enabled financial inclusion among MSMEs which ensures that the business gets opportune financial access without having to Compromise on SOPs amid pandemic.

Function

Fintech acts as a mediator between government, organizations, and people. This is what earns the trust of consumers towards the initiative to keep the economic system afloat. A key difference between the previously known business disruptor and fintech is that Fintech is inclined towards innovation and mutual corporation. The startup through fresh has the potential to change the course of the pre-existing financial setup.

Though people tend to adhere to the familiar approaches and take time to changes preferences. However, the nature of pandemic has reinforced the need for a well-timed response over ease and comfort.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Oil, Ports, and Proxies: The Battle for Hadhramawt and the Red Sea

Oil, Ports, and Proxies: The Battle for Hadhramawt and the Red Sea

The expulsion of Saudi-backed forces from Hadhramawt by UAE-aligned proxies signals the collapse of the Riyadh-Abu Dhabi alliance. In Yemen and Sudan, Abu Dhabi leverages non-state actors to secure ports, resources, and influence, while Riyadh prioritizes state stability and territorial consolidation. The result: a regional realignment where Gulf unity gives way to fierce intra-Gulf competition.

Read More »
India’s Coercive Foreign Policy in 2025 By Farwa Imtiaz

India’s Coercive Foreign Policy in 2025

India’s foreign policy in 2025 marks a clear break from its earlier soft-power orientation, shifting toward overt coercion and interference. Once seen as a restrained global actor, India now increasingly relies on hard power, diplomatic pressure, and transnational repression to shape external outcomes. Through cases in Canada, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Türkiye, this article shows how India has adopted a more assertive—and often destabilizing—approach to protect its expanding ambitions, using tools ranging from foreign interference to military escalation and economic coercion.

Read More »
The End of Liberal Internationalism

The End of Liberal Internationalism

The 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy marks a decisive break from the post-1945 liberal order, replacing globalism and multilateralism with a neo-Westphalian focus on sovereign nation-states, fortified borders, and exclusionary spheres of influence. It signals America’s retreat from global leadership and the return of great-power rivalry.

Read More »
A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »