The 80th session of the UN General Assembly will convene under the theme “Better together: 80 years and more for peace, development, and human rights.” While a commendable aspiration, this theme stands in stark contrast to the persistent and multifaceted security challenges that plague nations like Pakistan. Despite its long-standing commitment to global counter-terrorism efforts, Pakistan remains a principal victim of state-sponsored terrorism. This analysis will explore how cross-border militancy and external agendas undermine regional stability and Pakistan’s internal peace.
The Economic and Human Cost of Terrorism
The human and economic toll of terrorism on Pakistan is staggering and often underestimated by the international community. The country has tragically lost over 80,000 lives, a figure supported by various independent and governmental sources. This figure highlights the immense sacrifice made by the nation in its fight against an insurgency fueled by both internal and external factors.
Economically, the country has incurred devastating losses. While the figure of over $150 billion in economic damages is a long-standing claim, a study cited in the Pakistan Economic Survey 2014-15 estimated that from 2002 to 2015, the direct and indirect costs of terrorism amounted to $106.98 billion. It is highly probable that in the years following 2015, these losses would have exceeded the 150 billion mark. These losses stem from multiple sources: destruction of infrastructure, plummeting foreign direct investment, disrupted trade routes, and a significant diversion of national resources toward security operations. These economic burdens severely impede Pakistan’s development and its ability to achieve the very development goals championed by the UNGA.
The Threat from the West
A major and ongoing threat to Pakistan’s security is cross-border terrorism from Afghanistan. Following the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, there has been a significant resurgence of attacks by the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), as noted in a recent article. Reports from the UN and independent research organizations confirm that the TTP is operating from Afghan soil, using the unstable border region as a base to launch attacks into Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) and Balochistan. A 2024 UN report estimates that the TTP’s strength in Afghanistan is between 6,000 and 6,500 fighters, and according to Pakistan, the Afghan government is directly supporting them.
This failure to curb militant activity is a direct violation of international law and a key factor in the spike in terrorism-related casualties in Pakistan. The situation has led to escalating tensions, with Pakistan conducting counter-terrorism operations and airstrikes inside Afghan territory to target TTP hideouts. This cycle of violence and retaliation, while a grave security concern for Pakistan, also risks further destabilizing the already fragile Afghan state.
Proxy Wars and Geopolitical Agendas
Pakistan has long maintained, backed by proof, that India is orchestrating a proxy war in Balochistan. The arrest of Indian naval officer Kulbhushan Jadhav in 2016 from Balochistan remains the most prominent piece of evidence presented by Pakistan. Pakistan has long declared him of being a Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) agent tasked with orchestrating terror attacks in the province. While India maintains he was a retired officer kidnapped from Iran, Pakistan has presented detailed dossiers to the UN, confirming extensive Indian financial and logistical support for separatist groups in Balochistan. These proxies, including the BLA and Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF), have targeted security forces, civilians, and Chinese nationals working on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a project seen by India as a strategic threat.
The Balochistan issue is further complicated by broader geopolitical interests. The launch of the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI)’s Balochistan Studies Project (BSP) in June 2025 is an example of how a Washington, DC-based think tank frames the Baloch struggle to serve an external agenda. The project, as reported by sources like Morningstar, highlights Balochistan as a perfect outpost to counter Iranian and Chinese ambitions. This perspective, as highlighted by other analysts, suggests that the Balochistan issue is being co-opted to serve broader strategic goals of external powers, moving beyond the traditional India-Pakistan rivalry.
Confronting Peace Rhetoric with Security Realities
As the 80th UNGA session begins, Pakistan’s plea for global peace and development must be heard within the context of its very real security vulnerabilities. The country’s narrative of being a victim of state-sponsored terrorism is not merely a political slogan but a reality supported by extensive data on human casualties and economic devastation. The continued threat from Afghan-based terrorists and the Indian proxy war in Balochistan, now complicated by a seemingly broader, geopolitically motivated external agenda, represent a direct affront to the principles of a peaceful and cooperative world order. For the UN’s theme of “Better together” to hold any meaning, it must acknowledge and address the legitimate security concerns of its member states. Ignoring a nation of 240 million people, grappling with externally-supported violence, would be a disservice to the very ideals of peace and human rights that the General Assembly seeks to uphold.
UNGA 80: Pakistan’s Case Against Terrorism, Proxies, and Global Neglect
The 80th session of the UN General Assembly will convene under the theme “Better together: 80 years and more for peace, development, and human rights.” While a commendable aspiration, this theme stands in stark contrast to the persistent and multifaceted security challenges that plague nations like Pakistan. Despite its long-standing commitment to global counter-terrorism efforts, Pakistan remains a principal victim of state-sponsored terrorism. This analysis will explore how cross-border militancy and external agendas undermine regional stability and Pakistan’s internal peace.
The Economic and Human Cost of Terrorism
The human and economic toll of terrorism on Pakistan is staggering and often underestimated by the international community. The country has tragically lost over 80,000 lives, a figure supported by various independent and governmental sources. This figure highlights the immense sacrifice made by the nation in its fight against an insurgency fueled by both internal and external factors.
Economically, the country has incurred devastating losses. While the figure of over $150 billion in economic damages is a long-standing claim, a study cited in the Pakistan Economic Survey 2014-15 estimated that from 2002 to 2015, the direct and indirect costs of terrorism amounted to $106.98 billion. It is highly probable that in the years following 2015, these losses would have exceeded the 150 billion mark. These losses stem from multiple sources: destruction of infrastructure, plummeting foreign direct investment, disrupted trade routes, and a significant diversion of national resources toward security operations. These economic burdens severely impede Pakistan’s development and its ability to achieve the very development goals championed by the UNGA.
The Threat from the West
A major and ongoing threat to Pakistan’s security is cross-border terrorism from Afghanistan. Following the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, there has been a significant resurgence of attacks by the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), as noted in a recent article. Reports from the UN and independent research organizations confirm that the TTP is operating from Afghan soil, using the unstable border region as a base to launch attacks into Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) and Balochistan. A 2024 UN report estimates that the TTP’s strength in Afghanistan is between 6,000 and 6,500 fighters, and according to Pakistan, the Afghan government is directly supporting them.
This failure to curb militant activity is a direct violation of international law and a key factor in the spike in terrorism-related casualties in Pakistan. The situation has led to escalating tensions, with Pakistan conducting counter-terrorism operations and airstrikes inside Afghan territory to target TTP hideouts. This cycle of violence and retaliation, while a grave security concern for Pakistan, also risks further destabilizing the already fragile Afghan state.
Proxy Wars and Geopolitical Agendas
Pakistan has long maintained, backed by proof, that India is orchestrating a proxy war in Balochistan. The arrest of Indian naval officer Kulbhushan Jadhav in 2016 from Balochistan remains the most prominent piece of evidence presented by Pakistan. Pakistan has long declared him of being a Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) agent tasked with orchestrating terror attacks in the province. While India maintains he was a retired officer kidnapped from Iran, Pakistan has presented detailed dossiers to the UN, confirming extensive Indian financial and logistical support for separatist groups in Balochistan. These proxies, including the BLA and Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF), have targeted security forces, civilians, and Chinese nationals working on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a project seen by India as a strategic threat.
The Balochistan issue is further complicated by broader geopolitical interests. The launch of the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI)’s Balochistan Studies Project (BSP) in June 2025 is an example of how a Washington, DC-based think tank frames the Baloch struggle to serve an external agenda. The project, as reported by sources like Morningstar, highlights Balochistan as a perfect outpost to counter Iranian and Chinese ambitions. This perspective, as highlighted by other analysts, suggests that the Balochistan issue is being co-opted to serve broader strategic goals of external powers, moving beyond the traditional India-Pakistan rivalry.
Confronting Peace Rhetoric with Security Realities
As the 80th UNGA session begins, Pakistan’s plea for global peace and development must be heard within the context of its very real security vulnerabilities. The country’s narrative of being a victim of state-sponsored terrorism is not merely a political slogan but a reality supported by extensive data on human casualties and economic devastation. The continued threat from Afghan-based terrorists and the Indian proxy war in Balochistan, now complicated by a seemingly broader, geopolitically motivated external agenda, represent a direct affront to the principles of a peaceful and cooperative world order. For the UN’s theme of “Better together” to hold any meaning, it must acknowledge and address the legitimate security concerns of its member states. Ignoring a nation of 240 million people, grappling with externally-supported violence, would be a disservice to the very ideals of peace and human rights that the General Assembly seeks to uphold.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
Recent
Narrative Management and the ISKP–TTP Ecosystem
The assassination of Maulana Sultan reveals how ISKP and TTP deploy narrative coordination, delayed claims, and interchangeable branding to obscure accountability and sustain regional instability from Afghan soil.
Pakistan’s Defense Industrial Breakout
As the liberal international order fragments, Pakistan has executed a decisive shift from defense dependency to indigenous production. Through exports, combat validation, and joint industrialization, Islamabad is redefining sovereignty as an industrial and diplomatic asset.
Rethinking Afghan Repatriation from Pakistan
Amnesty International’s call to halt Afghan repatriation overlooks the limits of long-term hospitality. For Pakistan, the issue is less about abandoning rights than reasserting sovereign immigration control amid shifting realities in Afghanistan.
Iran’s Current Crisis: Structural Pressures and Political Trajectories
Iran’s 2025–26 unrest reflects simultaneous pressure on economic stability, political legitimacy, and state coercive capacity, marking a critical juncture for the Islamic Republic.
The New Architecture of US–Pakistan Relations
Andy Halus’s interview signals a strategic shift in US–Pakistan relations from security-centric ties to a multidimensional partnership centered on minerals, education, and soft power. Projects like Reko Diq now stand as the key test of this new architecture.