Torkham Border Closure Enters 18th Day Amid Pak-Afghan Dispute

Torkham border closure enters 18th day, disrupting trade & livelihoods. Urgent Pak-Afghan dialogue needed to resolve tensions.

The closure of the Torkham border between Pakistan and Afghanistan has now entered its 18th consecutive day, disrupting trade and leaving thousands of people in financial distress. The key crossing point, which serves as a vital trade corridor between the two countries, remains shut due to an escalating dispute over construction in a contested area.

According to Pak-Afghan affairs analyst Naseeb Shah Shinwari, certain locations along the Torkham border remain disputed. He cites a senior official from a research organization in Islamabad who revealed that an informal agreement exists between the two governments, stipulating that any construction in these areas should be carried out through mutual consultation and consent. However, Afghanistan’s unilateral decision to build a controversial checkpoint in the disputed area has triggered tensions, leading to the border’s prolonged closure.

“The Torkham crossing is a crucial economic artery for both nations, with approximately $3 million in bilateral trade flowing through it daily,” Shinwari stated, quoting a customs official. “The continued shutdown is inflicting millions of dollars in financial losses on Pakistan’s already struggling economy.”

Also See: Torkham Tensions: Afghan Forces Withdraw Excavator After Jirga Intervention

Beyond the economic toll, the closure has severely impacted local communities reliant on cross-border movement for their livelihoods. Shahin, a laborer at Torkham, described the crisis, emphasizing that thousands—including daily wage workers, cart pullers, hotel employees, and transport operators—have been left jobless, pushing them into a dire financial situation.

Shinwari underscores that both countries must adhere to their existing understanding regarding disputed territories and refrain from unilateral actions that fuel instability. “Pakistan and Afghanistan must exercise restraint and engage in dialogue,” he urged. “If both nations resort to rigid postures, it will only deepen the crisis, harming their economies and regional stability.”

As the border remains closed, the urgency for diplomatic engagement grows. Analysts warn that failure to resolve the dispute could further strain already fragile Pak-Afghan relations, making an amicable settlement imperative.

Disclaimer: This article is for news reporting purposes only and reflects the analysis of Pak-Afghan affairs analyst Naseeb Shah Shinwari.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »