The Spillover of Chaos: Afghanistan’s Instability and Its Regional Fallout

ISKP's resurgence in Afghanistan threatens regional security, with Pakistan facing deadly attacks and growing militant activity.

The specter of violence in Afghanistan has once again spilled beyond its borders, with devastating consequences for the region. On February 28, 2025, a suicide bomber targeted one of Pakistan’s most prominent religious figures, Moulana Hamid ul Haq, son of the late Moulana Sami ul Haq, at his seminary, leading to his tragic demise.

Fingers have been pointed toward the Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP), a group that has long employed such deadly tactics. For analysts, this is not just another high-profile assassination but a symptom of a deeper crisis—the resurgence of terrorism and lawlessness taking root in Afghanistan.

ISKP’s Resurgence: A Persistent Threat

Despite the Afghan interim government’s mid-2024 claims of eliminating ISKP, the reality tells a different story. The group remains active and potent, with its operational footprint expanding. In the past two years alone, ISKP has orchestrated a series of high-casualty attacks inside Afghanistan, including:

  • The Kunduz bombing last month, which claimed the lives of approximately 40 Taliban officials.
  • The assassination of prominent figures such as Sheikh Rahimullah Haqqani (2022), Haji Khalil Haqqani (2024), Arsala Kharoti (2025), and now, Moulana Hamid ul Haq (2025).

These attacks underscore ISKP’s ability to recalibrate, strike at will, and maintain stronghold pockets inside Afghanistan, despite the Taliban’s assurances of security.

Also See: Afghanistan: Terror Hub or Global Chessboard

Pakistan’s Counterterrorism Efforts and the Afghan Dilemma

Pakistan, too, has faced the brunt of this evolving threat. Just weeks ago, security forces dismantled a high-profile ISIS network operating from Balochistan, signaling the growing reach of transnational militant groups. Meanwhile, the Taliban’s inability to completely neutralize ISKP has been attributed to internal fissures within its leadership, particularly between the Kandahar faction and the Haqqani network.

Mullah Haibatullah Akhundzada’s insistence on hardline governance—both on the Afghan people and within the Taliban’s ranks—has fueled internal discord. A striking pattern has emerged: ISKP’s most high-profile targets have consistently belonged to the Haqqani network.

Analysts suggest that economic decline, monopolization of key sectors by the Kandahar faction, and preferential treatment toward individuals from the Noorzai tribe over other Taliban factions have reignited old divisions. The historic rivalry between Loya Paktia and Loya Kandahar is once again shaping political and security dynamics, exposing deeper fractures within the Taliban regime.

Regional Impact: A Growing Security Challenge

The instability in Afghanistan has sent shockwaves through the region, with Pakistan bearing the brunt. A United Nations Security Council (UNSC) report indicates that Pakistan has endured 600 attacks over the past four years from militant outfits like the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), and Majeed Brigade (MB)—a troubling indicator of Afghanistan’s continued role as a militant hub.

Additionally, Al-Qaeda’s resurgence and ISKP’s growing influence pose a direct threat to regional stability. Analysts warn that polarizing policies in Afghanistan are pushing disillusioned northern populations toward ISKP, challenging the Taliban’s claims of complete territorial control.

Taliban 2.0: A Government Losing Its Grip?

While some remain hopeful that the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (IEA) will eventually assert full control, emerging reports paint a starkly different picture. Ministerial resignations, targeted killings of key figures, growing youth discontent, and the marginalization of women have raised serious concerns about the Taliban’s governance.

For Afghan policymakers and regional stakeholders, the time for urgent intervention is now. If left unaddressed, the ongoing crisis could further destabilize South Asia, deepening the cycle of extremism and violence that has plagued the region for decades.

SAT Commentaries’ are social media threads by various authors, reproduced here for website use. Views are their own.

SAT Commentary

SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.

Recent

Pakistan’s shift from arms importer to defense exporter reveals how indigenous military industry has become central to sovereignty in a fragmented global order.

Pakistan’s Defense Industrial Breakout

As the liberal international order fragments, Pakistan has executed a decisive shift from defense dependency to indigenous production. Through exports, combat validation, and joint industrialization, Islamabad is redefining sovereignty as an industrial and diplomatic asset.

Read More »
A critical reassessment of Afghan repatriation from Pakistan, weighing human rights advocacy against state sovereignty, security, and legal realities.

Rethinking Afghan Repatriation from Pakistan

Amnesty International’s call to halt Afghan repatriation overlooks the limits of long-term hospitality. For Pakistan, the issue is less about abandoning rights than reasserting sovereign immigration control amid shifting realities in Afghanistan.

Read More »
Andy Halus’s interview signals a shift in US–Pakistan relations toward minerals, education, and soft power, marking a post-security partnership in 2026.

The New Architecture of US–Pakistan Relations

Andy Halus’s interview signals a strategic shift in US–Pakistan relations from security-centric ties to a multidimensional partnership centered on minerals, education, and soft power. Projects like Reko Diq now stand as the key test of this new architecture.

Read More »