Torkham Border Closure Enters 18th Day Amid Pak-Afghan Dispute

Torkham border closure enters 18th day, disrupting trade & livelihoods. Urgent Pak-Afghan dialogue needed to resolve tensions.

The closure of the Torkham border between Pakistan and Afghanistan has now entered its 18th consecutive day, disrupting trade and leaving thousands of people in financial distress. The key crossing point, which serves as a vital trade corridor between the two countries, remains shut due to an escalating dispute over construction in a contested area.

According to Pak-Afghan affairs analyst Naseeb Shah Shinwari, certain locations along the Torkham border remain disputed. He cites a senior official from a research organization in Islamabad who revealed that an informal agreement exists between the two governments, stipulating that any construction in these areas should be carried out through mutual consultation and consent. However, Afghanistan’s unilateral decision to build a controversial checkpoint in the disputed area has triggered tensions, leading to the border’s prolonged closure.

“The Torkham crossing is a crucial economic artery for both nations, with approximately $3 million in bilateral trade flowing through it daily,” Shinwari stated, quoting a customs official. “The continued shutdown is inflicting millions of dollars in financial losses on Pakistan’s already struggling economy.”

Also See: Torkham Tensions: Afghan Forces Withdraw Excavator After Jirga Intervention

Beyond the economic toll, the closure has severely impacted local communities reliant on cross-border movement for their livelihoods. Shahin, a laborer at Torkham, described the crisis, emphasizing that thousands—including daily wage workers, cart pullers, hotel employees, and transport operators—have been left jobless, pushing them into a dire financial situation.

Shinwari underscores that both countries must adhere to their existing understanding regarding disputed territories and refrain from unilateral actions that fuel instability. “Pakistan and Afghanistan must exercise restraint and engage in dialogue,” he urged. “If both nations resort to rigid postures, it will only deepen the crisis, harming their economies and regional stability.”

As the border remains closed, the urgency for diplomatic engagement grows. Analysts warn that failure to resolve the dispute could further strain already fragile Pak-Afghan relations, making an amicable settlement imperative.

Disclaimer: This article is for news reporting purposes only and reflects the analysis of Pak-Afghan affairs analyst Naseeb Shah Shinwari.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »