The Indian Muslim: Shadows of Pahalgam and Waqf Bill

Waqf

Executive Summary:

The period following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in India (May 2025) exposed a multifaceted crisis for the Muslim community, marked by a brief but intense military confrontation with Pakistan, the controversial enactment of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, and a disturbing surge in anti-Muslim violence and hate speech. This confluence of events highlights a deepening communal polarization and a shifting, increasingly precarious landscape for Muslim identity and rights within the Indian polity. While India’s “Operation Sindoor” and Pakistan’s “Operation Bunyanum Marsoos” led to a U.S.-brokered ceasefire, the domestic fallout from the Pahalgam attack saw heightened scrutiny and communal targeting of Indian and Kashmiri Muslims, despite investigations yielding no major leads. Simultaneously, the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, viewed by many as a state-led appropriation of Muslim religious endowments, triggered widespread protests and a Supreme Court challenge. This legislation, along with the surge in hate speech and real-world violence , underscores a worrying trend of majoritarian assertion and the systematic marginalization of Muslims in India, as reflected in a fragmented media landscape and a constant demand for loyalty tests from the Muslim community.

Main Points:

• Pahalgam attack triggered “Operation Sindoor” (India) and “Operation Bunyanum Marsoos” (Pakistan), followed by a U.S.-brokered ceasefire on May 10.

• Pahalgam attack investigations yielded no major leads, despite detaining over 150 Muslims.

• Indian and Kashmiri Muslims faced heightened scrutiny and communal targeting post- Pahalgam attack.

• The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, seen as state overreach, abolished “waqf by user” and mandated non-Muslim inclusion on Waqf Boards.

• Supreme Court reserved judgment on petitions challenging the Waqf Act’s infringement on religious freedoms.

• Widespread protests against the Waqf Act erupted across India, led by Muslim religious and civil society organizations.

• A “sharp spike” in anti-Muslim hate speech was observed, with India Hate Lab documenting 64 incidents and a 74% increase in anti-minority hate speech in 2024.

• Incendiary “Hindutva Pop” music, calling for violence and demonizing Muslims, gained significant traction online.

• Real-world anti-Muslim violence, including targeted killings, assaults, discrimination, and “bulldozer justice” demolitions, surged.

• Indian media was starkly divided, with mainstream outlets adopting a nationalistic stance while Urdu dailies promoted unity and countered communal narratives.

SAT Web Administrator

Recent

Is Social Media Neutral?

Is Social Media Neutral?

Social media platforms are not neutral arenas of free expression. Powered by opaque algorithms and AI-driven amplification, they increasingly shape political narratives and public perception, prompting non-Western states to frame platform regulation not as censorship, but as a question of digital and cognitive sovereignty.

Read More »
The Mainstreaming of Islamophobia

The Mainstreaming of Islamophobia

The attack on a Victorian Imam and his wife in Melbourne is not an isolated crime but the logical outcome of a political climate that has normalized Islamophobia. As anti-Muslim rhetoric moves from the fringes into mainstream Western discourse, religious identity is recast as a security threat, creating the conditions for violence and unequal protection under the law.

Read More »
Pakistan’s shift from arms importer to defense exporter reveals how indigenous military industry has become central to sovereignty in a fragmented global order.

Pakistan’s Defense Industrial Breakout

As the liberal international order fragments, Pakistan has executed a decisive shift from defense dependency to indigenous production. Through exports, combat validation, and joint industrialization, Islamabad is redefining sovereignty as an industrial and diplomatic asset.

Read More »