Women in India – Why the Law Alone Is Not Enough

Why legal reforms alone are insufficient for women in India and what more is needed to achieve true freedom and safety?

As India’s independence month ends, the struggle for true freedom remains a distant dream for many women. Ongoing collective outrage grips the nation across Kolkata, New Delhi, Chandigarh, Lucknow, Prayagraj, Patna, and Goa. This outrage follows the violent and brutal rape and murder of a 31-year-old trainee doctor while she rested after a 36-hour shift. A familiar pattern repeats: someone rapes and murders a girl, and people take to the streets in outrage. Authorities then release a statement, law, or criminal amendment. Soon after, someone gang-rapes another woman.

Women in India: The Limitations of the Current Law

This pattern shows that outrage followed by post-mortem legislation is far too little, far too late. India’s amended laws may have contributed to increased reporting of sexual violence, with over 31,000 reported cases in 2022. A new Central Protection Act for Doctors can help standardize protections for healthcare workers. However, without effective and timely implementation from law enforcement to sentencing, these laws remain inadequate. Without a holistic, survivor-centered, and community-led approach to addressing gender-based violence, the problem persists. Additionally, without truly confronting the dehumanization of women, especially marginalized Dalit, Adivasi, and others, the law alone becomes a broken facade.

The Realities of Implementation and Enforcement

In fact, while India’s laws have been submitted to international bodies as evidence of India’s compliance with its international human rights obligations, women have been killed by their assaulters on the way to attend Court hearings for their rape cases. 

Law enforcement has destroyed evidence, silenced victims and their families, and pressured victims to drop their cases or change their testimonies. Forensic evidence collection by medical practitioners is nonstandard at best and invasive at worst. Survivors largely do not receive adequate counseling or legal services. “Fast-track” courts are still slow

When those same international bodies raise concerns about the continued sexual violence against women and girls in India, government leaders immediately admonish them for their “unwarranted” and “unnecessary” comments. They then hold up India’s laws, claiming, “The Constitution guarantees equality to all citizens of India. As a democracy, we have a time-tested record of providing justice to all sections of our society.” However, with 90 reported cases of rape a day, and likely many more unreported, it’s clear that those laws are not enough.

The Unfulfilled Promises

Even when an internal government committee consulted with women’s groups, survivors, civil society, experts, and other stakeholders, it compiled a 644-page report with concrete recommendations. This report, known as the “Verma Committee report,” proposed legal, police, educational, and social reforms to effectively address gender-based violence. However, its recommendations have largely gone unimplemented

Why? Do India’s leaders simply fail to see the depths to which systems dehumanize and overlook women, or do they find it easier just not to look? 

New or amended laws cannot be a substitute for cultural reckoning – they alone do not, as the Verma Committee report writes, “make transformative processes in society which will not only make society more secure, but give equality to women, respect them, give them secure spaces.” 

Perhaps this is the problem. Truly transformative processes must confront tradition; they must confront the way things have always been. A transformed society for women requires a hard look at accepted cultural and social contexts, including embedded caste, religious, and gender discrimination. But even where a woman is 17 times more likely to face sexual violence from her husband than others, marital rape is still legal, and the government has argued that criminalizing marital rape would violate the “sanctity of marriage.” In other words, tradition is not for changing. And so the law must be enough. 

Women in India: The Path to Freedom

It seems that the path to a true and full freedom first requires an unfiltered and honest look in the mirror from India’s leaders. A willingness to engage with difficult truths.

Truths like: it is not freedom to hold back social transformation by being unquestioningly chained to tradition. It is not freedom to uphold the purported “sanctity of marriage” over the right of a woman to live in her own body without fear of violation. Its not freedom when a woman cannot take a nap in her place of work without fear of sexual violence. It is not freedom when a girl is raped while attempting to report a rape. Its not freedom when rape and murder is covered up and instead called suicide. It is not freedom when a woman’s voice is ignored and her story disbelieved. It is not freedom to be told to drop a case because a woman’s rapist has power. 

This is not freedom. And the law is not enough.  

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own. They do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.

Anjali Mehta

Anjali Mehta

Anjali A. Mehta is an international human rights lawyer specializing in post-conflict resolution and gender-based violence. She holds a Juris Doctor from NYU School of Law and has represented sovereign clients before international courts, including the International Court of Justice. Anjali co-founded What is the Power of We, Inc., a global initiative to combat gender-based violence, and has a strong background in pro bono advocacy for asylum seekers and transgender rights. Fluent in multiple languages, she is passionate about transitional justice and fostering dialogue through legal and community-driven approaches.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »