Whenever BJP and Congress Want, They Disrupt House, says Kalyan Banerjee

TMC MP Kalyan Banerjee blames BJP and Congress for disrupting Parliament, amidst ongoing political tensions. [Image via PTI]

Amid disruptions and repeated adjournments in both Houses of Parliament, TMC MP Kalyan Banerjee Wednesday blamed both BJP and Congress for disrupting the proceedings.

Speaking to The Indian Express, TMC’s Serampore MP Kalyan Banerjee said, “Whenever the BJP wants to disrupt the House it does so, whenever Congress wants to disrupt the House it does so. Everyday this is happening. BJP MPs such as Nishikant Dubey and others start shouting and the House is adjourned. Then, Congress MPs ask one or two questions and then start shouting and the House is adjourned. But there are so many political parties in Parliament.”

With the Congress raising the bribery allegations against industrialist Gautam Adani inside and outside Parliament, Banerjee said, “We have come here to do some business. The Adani issue is not the only issue… there are so many issues. Congress is stuck with Adani and BJP is stuck with George Soros. Does it mean that all other issues will go away?”

Banerjee’s comments also come at a time when TMC supremo and West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has expressed interest in leading the INDIA bloc, following which parties such as the RJD and the Shiv Sena UBT have backed her.

Also See: ‘Last Nail in the Coffin?’ Modi Loses Elections to Mamta Banerjee in West Bengal Assembly

This news is sourced from Indian Express and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Herat tragedy claims 30 lives, exposing Afghanistan’s governance failures, unsafe migration, and escalating humanitarian crisis.

Herat Border Tragedy: The Deadly Consequences of Afghanistan’s Governance Failures

The Herat border tragedy, is a stark illustration of the human cost of Afghanistan’s governance failures. With limited economic opportunities, widespread poverty, and insufficient social support, families are forced to undertake life-threatening journeys across freezing mountains. The incident underscores the urgent need for the Afghan government to provide stable livelihoods, establish safe migration routes, and strengthen healthcare and social services, as humanitarian risks continue to escalate across the country.

Read More »
A fact-based rebuttal of claims about Pakistani troop deployment in Gaza, exposing disinformation and reaffirming Pakistan’s UN-mandated peacekeeping doctrine.

Debunking the Gaza Deployment Narrative

False claims of a Pakistani troop deployment to Gaza, amplified by disinformation networks, were firmly rejected by the Foreign Office, reaffirming that Pakistan’s military operates only under UN mandates and constitutional limits.

Read More »
The death of Sharif Osman Hadi marks the collapse of the 1971 Consensus, reshaping Bangladesh’s identity and triggering a strategic crisis for India.

The End of the 1971 Consensus

Sharif Osman Hadi’s death has become the symbolic burial of the 1971 Consensus that long structured India–Bangladesh relations. For a generation with no lived memory of the Liberation War, Hadi embodies a Second Independence, reframing 1971 as the start of Indian dominance rather than true sovereignty. His killing has accelerated Bangladesh’s rupture with India and exposed a deep strategic crisis across South Asia.

Read More »
Afghanistan’s Taliban uses pharmaceutical policy to assert autonomy, decouple from Pakistan, and expand strategic ties with India.

Afghan Taliban’s Biopolitics

The Taliban’s health diplomacy is reshaping Afghanistan’s geopolitical landscape. By phasing out Pakistani pharmaceuticals and inviting Indian partnerships, Kabul securitizes its healthcare infrastructure as a tool of strategic realignment. The shift highlights the intersection of sovereignty, economic statecraft, and regional influence, with Afghan patients bearing the immediate consequences.

Read More »
Islamophobia after violent attacks fuels polarization, legitimizes collective blame, and undermines security while strengthening extremist narratives.

Who Benefits from Islamophobia?

In the wake of global violence, political actors often replace evidence-based analysis with collective blame. Islamophobia, when elevated from fringe rhetoric to state discourse, fractures society and weakens security.

Read More »