Time to Recalibrate State’s Institutional Engineering?

In a nation grappling with economic instability, the urgency to recalibrate State’s Institutional Engineering has never been more apparent.

Is it time to recalibrate State’s Institutional Engineering in Pakistan’s governance blueprint? In a country grappling with economic turbulence, the concept of State’s Institutional Engineering has never been more relevant. Imagine a landscape where the government is not just reacting to crises but strategically reshaping its institutions to drive growth. 

State’s Institutional Engineering – A Case of Pakistan

The government of Pakistan is pursuing a comprehensive restructuring plan to address the nation’s economic crisis. It also aims to maintain a critical standing for the International Monetary Fund (IMF) bailout plan. This push to recalibrate State’s Institutional Engineering involves radical downsizing of the public sector and regulatory bodies. The plan includes the elimination or merging of several ministries. Although the government is implementing these measures for fiscal austerity, experts need to closely examine their impact on governance and service delivery.

The Push for Change

The proposal to abolish five ministries, including IT, Industry, Health, and Kashmir Affairs, represents a viable shift from the current approach. At the same time, analysts must critically examine the mission and goals of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs (MoMA). This evaluation should consider its performance to date. Although the government established MoMA with ambitious objectives, the institution has rarely produced any tangible outcomes so far. To recalibrate State’s Institutional Engineering, the government could consider a strategic merger with the Ministry of Defence. This approach could help balance operations and reduce the economic burden.

An Overburdened Structure

Pakistan’s institutional infrastructure encapsulates 33 federal ministries which are embracing some 40 divisions. Even without considering the perks and privileges associated with bureaucracy, this number remains a heavy burden on a nation struggling under high energy bills and inflation. Ultimately, it’s crucial to weigh the pros and cons carefully. Policymakers need to determine whether merging these ministries will truly benefit national security and the economy. In 2017, the Ministry of Ports and Shipping was merged into the Ministry of Maritime Affairs (MoMA) to unlock the nation’s maritime potential. Its mandate included regulating maritime trade, developing coastal infrastructure, and fostering the blue economy. This consolidation also absorbed many of the functions of its parent ministry.

The Role of Maritime Affairs

Additionally, the ministry was tasked with cultivating the shipping and shipbuilding industries. It also had to ensure the sustainable exploitation of marine resources. Moreover, the Ministry of Maritime Affairs, the primary government institute overseeing Pakistan’s maritime matters, declared 2020 as the ‘Year of Blue Economy’. Unfortunately, there is hardly anything worthwhile in the public eye in almost four years.

MoMA has failed to deliver on its core responsibilities compared to its lofty mandate. It has not capitalized on Pakistan’s coastline potential for trade, fisheries, and energy since its inception. A lack of strategic foresight and ineffective policy implementation have hindered the development of the maritime sector. This has resulted in depleted opportunities and sub-optimal resource allocation.

Also See: Pakistan Navy Adds Offshore Patrol Vessel PNS Hunain and PNS Babur on Defence Day

The Need for Reassessment

Clearly, multiple factors influenced the institution’s operational shortcomings, which included bureaucratic inefficiencies, a lack of coordination with other relevant agencies, and a disregard for economic imperatives, under-performing its relative potential. Consequently, MoMA’s existence has become a liability rather than an asset, compelling a critical re-evaluation of its role and functions.

Factors Influencing Operational Shortcomings

Comparatively, other South Asian maritime nations like India and China reveal significant differences in institutional structure and resource allocation process to optimally regulate maritime development. While MoMA is juggling up into a broad range of maritime responsibilities, the specialized ministries in India and China showcase a more focused approach which ultimately enhances their efficiency. This mandate of MoMA has hindered its capacity to effectively address critical maritime challenges. 

Furthermore, the stark difference in resource allocation is evident, with China and India making substantial investments in its maritime sector, far surpassing Pakistan’s efforts. India has devised the knowledge and insights of academia and the policy community to give a strategic direction to India’s pursuits in the maritime sector in the shape of India’s blue economy vision 2025. New Delhi has allocated the budget of Rs 2,352 crore for its blue economy revolution in 2024. Additionally, with the vision to modernize Indian sea ports and infrastructure-the country has launched a mega project called Sagar Mala which includes improving connectivity with coastal regions. Additionally, the government of India released a draft policy exclusively for India’s blue economy which invites public insights and consultation for effective excellence in the field. The centralized structure of MoMA, unlike India’s decentralized model, may also contribute to inefficiencies and delays in decision-making.

An Opportunity for Austerity Measures

In this regard, the government’s impending austerity measures could prove to be a critical opportunity to address and mitigate the inefficiencies plaguing the Ministry of Maritime Affairs. If implemented effectively, this institutional downsizing can yield significant economic benefits for Pakistan. By reducing bureaucracy and eliminating overlapping functions, the government can potentially reduce expenditures and redirect resources to priority areas such as infrastructure development and social welfare programs. Moreover, downsizing can bring fiscal discipline and enhance the government’s credibility in the eyes of international financial institutions.

Strategic Consolidation

In essence, to enhance efficiency and effectiveness, the Ministry of Maritime Affairs (MoMA) should be realigned as a division under the Ministry of Defense. This consolidation would optimize resource allocation, expedite decision-making processes, and ensure a more coordinated approach to maritime challenges. Such a strategic shift is crucial to unlocking the full potential of Pakistan’s blue economy and driving national development.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own. They do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.

Syeda Fizzah Shuja

Syeda Fizzah Shuja

Syeda Fizzah Shuja is a Research Associate at Pakistan Navy War College (PNWC) in Lahore. With expertise in maritime strategy and security, she contributes in-depth analysis and research on naval and geopolitical dynamics. Her work focuses on the strategic significance of key maritime regions, including the Indian Ocean, and she plays a vital role in shaping defense and security policies.

Recent

The Nobel Peace Prize or War Prize? A History of Controversial Laureates.

The Nobel Peace Prize or War Prize? A History of Controversial Laureates

Far from being an impartial recognition of pacifism, the Nobel Peace Prize’s legacy is marred by controversial laureates whose actions have been linked to immense violence. The prize is not a universal arbiter of peace but a political instrument reflecting a Western-centric worldview, rewarding figures who align with its geopolitical interests, regardless of the blood on their hands.

Read More »
An analysis of a false Financial Times report on a Pakistan-US port deal, its journalistic flaws, and its weaponization for political gain.

Geopolitics, Journalism, and the Anatomy of a False Narrative

A recent Financial Times story claimed Pakistan was pitching a new Arabian Sea port to the US Built on anonymous sources and logical flaws, the report was quietly corrected. This article dissects how the flimsy reporting was weaponized by domestic and regional actors to push a false narrative, revealing more about their political agendas than Pakistan’s foreign policy.

Read More »
An analysis of the Trump Gaza peace plan. Despite Hamas's surprise support, deep divides over security and sovereignty threaten any chance of lasting peace.

The Promises and Perils of the New Gaza Plan

A new Gaza peace plan by Donald Trump has international backing and a surprising partial acceptance from Hamas. However, its journey toward lasting peace is threatened by critical deal-breakers and the unresolved core question of Palestinian political sovereignty.

Read More »
Pakistan’s associate membership at CERN marks a milestone in science and technology collaboration. By partnering with the world’s leading particle physics center, Pakistan is strengthening innovation, research, and high-tech industry integration, paving the way for economic and scientific advancement.

Pakistan’s Path to Innovation through CERN Partnership

Pakistan’s growing partnership with CERN highlights its rising role in global science and technology. As the first South Asian state to become an associate member, Pakistan is advancing research, training young scientists, and opening doors for high-tech industry and innovation through its collaboration with the world’s leading particle physics center.

Read More »