The 80th session of the UN General Assembly will convene under the theme “Better together: 80 years and more for peace, development, and human rights.” While a commendable aspiration, this theme stands in stark contrast to the persistent and multifaceted security challenges that plague nations like Pakistan. Despite its long-standing commitment to global counter-terrorism efforts, Pakistan remains a principal victim of state-sponsored terrorism. This analysis will explore how cross-border militancy and external agendas undermine regional stability and Pakistan’s internal peace.
The Economic and Human Cost of Terrorism
The human and economic toll of terrorism on Pakistan is staggering and often underestimated by the international community. The country has tragically lost over 80,000 lives, a figure supported by various independent and governmental sources. This figure highlights the immense sacrifice made by the nation in its fight against an insurgency fueled by both internal and external factors.
Economically, the country has incurred devastating losses. While the figure of over $150 billion in economic damages is a long-standing claim, a study cited in the Pakistan Economic Survey 2014-15 estimated that from 2002 to 2015, the direct and indirect costs of terrorism amounted to $106.98 billion. It is highly probable that in the years following 2015, these losses would have exceeded the 150 billion mark. These losses stem from multiple sources: destruction of infrastructure, plummeting foreign direct investment, disrupted trade routes, and a significant diversion of national resources toward security operations. These economic burdens severely impede Pakistan’s development and its ability to achieve the very development goals championed by the UNGA.
The Threat from the West
A major and ongoing threat to Pakistan’s security is cross-border terrorism from Afghanistan. Following the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, there has been a significant resurgence of attacks by the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), as noted in a recent article. Reports from the UN and independent research organizations confirm that the TTP is operating from Afghan soil, using the unstable border region as a base to launch attacks into Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) and Balochistan. A 2024 UN report estimates that the TTP’s strength in Afghanistan is between 6,000 and 6,500 fighters, and according to Pakistan, the Afghan government is directly supporting them.
This failure to curb militant activity is a direct violation of international law and a key factor in the spike in terrorism-related casualties in Pakistan. The situation has led to escalating tensions, with Pakistan conducting counter-terrorism operations and airstrikes inside Afghan territory to target TTP hideouts. This cycle of violence and retaliation, while a grave security concern for Pakistan, also risks further destabilizing the already fragile Afghan state.
Proxy Wars and Geopolitical Agendas
Pakistan has long maintained, backed by proof, that India is orchestrating a proxy war in Balochistan. The arrest of Indian naval officer Kulbhushan Jadhav in 2016 from Balochistan remains the most prominent piece of evidence presented by Pakistan. Pakistan has long declared him of being a Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) agent tasked with orchestrating terror attacks in the province. While India maintains he was a retired officer kidnapped from Iran, Pakistan has presented detailed dossiers to the UN, confirming extensive Indian financial and logistical support for separatist groups in Balochistan. These proxies, including the BLA and Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF), have targeted security forces, civilians, and Chinese nationals working on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a project seen by India as a strategic threat.
The Balochistan issue is further complicated by broader geopolitical interests. The launch of the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI)’s Balochistan Studies Project (BSP) in June 2025 is an example of how a Washington, DC-based think tank frames the Baloch struggle to serve an external agenda. The project, as reported by sources like Morningstar, highlights Balochistan as a perfect outpost to counter Iranian and Chinese ambitions. This perspective, as highlighted by other analysts, suggests that the Balochistan issue is being co-opted to serve broader strategic goals of external powers, moving beyond the traditional India-Pakistan rivalry.
Confronting Peace Rhetoric with Security Realities
As the 80th UNGA session begins, Pakistan’s plea for global peace and development must be heard within the context of its very real security vulnerabilities. The country’s narrative of being a victim of state-sponsored terrorism is not merely a political slogan but a reality supported by extensive data on human casualties and economic devastation. The continued threat from Afghan-based terrorists and the Indian proxy war in Balochistan, now complicated by a seemingly broader, geopolitically motivated external agenda, represent a direct affront to the principles of a peaceful and cooperative world order. For the UN’s theme of “Better together” to hold any meaning, it must acknowledge and address the legitimate security concerns of its member states. Ignoring a nation of 240 million people, grappling with externally-supported violence, would be a disservice to the very ideals of peace and human rights that the General Assembly seeks to uphold.
UNGA 80: Pakistan’s Case Against Terrorism, Proxies, and Global Neglect
The 80th session of the UN General Assembly will convene under the theme “Better together: 80 years and more for peace, development, and human rights.” While a commendable aspiration, this theme stands in stark contrast to the persistent and multifaceted security challenges that plague nations like Pakistan. Despite its long-standing commitment to global counter-terrorism efforts, Pakistan remains a principal victim of state-sponsored terrorism. This analysis will explore how cross-border militancy and external agendas undermine regional stability and Pakistan’s internal peace.
The Economic and Human Cost of Terrorism
The human and economic toll of terrorism on Pakistan is staggering and often underestimated by the international community. The country has tragically lost over 80,000 lives, a figure supported by various independent and governmental sources. This figure highlights the immense sacrifice made by the nation in its fight against an insurgency fueled by both internal and external factors.
Economically, the country has incurred devastating losses. While the figure of over $150 billion in economic damages is a long-standing claim, a study cited in the Pakistan Economic Survey 2014-15 estimated that from 2002 to 2015, the direct and indirect costs of terrorism amounted to $106.98 billion. It is highly probable that in the years following 2015, these losses would have exceeded the 150 billion mark. These losses stem from multiple sources: destruction of infrastructure, plummeting foreign direct investment, disrupted trade routes, and a significant diversion of national resources toward security operations. These economic burdens severely impede Pakistan’s development and its ability to achieve the very development goals championed by the UNGA.
The Threat from the West
A major and ongoing threat to Pakistan’s security is cross-border terrorism from Afghanistan. Following the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, there has been a significant resurgence of attacks by the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), as noted in a recent article. Reports from the UN and independent research organizations confirm that the TTP is operating from Afghan soil, using the unstable border region as a base to launch attacks into Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) and Balochistan. A 2024 UN report estimates that the TTP’s strength in Afghanistan is between 6,000 and 6,500 fighters, and according to Pakistan, the Afghan government is directly supporting them.
This failure to curb militant activity is a direct violation of international law and a key factor in the spike in terrorism-related casualties in Pakistan. The situation has led to escalating tensions, with Pakistan conducting counter-terrorism operations and airstrikes inside Afghan territory to target TTP hideouts. This cycle of violence and retaliation, while a grave security concern for Pakistan, also risks further destabilizing the already fragile Afghan state.
Proxy Wars and Geopolitical Agendas
Pakistan has long maintained, backed by proof, that India is orchestrating a proxy war in Balochistan. The arrest of Indian naval officer Kulbhushan Jadhav in 2016 from Balochistan remains the most prominent piece of evidence presented by Pakistan. Pakistan has long declared him of being a Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) agent tasked with orchestrating terror attacks in the province. While India maintains he was a retired officer kidnapped from Iran, Pakistan has presented detailed dossiers to the UN, confirming extensive Indian financial and logistical support for separatist groups in Balochistan. These proxies, including the BLA and Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF), have targeted security forces, civilians, and Chinese nationals working on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a project seen by India as a strategic threat.
The Balochistan issue is further complicated by broader geopolitical interests. The launch of the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI)’s Balochistan Studies Project (BSP) in June 2025 is an example of how a Washington, DC-based think tank frames the Baloch struggle to serve an external agenda. The project, as reported by sources like Morningstar, highlights Balochistan as a perfect outpost to counter Iranian and Chinese ambitions. This perspective, as highlighted by other analysts, suggests that the Balochistan issue is being co-opted to serve broader strategic goals of external powers, moving beyond the traditional India-Pakistan rivalry.
Confronting Peace Rhetoric with Security Realities
As the 80th UNGA session begins, Pakistan’s plea for global peace and development must be heard within the context of its very real security vulnerabilities. The country’s narrative of being a victim of state-sponsored terrorism is not merely a political slogan but a reality supported by extensive data on human casualties and economic devastation. The continued threat from Afghan-based terrorists and the Indian proxy war in Balochistan, now complicated by a seemingly broader, geopolitically motivated external agenda, represent a direct affront to the principles of a peaceful and cooperative world order. For the UN’s theme of “Better together” to hold any meaning, it must acknowledge and address the legitimate security concerns of its member states. Ignoring a nation of 240 million people, grappling with externally-supported violence, would be a disservice to the very ideals of peace and human rights that the General Assembly seeks to uphold.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
Recent
Broken Promises: The Taliban’s Betrayal of Global Commitments
Nearly three years after seizing power, the Taliban’s systematic violation of their international commitments under the 2020 Doha Accord has transformed Afghanistan into a sanctuary for terrorism, entrenched an autocratic regime, and institutionalized gender apartheid. Beyond moral failure, this deceit poses a grave threat to regional stability, international counterterrorism efforts, and the credibility of global diplomacy. Holding the regime accountable is now a strategic necessity, not a choice.
Do You Remember 6/11/ 1947?: A Forgotten Jammu Genocide and the Continuing Erasure of Kashmiriyat
On November 6, 1947, one of South Asia’s earliest genocides unfolded in Jammu, where hundreds of thousands of Muslims were massacred or forced to flee. Yet, unlike other global tragedies, this atrocity remains buried in silence. The Jammu Genocide not only reshaped the region’s demography but laid the foundation for India’s ongoing campaign of identity erasure in Kashmir. From demographic engineering to cultural censorship, the spirit of Kashmiriyat continues to face systematic annihilation.
India’s Climate Policy after COP28: Net Zero 2070 — A Fair Promise or a Risky Postponement?
India’s Net Zero 2070 target reflects a delicate balance between development equity and climate urgency. While progress in renewables, green finance, and adaptation is visible, the absence of clear interim milestones risks turning ambition into delay. The real challenge lies in translating a distant horizon into measurable, near-term climate action before 2030.
The Tehreek-e-Hijrat of 1920 and Its Parallels with Contemporary Refugee Politics
The Tehreek-e-Hijrat of 1920 saw thousands of Indian Muslims migrate to Afghanistan, only to be turned away when Kabul could no longer cope. A century later, Afghan officials criticise Pakistan’s refugee policies while ignoring their own historical refusal to host Muslim migrants. The parallel reveals not just irony, but the enduring challenge of compassion, capacity, and collective responsibility.
Playing the Victim: How the Taliban Endorse and Amplify Online Propaganda Against Pakistan
Following the October 2025 border clashes, the Taliban have shifted their battlefield online, using propaganda, selective history, and digital disinformation to paint Pakistan as the aggressor. Through controlled media releases, colonial-era references, and victimhood narratives, Kabul seeks to manipulate regional perception and deflect blame for its own failures.