When Manmohan Singh Defended “Silent Prime Minister” Charge

Dr. Manmohan Singh, the "silent Prime Minister," dies at 92, remembered for his economic reforms and leadership [Image via Business Today]

New Delhi: Dr Manmohan Singh‘s critics often labelled him as a “silent Prime Minister”, taking a dig at his reticent demeanour during his decade-long tenure at the helm of the UPA government from 2004 to 2014. However, there were moments when the former PM defended himself. 

In 2018, at the launch of ‘Changing India’, a six-volume book set in which Dr Singh chronicled thoughts on his career as an economist who was instrumental in India liberalising its market to him becoming the PM, he stood his ground. 

“People say I was a silent Prime Minister. I think these volumes speak for themselves. I wasn’t the PM who was afraid of talking to the press. I met the press regularly, and on every foreign trip I undertook, I had a press conference on return. So there are a large number of those press conferences whose results are also described in the book,” Dr Singh said. 

Also See: India Faces Diplomatic Challenge as Bangladesh Calls for Extradition of Sheikh Hasina

Dr Singh, India’s 14th PM and one of its most respected economists, died last night at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) in New Delhi. He was 92.

Born on September 26, 1932, in Gah, Punjab (now in Pakistan), Mr Singh’s journey stretched from an academically gifted student in a village with no electricity to one of India’s most influential leaders. After earning a First-Class Honours degree in Economics from the University of Cambridge in 1957, he pursued a D.Phil. in Economics at  Oxford. He began his career as an academic, teaching at Punjab University and later the Delhi School of Economics, before moving into public service.

Dr Singh’s appointment as Finance Minister in 1991 by then Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao marked the turning point for India’s economy. At a time when the country was on the brink of financial collapse, Dr Singh ushered in sweeping liberalisation reforms. He dismantled the licence raj, unshackled private enterprise, and repurchased the gold reserves India had mortgaged just months earlier. 

His work earned him recognition as the architect of modern India’s economic framework.

This news is sourced from NDTV and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »