Study Tour on Waqf Bill Postponed Amid Opposition Boycott

Study tour on Waqf Bill postponed after Opposition boycott, citing unilateral decisions by panel chairperson. [Image via Indian Express]

The study tour of the Joint Committee of Parliament (JCP) on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill was postponed Monday, days after Opposition members of the panel boycotted it.

The tour started on Saturday from Guwahati and covered Bhubaneswar on Sunday. However, it was halted following a notice by the Lok Sabha Secretariat stating that the remaining part of the study tour on the Waqf Bill to Kolkata, Patna and Lucknow (Tuesday-Thursday) was being postponed.

The notice comes on the heels of Opposition members, who are part of the panel, announcing their decision to boycott the study tour on November 7. Among those who boycotted the tour were leaders from the Congress, Samajwadi Party, DMK, AAP, and AIMIM.

The tour, which was scheduled from November 9-14, was planned so that the members would hear views of diverse stakeholders on the matter.

Also See: India’s Waqf Bill 2024: The State’s Assault on Muslim Heritage

While announcing the boycott, TMC’s Kalyan Banerjee had accused the House panel’s chairperson, Jagdambika Pal, of turning the proceedings into a “mockery”.

Congress member Mohammad Jawed had also earlier said, “We are also answerable to people in our constituencies and respective parties. We understand the committee is an important one, but we need time to prepare for tours and meetings.”

Opposition members of the committee had on November 4 written to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and threatened to “disassociate” from the panel, accusing Pal of “bulldozing the proceedings” and “stonewalling” them. On November 5, the members met Birla and discussed their issues.

Accusing Pal of taking “unilateral decisions on fixing the dates of sittings even for consecutive three days, where persons/ bodies (are) to be called as witness”, they had said that it is not “practically possible” for them to prepare.

This news is sourced from Indian Express and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »